Thoughts of a completely bored human :>

Privaty i think mama Park is not Daniel biological mother. I mean yes i am fan of theory Park Jinyoung + other woman = Park Hyungseok but it's just a theory so anyone want share with me comment why mama Park can't recognize Daniel even if she later said that his face when he was a child is coming out.

What if Daniel's grandma and mum both told him the truth, and more so mum told the truth, and grandma what she believes to be the truth. What if Daniel's grandma knew that he wasn't her son's son but Park Jinyoung's? This way she could think that Jinyoung killed her son out of jealousy or something.

What's the point of that you ask? Well, Park Jinyoung is known as one of the ten geniuses of Chrles Choi, MEDICAL GENIUS. What if Park Jinyoung was a doctor? We know that Daniel's "father" was sick (that's what Daniel's mother told her son), so Jinyoung might as well be his old friend's doctor.

I see it in two different scenarios

In the first, Daniel's father dies, and the grandmother, who knows that the doctor and also an old friend of her son's had some connection with Daniel's mother in the past, is also the biological father of her grandson. So Grandma told herself the tragic story of how Jinyoung was jealous and killed her son.

The second option (my favorite) looks like this. Jinyoung was treating "Daniel's father", but during the treatment something happened between him and Charles which caused the former to go into hiding, running away or something. After the doctor disappears (since he is called a medical genius, he must have been very good at what he did), Daniel's father dies, and the grandmother blames him for the death of her child.

This gives me two options. The first is that Dragon really didn't care much for his son and his lover/mother Luffy, which boldly ranks him as a bad parent/person (for me).

The second option is a bit more fun because it makes me think Luffy might just be a blooper or "wooopsie". (Sorry, English is not my first language so I really don't know how else to describe it.) In short, he was a wanted child, but not a planned one

The question is why?

We know practically nothing about Dragon's relationship with his colleagues / employees, and all assumptions about the mentor-subordinate relationship or Sabo's father-son relationship with Dragon are only fan assumptions. In fact, we don't know what it really looks like. And here many people can remind me that I am wrong etc.

And I may be wrong, but please pay attention to the beginning of my speech regarding the boss-employee relationship. The boss is the person responsible for all the people who work for him. It is a responsibility that does not always allow you to express your true thoughts (words, deeds, etc.), so the employer, as a person with a certain responsibility, often has to remain neutral (the more so because they are revolutionaries, about whom we know practically nothing, there may always appear some traitor or they may be eavesdropped or something similar). Imagine what would happen if, by some miracle, information leaked to the Government that Dragon cares more about one of his people …

What if Shanks came to the East Blue to kill Luffy?

Shanks is known to have connections with the government, but if the government found out about Luffy's existence when he was a child and tried to send someone from themselves or from the Navy, Dragon and / and Garp might have time to react. but such a pirate Shanks would be a better option for them after all, pirates do what they want and swim wherever they want. But for their misfortune, Shanks was held back by something. In my opinion it was either Luffy ate the fruit or the words Luffy said, the words that were said to be the same as those spoken by Roger. This theory assumes that Luffy and Shanks' promise to "meet again when the former is a great pirate" does not mean "meeting when you have achieved a lot" or "when you are high enough in the pirate hierarchy", but "when you are strong to beat me.

I like to think that by that promise Shanks was protecting Luffy somehow from the government until his 17th birthday (Luffy might have told him that was when he was planning to leave) and Luffy's 17th birthday was sort of like " Beginning of the Game "or" Here my protection ends now, defend itself, prove to me that I have spared your life in vain and meet me when you are ready. "

I mean, I understand why he didn't mess with him.

But why exactly with the grandfather?

Okay I understand that he probably didn't want to lose Luffy entirely either, but if he really wanted to keep him safe then I think it was much safer to leave Luffy with someone else, at some orphanage or even at someone's door. I also know that depending on the choice of the person, that doesn't guarantee Luffy would find a normal home, but it's still a 50 out of 50 chance.

Personally, I see it like this:

Someone is trying to attack Izuku while Izuku is already fighting several people at once, and there is no one else around to help him. And then Afo steps in, saving his life, to which everyone reacts with collective disorientation, and that is where the chapter ends. :D Or possibly the afo will reveal it in one of his monologues? I have no idea how else this could have happened.