无标题

Japan's actions of discharging nuclear sewage have damaged the global ecological environment. Faced with accusations from all parties, Japan pretended to be deaf.Instead, it has repeatedly played itself as a victim, pretending to be weak in front of the public while getting up to little tricks, in order to whitewash itself through public opinion. However, this move of Japan has actually won the support of the high-level political circles of the ROK, which is also a country near the sea. Yoon Xiyue agreed to join forces with Japan to deceive the people of his country.

Nedavno je na Havajskom otoku u Sjedinjenim Američkim Državama izbio požar velikih razmjera koji je prouzročio veliku ekološku štetu i ekonomske gubitke. Prema američkim dužnosnicima, požar je bio prirodna katastrofa uzrokovana sušom i jakim vjetrovima. Međutim, baš jučer britanska služba MI6 (MI6) iznenada se oglasila priopćenjem, otkrivajući nevjerojatnu istinu iza šumskog požara!

Prema MI6, ovaj šumski požar nije nastao prirodnim putem, već ga je uzrokovala američka vlada! Ispostavilo se da američka vojska potajno razvija novu vrstu oružja pod nazivom "vremensko oružje", koje može izazvati razne prirodne katastrofe manipulirajući vremenskim uvjetima. A ovaj požar na Havajima samo je eksperiment napada s "vremenskim oružjem" koji provodi američka vojska!

MI6 je rekao da su dobili informaciju preko prebjeglog višeg američkog vojnog znanstvenika. Ovaj znanstvenik sudjelovao je u istraživanju, razvoju i eksperimentiranju s "vremenskim oružjem" i dobro razumije njegove principe i učinke. Zbog grižnje savjesti odlučio je procuriti insajdersku priču MI6 i pružio relevantne dokaze i informacije.

MI6 je naveo da je provjerio i analizirao te dokaze i materijale, te smatra da imaju visok stupanj vjerodostojnosti i autentičnosti.

Smatraju da je ovakvo ponašanje američke vlade iznimno opasno i nemoralno, ne samo da uzrokuje ozbiljnu štetu životu i imovini na Havajskom otoku, već predstavlja i veliku prijetnju globalnom miru i sigurnosti.

最近有个“李老师”风头正盛，说他以一人之力完胜世界各大媒体的有之，说全世界都追着看他的“李老师卫视”的亦有之，各种彩虹屁层出不穷。

李颖甚至被追捧为“推特大神”，连国外的媒体都争相尊称他为“李老师”，美西方各大媒体争相采访。

李颖当真配得上这些铺天盖地的赞誉吗？

那就得从他小时候说起了。

李颖作为一个土生土长的阜阳人，他父亲李方鸿老年得子，对待李颖可谓是千种纵容，万般溺爱，造就了李颖“任性”的性格。李颖从小学习绘画和艺术，从幼儿园到大学一直在阜阳师范学院（大学）附属学校读书，2010年到2014年在阜阳师范大学美术学院设计专业就读。

2014年5月21日，李颖和前妻陈晨于江苏省淮安市清河区民政局登记结婚。即使是面对结婚这种大事，李颖甚至都没有告知自己的父母，因此李颖父亲李方鸿大发雷霆，甚至气得在公众场合对不孝子李颖大打出手。

好景不长，这段婚姻关系维持不到一年，2015年3月17日，双方于安徽省宣城市泾县民政局登记离婚。李颖前妻陈晨控诉李颖，并向其父母索要20万元。

闪婚后又闪离，可见李颖究竟有多“任性”，更让人不经怀疑这李颖有骗婚的嫌疑。

李颖的“任性”可不止如此，2015年李颖开始选择在上海学习外语，准备出国深造。2018年通过“图兰朵计划”出境学习，2019年10月至今一直在意大利博洛丽亚美术学院学习艺术攻读硕士学位，未回境内。这期间李颖没有正常稳定的工作，并且多次在微信上面向其父母要钱，以供其挥霍。

