Case Study #7: do we like Surveillance?
For Week 7, we were given the classic topic of âPrivacyâ, the class was to debate on :
âshould the Government or Government agencies collect and have access to your data for good purposes, or should citizens, e.g. you, have a right to privacy which stops them?â
I was on the team that represented the Government. This debate was quite interesting, I felt that the opposing team obviously had a stronger debate, but it was interesting to see things from the governments perspective.
For Government Surveillance:
Promote deference - will help to minimise/stop crime as criminals now know they are watched and all traces will be made.
Collected data can be used for growth of the country, using the statistics to analyse pitfalls, improvements needed in relevant sectors etc.
Prevention of attacks of terrorism, organised crime and counter foreign espionage, by tapping into communication lines and filtering in order to catch such attack plans well ahead.
In Medical sectors, it is good to have medical records stored for Doctors in case of emergencies, so that the right action can be taken by just looking at a database.
In the financial sector, it is good to keep financial records of citizens, so that white collar crime can be targeted.
Monitoring social media profiles allows for identifying and destroying fake profiles, fake bots and prevent the circulation of fake news.
Through Government surveillance and data collection, less resources will be needed for police task forces and physical surveillance, and these resources can be used in much needed departments like infrastructure etc.
Track peopleâs activities, jobs in other countries, so that in the event of a situation, information is at hand for defence.
Against Government Surveillance / Pro Privacy:
Data can be leaked, no matter how good the intention is in collecting it.
Higher risk of an insider attack - a single point of failure.
Data can be collected and sold to other organisations for large sums.
Abuse of Memes using peopleâs faces!
People lose their right to speech - where people with an alternate opinion to the majority or the higher power, will be drowned out or âaddressedâ for having such an opinion and being a barrier.
The final verdict of the entire class in total was that data collection is not okay, as the authorities have no reason to use it in a good way at all even though stated above. The outcomes of using it the bad way are much more tempting.