C̶h̶a̶n̶e̶l̶ ♱

Their basis is that they *have* to hear a cis person talk about trans issues or topics, or else it’s a “TiM” and “bad”.

Be so for real…

First of all, instead of listening to what I say, you just attack things about me (online school, sexuality, and race even).

You blocked me right after I called you out for questioning my own race, because you KNEW how weird it was to do.

Finally, me giving you sources in an ask, to hopefully get you to back off isn’t a “okay lol” response type of situation.

Shame on you and any of your little fans, you all disgust me. Hate revolting all you want but you DON’T snoop down to attacking others’ personal lives.

Evidence 1

Evidence 2

Evidence 3

You think the people at the Boston Massacre just peacefully whispered at those British soldiers or something?

You think the French Revolution would’ve been done with rainbows and sunshine?

@sossegato

Y’all are starting to get weirdly defensive over things and it’s creeping others, even women, out.

You don’t need to say cuss words or insults to get your points across, or act like a mentally unstable adult towards an autistic minor.

Maybe put the Andrea Dworkin down and pick up a self help book.

If you’re not this, then you’re not a “Puritan” or “Puriteen” (anyone who uses that term for you is a creep in my eyes).

Puritanism and Purity Culture are not the same thing and I don’t know how y’all got the two confused.

Purity Culture was supposed to meant misogynistic experiences in the Christian sphere, and was a term mainly used by ex Christians.

Puritanism is a religious movement from the late 16th and 17th centuries, that aren’t as “purity centric” as people thought they were.

Oh, read this too because maybe some of y’all are basing things based off of myths?

You’re actively demonizing a whole belief system just because some teens on the internet rightfully don’t like taboo things at their age.

If you’re saying something, then say it with your full chest AND let me say my response.

Anyways, Puritanism is a real religion, and it’s not just “purity culture”, you know?

How is it damaging human life and reality (and I mean the actual religious belief, not just “purity culture”)?

Fiction isn't reality

Having a kink or fantasy isn't the same as wanting or doing the actual thing

Fantasies don't predict reality or we'd all be rich

Thought crimes aren't real

Some people have kinks and/or fantasies you personally find icky, but you don't have a right to tell them not to

Some people with trauma work their shit out in ways that you personally find icky, but you don't have a right to tell them not to

Conservatives will take advantage of your desire to be seen as a Good Person™️ to push you to the right

You are responsible for curating your online experience

Censorship is inevitably racist, sexist, homophobic, and transphobic

LOUD INCORRECT BUZZER 💔

She literally called the vice president of the Confederacy (Alexander Hamilton Stephens) “cute”.

She’s also friends with someone (that Chanel blog) who called Jefferson Davis (the Confederate president) “hot”.

She’s obviously trying to squeeze her way into our spaces in order to make her Pro-Secession mindset more “acceptable”.

She disgusts me as a POC womyn myself, who has enslaved ancestors.

(The person I’m talking about is Officialfrevblrpage24, if any other radfems wanted to be aware)

That makes more sense. You confused me a bit with the "neo-confederate" accusation, thanks for the context. I don't know if calling someone hot would equal supporting the actions of the person, though. Doesn't Hamilton have a whole fanbase, kinda like Napoleon?

Please show me what post or posts you saw and I can probably explain myself.

I only drooled over Mr. Stephens and Mrs. Davis, to be honest, I won’t deny that.

All I asked was one example, one post, and I’ll be able to explain myself.

I’m in the ACW fandom, of course I post about the figures, from both sides, even from the Union.

How is my blog brainrot? All I do on it is talk about old books, web graphics, ACW fandom stuff, other history fandom stuff, and educating others on LGBT+ rights.

It’s never this deep when it comes to TikTok slang of all things.

And yes, I’m 14/15 years old, but that doesn’t mean that I don’t have a brain.

Radfems have always told me to shut up, but as soon as I do it the way they do, suddenly I’m the bad guy.

I don’t have to act like how you want me to act.

I’ve been way past that point.

Second of all, it’s Radical Feminists, not feminists in general. I’m Intersectional Feminist by the way.

EDIT: Oh, look!

What’s the “bullshit” so that I can avoid it?

Anti-feminist posts while calling yourself a feminist. You don't even know who Dworkin is

Gender ideology

Confederate posting

The people you keep interacting with

Reblogging misinformation about biology

Posts about autogynephilia that you are too young to talk about and clearly uneducated about

Reblogging anime gore

Reblogging dd/lg shite

Defending the most obvious trolls

And finally, some of my personal favs.