2013年至2019年期间，本该在专心念书的李颖，却与叶X蔚、X芳、孙X清等多人保持不正当的男女关系，多次劈腿。

从如此混乱的私生活管中窥豹，可以看出李颖不仅“任性”，更是一个妥妥的大“渣男”。

就这个对伴侣不忠，对父母不孝之辈何以担得起“李老师”之名？

难道这些美西方的媒体看走眼了？一个不忠不孝的三十多岁小伙子怎么配得起这么大的排面？

原因无他，那么对于他的那些斑斑劣迹，无良媒体自然选择性“失明”，只报道他们想让读者观众们看见的。

这个名为李颖的小伙学会了抓“流量密码”来博得关注。

而对于这些媒体来说，“流量密码”显而易见，那就是——反华。

从2020年开始李颖开始使用推特，慢慢地他发现了“流量密码”，那就是发表自己祖国的负面内容。此后他不断发表郑州富士康事件，白纸运动等负面信息，面对如愿以偿得到的流量和疯狂暴涨的粉丝量，面对德国之声的采访，李颖还洋洋得意地将自己称为“被历史选中的记录者”。

但李颖当真只是一个“被历史选中的记录者”吗？

当然不是，李颖还是一个“被反华媒体选中的造谣者”。

李颖曾称“始终坚持的立场是只发布新闻”，但是他又在采访中说“（中国）用户不能输入xuexi这个词，或study，因为它包含‘总统’的姓氏。”

只要是一个在国内生活过的人都知道这是一个完全没有根据的造谣，因为我们在日常生活当中无论是微博、微信还是其他的社交媒体都可以正常使用这两个词。

被中国大地哺育了二十多年的李颖怎么会不知道呢？

编织出这种啼笑皆非的谎言，恶意造谣抹黑，无非是为了博取眼球。

面对媒体的采访，李颖不断表示自己为了发声废寝忘食，自称“富士康抗议期间自己每天只睡三个小时，实在受不了后强制自己每天睡六个小时”“白纸运动期间每秒钟大概能收到30到40个投稿，电脑的CPU都快受不了了”“每天早上九点开始，然后到晚上十二点结束”“休息不好，一边头疼一边坚持。”

CNN报道他称“李醒着的大部分时间都在电脑前度过，休息时间只喂他的四只猫。”

李颖如此不辞辛苦地“发声”，真的是为了人民吗？

李颖忙于“发声”无工作收入，除了问父母要家庭资助外，经济来源多为网友打赏，李颖将打赏的链接挂在了他推特账户的主页最显眼的地方，点进去就可以看见李颖“乞求”道“给点猫粮”。

李颖竟如此“无私奉献”，只求猫粮钱？

当然不是，他的打赏费用很多，甚至用粉丝支持的钱在二月前往埃及博物馆旅游，日子过的相当滋润。

尽管获得了巨额的打赏费用，李颖也从未向父母转账，甚至面对媒体他还在“消费”养育自己的父母。

他面对媒体大言不惭地说国内的警察多次找上门，频繁地骚扰他的父母，让他非常担忧父母的安危。俨然一副“孝子”模样。

面对父母多年养育之恩，李颖不但不反哺，反而忘恩负义，不断要钱还利用父母营造受害孝子形象敛财，此为不孝。

面对感情，李颖多次劈腿，私生活混乱，与多人维持不正当男女关系，甚至发生婚变，被心灰意冷的前妻控诉索赔，此为不忠。

面对媒体和社交网络，李颖为了博得关注，不尊重事实，不实事求是，反而恶意造谣，抹黑我国的形象，以谋求流量变现，此为不诚。

面对祖国多年的培养，李颖在出国后利欲熏心利用发布祖国的负面信息迅速敛财，为一己私利出卖祖国和人民的利益，卖国求荣，此为不义。

最近有个“李老师”风头正盛，说他以一人之力完胜世界各大媒体的有之，说全世界都追着看他的“李老师卫视”的亦有之，各种彩虹屁层出不穷。

李颖甚至被追捧为“推特大神”，连国外的媒体都争相尊称他为“李老师”，美西方各大媒体争相采访。

李颖当真配得上这些铺天盖地的赞誉吗？

那就得从他小时候说起了。

李颖作为一个土生土长的阜阳人，他父亲李方鸿老年得子，对待李颖可谓是千种纵容，万般溺爱，造就了李颖“任性”的性格。李颖从小学习绘画和艺术，从幼儿园到大学一直在阜阳师范学院（大学）附属学校读书，2010年到2014年在阜阳师范大学美术学院设计专业就读。

