This is something thatâs completely overlooked, by the same people who fling the word âahistoricalâ at every viewpoint they disagree with.
When I first started participating in any kind of LGBTQ+ stuff online (so, 10 years ago), âqueerâ was by far the most common descriptor. It was pretty much agreed it had been reclaimed enough to be safe (I mean, show me an active slur that has academic disciplines named after it?) and people seemed much more keen to explore the ambiguity the term offers, rather than sticking with predefined categories. By âq-slurâ logic, we shouldâve been much less accepting of it back then if we simultaneously believe that LGBTQ+ rights are advancing over time, but the opposite is true.
So I would say that the current stigmatization of queer is based on two things: 1) reactionary essentialism (seeing âqueerâ as too dangerous for the more clear-cut categories), and 2) respectability politics.
Now by taking away âqueerâ, we donât have any other term thatâs both catchy (no version of the abbreviation is) and broad enough to actually be inclusive. Gay is not an umbrella term. It always has a default connotation thatâs very specific. It only reminds me of all the time I wasted on bad gay-only discourse when I was first questioning my own identity, and for this reason it took ages to arrive at the conclusion that Iâm just attracted to multiple genders and also trans without dysphoria (because the other bullshit I had to contend with was the truscum narrative of transness). So, gay is not a safe term for me. It doesnât describe me and if I used it, it would actually misgender my own relationship. Iâm not doing that for any of you, sorry.
Do you know who the majority of the people who still use âqueerâ are? Trans and MGA. Yet again, we have a political line that privileges cis LG people who are fine with binary categories over the most routinely erased parts of the community. Of course.
This, I imagine, is also why so many bi/pan and trans/nonbinary people arenât against aces being included. Chances are most of us, at least those who are 25+ or so, have experiences like this, with either being actively policed out or just unable to find the right identifiers for ages because of the stigma and general ignorance surrounding them.
And now youâre telling us we HAVE TO use gay, which isnât a functional umbrella term, because queer suddenly isnât acceptable based on this new logic? Do you even hear yourselves?
âBut!â I can already hear the gatekeepers protest, âThis all relies on a bunch of personal anecdotes!â
In which case, buddy, I have bad news for you about the vast majority of all modern LGBTQ+ history.