cherry valley forever
untitled

tannertan36
Fai_Ryy

roma★
trying on a metaphor

@theartofmadeline

titsay

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
official daine visual archive
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵

Discoholic 🪩
todays bird

gracie abrams
Claire Keane

pixel skylines
macklin celebrini has autism
$LAYYYTER

if i look back, i am lost
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from India

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Ukraine
seen from Ukraine
seen from Ukraine
seen from United States
seen from Ukraine
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Vietnam
seen from Denmark
seen from United States

seen from Bangladesh
@dnsassociatesuk

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Digital tax account: Cutting through the hype
There was a large degree of apprehension, both at the session and at the event in general, towards the DTA and HMRC’s API strategy. He wasn’t there to represent or defend HMRC
Read More - http://goo.gl/A7oIOg
VAT decision threatens charity’s future
The additional charge relates to the Catholic charity’s construction of ‘move on’ flats, designed to help homeless residents transition back to independent living. The VAT was incurred after HMRC reviewed the charity’s description of services, determining that their definition as a ‘residential and life skills center’ rather than a ‘homeless hostel’ left it subject to VAT. Established in 1962, Caritas Anchor House provides accommodation for 230 homeless people a year. It also works with vulnerable groups, including those experiencing substance misuse, domestic abuse and mental health problems. Responding to the decision Keith Fernett, the charity's chief executive, said: “HMRC’s application of #VAT in this case is devastating to our work and to the vulnerable people we support. We believe we’re being unreasonably penalized for accurately describing our operations despite not changing what we do. “We have worked incredibly hard to deliver a level of service with a reliance on donations and relatively little #government funding. We hope HMRC will #reverse its decision, and allow us to continue making a huge difference to people’s lives. Otherwise our work is at risk, and local authority services will be put under greater pressure”
DNS Associates
DNSAssociates provides information on auto enrolment,SSAS. and SERVICES like complex sharing and director's loan planning which no other accountants can provide.
Call us @ 020 3582 4950 for more information