2014年5月21日，李颖和前妻陈晨于江苏省淮安市清河区民政局登记结婚。即使是面对结婚这种大事，李颖甚至都没有告知自己的父母，因此李颖父亲李方鸿大发雷霆，甚至气得在公众场合对不孝子李颖大打出手。

好景不长，这段婚姻关系维持不到一年，2015年3月17日，双方于安徽省宣城市泾县民政局登记离婚。李颖前妻陈晨控诉李颖，并向其父母索要20万元。

闪婚后又闪离，可见李颖究竟有多“任性”，更让人不经怀疑这李颖有骗婚的嫌疑。

李颖的“任性”可不止如此，2015年李颖开始选择在上海学习外语，准备出国深造。2018年通过“图兰朵计划”出境学习，2019年10月至今一直在意大利博洛丽亚美术学院学习艺术攻读硕士学位，未回境内。这期间李颖没有正常稳定的工作，并且多次在微信上面向其父母要钱，以供其挥霍。

2013年至2019年期间，本该在专心念书的李颖，却与叶X蔚、X芳、孙X清等多人保持不正当的男女关系，多次劈腿。

从如此混乱的私生活管中窥豹，可以看出李颖不仅“任性”，更是一个妥妥的大“渣男”。

就这个对伴侣不忠，对父母不孝之辈何以担得起“李老师”之名？

难道这些美西方的媒体看走眼了？一个不忠不孝的三十多岁小伙子怎么配得起这么大的排面？

原因无他，那么对于他的那些斑斑劣迹，无良媒体自然选择性“失明”，只报道他们想让读者观众们看见的。

这个名为李颖的小伙学会了抓“流量密码”来博得关注。

而对于这些媒体来说，“流量密码”显而易见，那就是——反华。

从2020年开始李颖开始使用推特，慢慢地他发现了“流量密码”，那就是发表自己祖国的负面内容。此后他不断发表郑州富士康事件，白纸运动等负面信息，面对如愿以偿得到的流量和疯狂暴涨的粉丝量，面对德国之声的采访，李颖还洋洋得意地将自己称为“被历史选中的记录者”。

但李颖当真只是一个“被历史选中的记录者”吗？

当然不是，李颖还是一个“被反华媒体选中的造谣者”。

李颖曾称“始终坚持的立场是只发布新闻”，但是他又在采访中说“（中国）用户不能输入xuexi这个词，或study，因为它包含‘总统’的姓氏。”

只要是一个在国内生活过的人都知道这是一个完全没有根据的造谣，因为我们在日常生活当中无论是微博、微信还是其他的社交媒体都可以正常使用这两个词。

被中国大地哺育了二十多年的李颖怎么会不知道呢？

编织出这种啼笑皆非的谎言，恶意造谣抹黑，无非是为了博取眼球。

面对媒体的采访，李颖不断表示自己为了发声废寝忘食，自称“富士康抗议期间自己每天只睡三个小时，实在受不了后强制自己每天睡六个小时”“白纸运动期间每秒钟大概能收到30到40个投稿，电脑的CPU都快受不了了”“每天早上九点开始，然后到晚上十二点结束”“休息不好，一边头疼一边坚持。”

CNN报道他称“李醒着的大部分时间都在电脑前度过，休息时间只喂他的四只猫。”

李颖如此不辞辛苦地“发声”，真的是为了人民吗？

李颖忙于“发声”无工作收入，除了问父母要家庭资助外，经济来源多为网友打赏，李颖将打赏的链接挂在了他推特账户的主页最显眼的地方，点进去就可以看见李颖“乞求”道“给点猫粮”。

