🎀 Claire 🎀

Calling it fauxcest is hurtful. Its real to me.

codependent big sister who can't function without her little sister around

everyone is convinced theres some class of people who are ontologically evil and whos sole goal as a person is to rape children, instead of the much worse reality which is that sexual abuse of children is so commonplace it isnt even registered as such

Most people don't find the commonly accepted idea of a child rapist disturbing because child sexual assault is wrong, but because the idea of an adult who isn't the child's parent sexually assaulting them is a perversion of the parents inherent right to their child's sexuality

Reblogging this twice. The first one is because I’m a feminist and the second one is because I’m a pervert.

you cant consent while on cigarettes/ coffee and if you think you did youare a VICTIM

apple / orange juice too

remember the like tiny sliver of time when there was a real push to just say "people who have a uterus" or "people with testicles" or whatever when that was what you meant, and then faux-progressives who were willing to cave to terfism to avoid saying icky anatomy words ruined it with "AFAB-bodied"

literally just say dick when you mean dick. feeling uncomfortable with body parts and getting all euphemistic about it is conservatism by default.

Through the magic of specifying, for instance, "if you have a cock and balls then you may sometimes struggle with accidentally squeezing them in painful ways when sitting down" you also account for someone who got rid of her cock and balls surgically. Because get this. She No Longer Has That Anatomy. She is now outside the group defined as "people with cocks and balls".

On the other hand, instead of trying to contrive some anatomical grouping when what you really want to say is "trans women and cis men" without owning up to how awkward it is that you're making that particular grouping of identities, through the magic of introspection, you can think about why you're so desperate to do that!