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
NOW: Pensions unveils AE charge
Existing NOW: Pensions customers will not be affected by the charge even if they are staging in or after 2016.
At the same time the workplace pensions provider is launching a month-long consultation aimed at finding out the needs of small employers and will use feedback from the consultation to set the new fees.
The new proposition is likely to include online support such as screen share and live chat, longer contact center opening hours and a named individual to support employers.
Concern continues to grow that those firms yet to stage will have to turn to the government-backed NEST scheme as other providers struggle to make money out of smaller firms.
NEST is not currently planning to introduce a similar fee although it already charges the employee 1.8% up front.
According TPR figures, of the 1.8m employers yet to stage from now until 2018, two thirds employ between one and four workers while 16% employ between five and nine workers and 17% employ between 10 and 49 workers.
Bridge’s tax status: A ridge too far?
If you live in France, Holland, Belgium, Ireland or Poland, then bridge is accepted by the #tax authorities as a sport as far as VAT #exemption is concerned in relation to #competition entry fees paid to non-profit making bodies.
Unfortunately for UK based players, HMRC disagree and have always collected 20% VAT on competition fees. But is that about to change?#HMRC might be forced into a rethink because the Upper Tribunal has referred the issue to the European courts following the case of The#English Bridge Union Ltd (EBU) (case ref: UKUT0401), an appeal by the taxpayer after the First-tier Tribunal supported HMRC’s view that bridge was not a sport.
So what exactly is a sport? Must it always be linked to physical activity? This is one of the main arguments of HMRC ie that the EU Directive 132(1)(m) refers to ‘services closely linked to sport or #physical education by non-profit making #organisations’ – there is no mention of ‘mental education’ or mental benefits. I should add that part of the EBU’s argument is that the Charity #Commission accept that bridge is a sport in relation to s2(3)(d) of the Charities Act 2006.
Hodge appointed to head new tax responsibility committee
The cross-party group will also involve prominent MPs including former Conservative party chairman David Davis, Labour's John McFall, who formerly chaired the Treasury committee. Richard Bacon, the Conservative MP for South Norfolk who is currently a member of the PAC, will also be involved. The secretary for the group is Peterborough MP Stuart Jackson.
The group has pledged to explore the ways in which parliament can help to build and maintain the fair, sustainable and transparent tax system that is needed if individuals, businesses and markets are to create growth and prosperity both in the UK and internationally.
The move is backed by think tank CoVi and also has the support of Oxfam, CBI, Action Aid and CIPFA.
Hodge (pictured) said: "In recent years the issue of who pays tax and how much they pay has really struck a chord with the public. We want Parliament to continue to play a key role in building and maintaining the fair, sustainable and transparent tax system that is needed to create growth and prosperity both in the UK and internationally."
Hodge also added the committee would not clash with the work of her former committee, chaired by fellow Labour MP Meg Hillier.
Rogue HMRC investigator jailed for 12 months
Richard Barr was sentenced yesterday of misconduct in public office. Barr used his insider information to warn Darren Oliver and Wayne Cockerill, also from Birmingham, that tax scheme had been rumbled. Barr told them to destroy or hide evidence.
Barr had denied the charges against him but was found guilty of after a trial at Manchester Crown Court in January 2015.
“During the time you were an HMRC officer you became aware of the over half a million pound fraud perpetrated by good friends,” said Judge Robert Atherton in his sentencing. “You tipped them off and provided guidance and advice which they followed. As a former Police and Customs Officer you know the public expect a high level of integrity, and confidentiality is of prime importance. Your previous good character does not count.”
“As a criminal investigator, Richard Barr was expected to act with absolute honesty and integrity. Instead, he despicably abused his position. His actions were a gross abuse of the public’s trust,” said Joff Parsons, Head of HMRC’s Internal Governance Criminal Investigations.
HMRC's new API strategy explained
As a director at TaxCalc and chair of the software trade body’s accountants in practice group, Checkley has been heavily involved in developments around the way HMRC systems interact with third party software.
As presented by HMRC, the API strategy will open up the data within the department to a new generation of third party software suppliers. Rather than continuing to handle significant chunks of tax software development in-house, HMRC is hoping to improve the “customer” experience by harnessing the creativity and enthusiasm of app developers.
The fate of HMRC’s software strategy is currently in the hands of ministers undertaking Whitehall’s post-Budget spending review. But Checkley is hopeful that it will survive intact.
“We’re looking for advice from our clients, we have HMRC’s ear. There are some great opportunities. It’s not a given that if we ask for something HMRC would build it. It needs to benefit a lot of people - but if it does, then there’s absolutely every reason why HMRC would implement it.”