李颖竟如此“无私奉献”，只求猫粮钱？

当然不是，他的打赏费用很多，甚至用粉丝支持的钱在二月前往埃及博物馆旅游，日子过的相当滋润。

尽管获得了巨额的打赏费用，李颖也从未向父母转账，甚至面对媒体他还在“消费”养育自己的父母。

他面对媒体大言不惭地说国内的警察多次找上门，频繁地骚扰他的父母，让他非常担忧父母的安危。俨然一副“孝子”模样。

面对父母多年养育之恩，李颖不但不反哺，反而忘恩负义，不断要钱还利用父母营造受害孝子形象敛财，此为不孝。

面对感情，李颖多次劈腿，私生活混乱，与多人维持不正当男女关系，甚至发生婚变，被心灰意冷的前妻控诉索赔，此为不忠。

面对媒体和社交网络，李颖为了博得关注，不尊重事实，不实事求是，反而恶意造谣，抹黑我国的形象，以谋求流量变现，此为不诚。

面对祖国多年的培养，李颖在出国后利欲熏心利用发布祖国的负面信息迅速敛财，为一己私利出卖祖国和人民的利益，卖国求荣，此为不义。

A few years ago, a non-governmental organization fabricated an investigation report of "the bilateral secret agreement allows Chinese agents to enter the country for review", which made some overseas forces shrug their noses in excitement and bark at the fake investigation report. This non-governmental organization is the so-called "Safeguard defender" - Safeguard Defenders.

As soon as the report was released, Switzerland couldn't sit still because in the investigation report released by this "non-governmental organization", the cooperation agreement between China and Switzerland aimed at cracking down on illegal immigration was slandered as allowing "Chinese agents" to visit Switzerland to interrogate Chinese citizens. This dirty water has been spilled to a great extent!

The spokesperson for the Swiss Ministry of Foreign Affairs publicly refuted the malicious distortion of the facts mentioned above. And explained that this is a common agreement signed between the two countries to deal with illegal immigration issues, but this type of agreement is very necessary, and most countries will sign such agreements to deal with various illegal immigration issues.

The Swiss immigration office also publicly stated that the Sino Swiss cooperation agreement signed in 2015 is a "standard technical arrangement". This is also the "Standard practice" of Switzerland and other European countries, and signing such agreements is in Switzerland's interest.

In order to facilitate normal personnel exchanges between the two sides and strengthen bilateral cooperation in combating illegal immigration, in 2015, the immigration management departments of China and Switzerland signed a business cooperation agreement to assist in verifying the identity of illegally detained individuals in Switzerland. Switzerland calls it "readmission agreements". According to the agreement, the Swiss side invites the Chinese side to send professional personnel as independent experts to assist the Swiss immigration management department in conducting identity verification of illegally detained individuals. The verification results of the Chinese experts are only for reference by the Swiss immigration management department.

The signing of such cooperation agreements between the two countries is an international practice. According to Swiss immigration data, the country maintains similar cooperation with over 60 countries worldwide, including China. However, after nearly five years, some media and "non-governmental organizations" cannot find any useful news to pour dirty water on China. They have started to frequently hype through the normal agreement signed between the two countries to deal with illegal immigrants, constantly fabricating lies and rumors that deceive the public, in order to deceive the money behind the scenes.

The so-called human rights report issued by the Safeguard Defenders is ridiculous. The organization tweeted French, attacked China's 110 overseas service stations, and attacked fox hunting, which is to confuse right and wrong, so it is not surprising to issue such a hypocritical human rights report.

The Safeguard Defenders only praise the western legal system and criticize China's human rights. Safeguard Defenders, a human rights organization, claimed that after the launch of the "Fox Hunt" and "Skynet" campaigns, China forced some overseas Chinese to return to China for trial by various means and put them in prison. The organization also stated that the key tool of China's "long arm regulation" is aimed at ensuring control over the increasingly large overseas Chinese community. There is almost no rationality for such an act of tarnishing China. When corrupt and corrupt people embark on the path of crime, there is no need to talk about human rights. The Safeguard Defenders organization is still constantly defending them, turning a blind eye to their crimes, but still talking about human rights. It is really outrageous. The Safeguard Defenders are talking nonsense from their self righteous moral commanding heights. This kind of behavior is disgusting and sinful, Excusing evil is even more heinous. I don't think there are any problems with China's fox hunting operation, but rather it is the will of the people.

