Sade Olutola
JBB: An Artblog!
Game of Thrones Daily
if i look back, i am lost
Janaina Medeiros
oozey mess
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
macklin celebrini has autism
Not today Justin
Cosimo Galluzzi
Discoholic 🪩
todays bird
tannertan36
styofa doing anything
we're not kids anymore.
Claire Keane
Sweet Seals For You, Always
d e v o n
NASA
seen from Türkiye
seen from Portugal
seen from United States
seen from Chile
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from India
seen from T1
seen from Ukraine
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
@ckatmyla
okay y'all, I'm meeting Alan Tudyk next week, please vote for your Hottest Alan Tudyk Character so I can give him a top 5 list
Turbo/King Candy (Wreck-it Ralph)
Wash (Firefly/Serenity)
Alistair Krei (Big Hero 6)
Duke of Weselton (Frozen)
Duke Weasleton (Zootopia)
Van Wayne (Powerless)
Wray Nerely (Con Man)
Knowsmore (Ralph Breaks the Internet)
K-2SO (SW: Rogue One)
Dr. Harry Vanderspeigle (Resident Alien)
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
the scariest thing about old tv isnt really the racism or the sexisim because you kinda go in braced for that it's all the scenes where suddenly an actress is holding a lion cub or a chimpanzee is in the same room as a toddler, or suddenly theres a lion, or there's a chimpanzee again but it's driving a car, or holding a lighter, or holding fireworks. You just kind of watch in horror as over and over an actress performs with only 1960s tv film shootings best animal handling between her and the opening to Nope.
This is how I learn that the famous chimp my dad got my nickname from tried to kill Reagan. Fuck yeah.
Me, calling in to my shift supervisor: Gooooooood morning! Are we ready for another super splendiferous day with the public?! 😀
Her: That is too much energy
Me: It iiiiiis fake!! 😀
Her: Still too much energy
Did you just know this
maidens who poop vs. wenches who SHIT
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
hey folks, I’m gonna introduce you to two very important fandom terms and they are watsonian and doylist
they come (obviously) from the sherlock holmes fandom, and they are two different ways of explaining something in a story. say I’m a fan and I notice that, in the original books, watson’s war wound is sometimes in his leg and sometimes in his shoulder. the watsonian explanation is how watson (that is, a person within the story) might explain it; the doylist explanation is how sir arthur conan doyle (a person in real life) would have explained it.
sherlock explains the migrating war wound by making the shoulder wound real and the limp psychosomatic. the guy ritchie films explain it by having the leg wound sustained in battle before the events of the film and the shoulder wound happen onscreen. the doylist explanation, of course, is that acd forgot where the wound was.
this is very important when we’re discussing stuff like headcanons and word-of-god. I see this when people offer watsonian explanations for something, and then a doylist will say something like “it’s just because the author wrote it that way,” and I see it when a person is criticizing bad writing/storytelling (for example, the fact that quiet in metal gear solid v is running around the whole game in a bikini and ripped tights) and someone comes back with “but there’s an in-story reason why that happens!” (that reason being she breathes through her skin).
there’s nothing wrong with either explanation, and really I think you need both to understand and analyze a text. a person coming up with a watsonian explanation has likely not forgotten that the author had real-life reasons for writing something that way, and a person with a doylist interpretation is likely not ignoring the in-universe justification for that thing.
but it’s very difficult (and imo often useless, though there are exceptions) to try to argue one kind of explanation with the other kind. wetblanketing someone’s headcanon with “or it could just be bad writing” is obnoxious; dismissing someone’s criticism with “but have you considered this in-universe explanation” is ignoring the point of the criticism. understanding where someone is coming from is important when making an argument; acting like your argument is better because you’re being doylist when they’re being watsonian or vice versa is not.
it’s been 5 million years but this thing still gets notes with like “can someone explain this to me in a shorter, easier way” so here it is:
watsonian: the enchantress cursed the eleven-year-old prince from beauty and the beast and all of his servants because fairies don’t understand why humans would think that’s insane and unfair. I am using in-universe evidence to explain why the character might think or act a certain way, as if belle and the prince and the enchantress are real people.
doylist: the writers didn’t realize that the prince would have been eleven when he was cursed until it was too late to change it, and the servants are also cursed because talking furniture is funny and allows for unique character design. I am explaining this plot point based on an outside knowledge of how writing works and how writers think.
alternate short explanation:
on the Watsonian level, John Watson wrote the Sherlock Holmes stories, about people Watson met.
on the Doylistic level, Arthur Conan Doyle wrote the Sherlock Holmes stories, about characters Doyle made up.
i think dipper and mabel were like that
I think Stan and Ford were like that.
the average twitter vs tumblr community experience
IT FUCKIN YURI DAAAAAAAAAAAY
GMORNIN IT'S MOTHERFUCKIN YURI DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY
Image transcript:
Yuri Day (百合の日) takes place on June 25th in Japan and celebrates yuri works. The day came to be as Japanese yuri fans noted that June 25th was the assigned day for the lily, which is where yuri (百合 lit. lily) gets its name from.
From: Yuri Day, Fanlore
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
the stars and the universe love you
But they don't know you've come out as gay
Which one of these is/was more embarrassing for you?
accidentally calling a teacher/other adult 'Mommy'
Saying someone else's name when frustrated with a person
Saying I love you to random stranger on the phone
Repeating a phrase you say at work out of context
some other thing (comment please)
the stars and the universe love you
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
bears
Joy and whimsy detected! This post is joyful and whimsical!
the worst part of summer is that people get sooo comfortable expressing their disgust at having to see other people’s bodies. they’re always complaining about wrinkly old men at the nude hot springs or fat women in bikinis at the beach. I hate that shit. if you’re not capable of being normal about bodies you personally don’t find attractive, just turn your head to look at something else! and if you’re not smart enough to do that, then at least do the rest of us the courtesy of suffering in silence, because we don’t wanna hear your weird comments. thanks.