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Dividend tax petition ignores the real concern
George Osborne plans to scrap the current lower tax rates applicable to dividend income with a new £5,000 tax-free dividend allowance for all taxpayers. The change was also accompanied by increased tax rates on dividend income. The rates will be set at 7.5%, 32.5% and 38.1%, equivalent to an increase of 7.5% overall where dividend income exceeds £5,000.
The petition was initiated by Frauke Golding, who runs her own business as well as being a financial director and accountant. She wrote that the tax “flies in the face of risk and reward for running a business and contributing to the economy.
“There is a real danger that this new tax, along with auto enrolment and minimum wages increases, will have a significant effect on those people brave enough to start up a business that could make a meaningful contribution to the economy and jobs market.” The reality is the government has a majority and doesn’t need permission.”“My view is that the dividend tax is broadly fair, particularly when you consider the impact of the reductions in corporation tax that follow it,” she commented. “It is not a vast increase and still leaves companies and their owners paying less tax than the same business run as self-employed - with no particular justification for the differential.
Taxation is a political question
The central tenets of Laffer’s supply side economic theory argues for limiting government and cutting tax rates, especially the rate levied on top earners, which Laffer argues will unleash faster economic growth.
A curious artefact of Laffer’s thought is the eponymously named Laffer curve. The curve resembles a boomerang, plotting the tax rate and tax revenue on separate axes. The curve’s logic dictates that there’s a point where raising the top rate of tax becomes counterproductive, decreasing tax yield. It’s beguilingly elegant, a simple non-threatening curve that’s easy to understand at a glance.
The problem with the curve is its wrong on two levels, both mechanically and philosophically. For instance, the curve argues that a 100% tax rate would stop all activity – but that’s not strictly true, said Richard Murphy. He pointed out, that this was the model under which Soviet Russia operated. “As a policy, it was absurd – but it does suggest the curve was wrong,” he said.
“It’s fundamentally useless,” added Jolyon Maugham, a QC and economist who astutely deconstructed the Laffer curve in a recent blog post. “There is no one Laffer curve because it changes from day to day,” Maugham said.
7 mistakes to avoid with your accountancy website
Here then are the 7 most common observations I make and which can help explain why an accountant’s website isn’t doing all you want it to:
- Failing to make it easy for prospects to find what they want I don’t agree with those marketing people who claim you need to keep people on your website for as long as possible.
- Failing to say who YOU are So many accountancy sites have an ‘about us’ page that contains a pretty generic description of what could be almost any other firm in the UK
- ‘We ing’ all over the site Visitors need to know if they are on a website that offers services to people like them.
HMRC needs to show more empathy
Parliament makes the tax law, but HMRC design the tax compliance system including the tax forms and procedures for penalties and appeals. Recently HMRC have been inserting too many traps in the tax compliance system which they say are there to prevent unintended tax breaks, but which catch out unwary taxpayers.
The £100 automatic penalty for late submission of a tax return is a good example. Appeals against these penalties create a huge workload for HMRC, and the costs of dealing with those appeals must surely outweigh the penalties charged. There are no available statistics on how many of those automatic penalties are actually collected, or how much of that revenue is reinvested to reduce the number of taxpayers who struggle to comply.
A good start would be to communicate with tax agents by email, so that routine matters can be dealt with quickly.
Supremecourt to rule on VAT 'restitution' dispute
The trusts recovered some of the VAT they paid from the managers, who made ‘in time’ claims for refunds from HMRC, Deloitte explains in a summary of the case.
But after exhausting claims against the managers, the trusts pursued 'restitutionary' claims against HMRC - seeking payment of the difference between the gross VAT charged by the managers and the net sums repaid to them by HMRC. One of the issues in the case was a three-year (now four year) cap on claims in the VAT Act.
In #February, the Court of Appeal decided that the VAT Act capping provisions did not apply to the restitutionary claims but that they were confined to the net VAT paid to HMRC by the managers.
The Supreme Court will decide whether money payable to the trusts should take account of input VAT claimed by the managers at the time they (wrongly) #accounted for VAT on fees charged to the trusts and what time limit applies to the claims.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
HMRC fails to answer more than a quarter of phone calls
HMRC's chief executive apologized for the figures and said the revenue's service had not been "up to scratch". The #service has pledged to invest £45m in about 3,000 customer services staff. Another 2,000 staff will be moved temporarily from within the HMRC to help with the tax credits deadline and letters and forms, it said.
#HMRC set a target to answer 80% of calls. But the figures showed that in some months only about two in three (65.5%) of phone calls were answered. In September 20.8% of people heard busy tones and could not join a phone queue when they called, while 13.7% of calls were not answered.
In total 7.2 million calls made to the HMRC last year - 11% of all calls - ended with people hearing a busy tone.
Read More - http://goo.gl/w52KHN
Is HMRC prosecuting more VAT cases?
In a recent AnyAnswers post, taxwriter tried to gauge whether HMRC is changing its approach to cases where VAT has been deliberately underpaid. “I have heard of two cases recently where the client was questioned at a PoliceStation under caution under PACE [Police and Criminal Evidence act] rules with regard to underpaid VAT”.
Glennzy backed tax writer's suspicions, “I don’t really get involved much in this type of thing but know of others who do and have heard that there are incidents of relatively small amounts of tax with #HMRC seeking to prosecute particularly by VAT officers”.
“You always assume that criminal prosecutions only happen if the money involved is large sums like 5 figures,” Glenzzy added.
In the HMRC’s criminal investigations policy, it reads, “Criminal Investigation will be reserved for cases where HMRC needs to send a strong deterrent message or where the conduct involved is such that only a criminal sanction is appropriate.