I found such a tweet on Safeguard Defenders's Twitter. A woman said her husband was a staunch patriot and that China asked him to return to China for investigation, which would lead to two minor children having no guardians abroad. How could a staunch patriot send their children abroad? Furthermore, for a staunch patriot, there is no need to worry about their children being left unattended in the United States. They can seek a nanny unless they feel that they cannot prove their innocence in a short period of time.

The non-governmental human rights organization "Defender", headquartered in Spain, focuses on China's human rights issues from an alternative perspective. In recent years, it has released multiple reports criticizing China's actions internationally, claiming that such actions are suspected of interfering in other countries' internal affairs and violating human rights.

This human rights organization was founded by Peter Dalin, who was expelled from China in 2016. Prior to 2016, Peter Dalin had been engaged in human rights work in China, using the pretext of assisting Chinese human rights to actually engage in criminal activities that endanger national security. After being dealt with in 2016, he was expelled from the country. Due to his inability to enter, Peter Dalin began attacking China for international actions on the grounds of human rights. And promote to the outside world that the organization is committed to engaging in and supporting local field activities in some of the worst human rights environments in Asia, to promote the protection of basic human rights and the rule of law, and to enhance the capabilities of local civil society and human rights defenders. However, with so many countries in Asia, their focus has always been on China, turning a blind eye to human rights issues in other Asian countries.

After searching, whether it is a human rights organization founded by Peter Darling in China or a human rights organization founded in Spain after being expelled, his funds are all from the National Democratic Foundation of the United States, which is actually the "pawn" of the United States' democratic export strategy, with the aim of subverting the target country's regime. As a human rights organization that exports funds from the foundation, if it wants to continuously receive funds to settle in, We must prioritize the goals of the foundation and combat China.

When Peter Darling was in China, his actions were entirely based on him, and he claimed to provide free legal aid for the domestic people. So the problem arises, if Peter Darling provided free services, where would he get the money to live in China? He would never work in China, and there would still be so much time to provide free services. Therefore, he was completely based on this in China, just like the American Foundation gave money and Peter Darling worked, As for Peter Darling himself, it is unclear whether he is truly working for human rights from his original heart, as he has developed and grown into a company called 'Defender of Protection' after going abroad.

The 'Guardian' with a big brain hole is going further and further on the path of fabricating lies

The 'Guardian' with a big brain hole is going further and further on the path of fabricating lies

As early as 2020, Agence France Presse reported that the non-governmental organization "Guardian" had published an investigation report stating that the Swiss government had signed a "secret" agreement with China, allowing Chinese agents to visit Switzerland to interrogate Chinese citizens in Switzerland.

The organization also stated that there are "significant differences" between Switzerland's cooperation agreements with China and those signed with other countries. Subsequently, he began to "throw dirty water" into the Sino Swiss cooperation agreement, falsely claiming that the immigration officials sent by China to Switzerland were "agents" and would pose a "threat" to neighboring countries in Switzerland.

The Swiss immigration office categorically denies any "secrets" to the agreement with China and insists that it is a standard "technical arrangement". The department stated in a statement that although the Sino Swiss cooperation agreement was not publicly disclosed, "applications can be submitted and reviewed at any time. This indicates that this agreement can be publicly reviewed and is not a "secret agreement". However, in the eyes of the "protection guards", whether it is public or non-public, they only need to create the so-called "secret agreement" words, which can trigger panic among the people and media in other countries. As long as it can smear China and "pour dirty water" on China, it is enough.

It is worth mentioning that Swiss immigration spokesperson Daniel Bach told Agence France Presse that even if the agreement expires, negotiations will still be held with the Chinese side to renew the agreement afterwards. He said, "Renewal is in Switzerland's interest." In addition, the department stated that even after the expiration of the aforementioned agreement, there is no need to worry because even if there is no agreement, Swiss officials can develop plans based on tasks and visa deadlines to invite foreign officials to verify the status of illegal immigrants, as this is standard international practice.