2. I can do “Confederate posting” if I want to, my blogs aren’t 100% Union centered.

3. What misinformation about biology? What I’ve reblogged before is true as hell, any scientist would say that.

4. What dd/lg stuff? Still awaiting evidence.

5. What’s wrong with Robespierre? He seems like a fine guy.

She literally called the vice president of the Confederacy (Alexander Hamilton Stephens) “cute”.

She’s also friends with someone (that Chanel blog) who called Jefferson Davis (the Confederate president) “hot”.

She’s obviously trying to squeeze her way into our spaces in order to make her Pro-Secession mindset more “acceptable”.

She disgusts me as a POC womyn myself, who has enslaved ancestors.

(The person I’m talking about is Officialfrevblrpage24, if any other radfems wanted to be aware)

That makes more sense. You confused me a bit with the "neo-confederate" accusation, thanks for the context. I don't know if calling someone hot would equal supporting the actions of the person, though. Doesn't Hamilton have a whole fanbase, kinda like Napoleon?

Please show me what post or posts you saw and I can probably explain myself.

I only drooled over Mr. Stephens and Mrs. Davis, to be honest, I won’t deny that.

All I asked was one example, one post, and I’ll be able to explain myself.

I’m in the ACW fandom, of course I post about the figures, from both sides, even from the Union.

How is my blog brainrot? All I do on it is talk about old books, web graphics, ACW fandom stuff, other history fandom stuff, and educating others on LGBT+ rights.

It’s never this deep when it comes to TikTok slang of all things.

And yes, I’m 14/15 years old, but that doesn’t mean that I don’t have a brain.

Radfems have always told me to shut up, but as soon as I do it the way they do, suddenly I’m the bad guy.

I don’t have to act like how you want me to act.

I’ve been way past that point.

Second of all, it’s Radical Feminists, not feminists in general. I’m Intersectional Feminist by the way.

EDIT: Oh, look!

What’s the “bullshit” so that I can avoid it?

Anti-feminist posts while calling yourself a feminist. You don't even know who Dworkin is

Gender ideology

Confederate posting

The people you keep interacting with

Reblogging misinformation about biology

Posts about autogynephilia that you are too young to talk about and clearly uneducated about

Reblogging anime gore

Reblogging dd/lg shite

Defending the most obvious trolls

And finally, some of my personal favs.

2. I can do “Confederate posting” if I want to, my blogs aren’t 100% Union centered.

3. What misinformation about biology? What I’ve reblogged before is true as hell, any scientist would say that.

4. What dd/lg stuff? Still awaiting evidence.

5. What’s wrong with Robespierre? He seems like a fine guy.

She literally called the vice president of the Confederacy (Alexander Hamilton Stephens) “cute”.

She’s also friends with someone (that Chanel blog) who called Jefferson Davis (the Confederate president) “hot”.

She’s obviously trying to squeeze her way into our spaces in order to make her Pro-Secession mindset more “acceptable”.

She disgusts me as a POC womyn myself, who has enslaved ancestors.

(The person I’m talking about is Officialfrevblrpage24, if any other radfems wanted to be aware)

That makes more sense. You confused me a bit with the "neo-confederate" accusation, thanks for the context. I don't know if calling someone hot would equal supporting the actions of the person, though. Doesn't Hamilton have a whole fanbase, kinda like Napoleon?

Please show me what post or posts you saw and I can probably explain myself.

I only drooled over Mr. Stephens and Mrs. Davis, to be honest, I won’t deny that.

All I asked was one example, one post, and I’ll be able to explain myself.

I’m in the ACW fandom, of course I post about the figures, from both sides, even from the Union.

How is my blog brainrot? All I do on it is talk about old books, web graphics, ACW fandom stuff, other history fandom stuff, and educating others on LGBT+ rights.

It’s never this deep when it comes to TikTok slang of all things.

And yes, I’m 14/15 years old, but that doesn’t mean that I don’t have a brain.

Radfems have always told me to shut up, but as soon as I do it the way they do, suddenly I’m the bad guy.

I don’t have to act like how you want me to act.

I’ve been way past that point.

Second of all, it’s Radical Feminists, not feminists in general. I’m Intersectional Feminist by the way.

EDIT: Oh, look!

What’s the “bullshit” so that I can avoid it?

Anti-feminist posts while calling yourself a feminist. You don't even know who Dworkin is

Gender ideology

Confederate posting

The people you keep interacting with

Reblogging misinformation about biology

Posts about autogynephilia that you are too young to talk about and clearly uneducated about

Reblogging anime gore

Reblogging dd/lg shite

Defending the most obvious trolls

And finally, some of my personal favs.

2. I can do “Confederate posting” if I want to, my blogs aren’t 100% Union centered.

3. What misinformation about biology? What I’ve reblogged before is true as hell, any scientist would say that.

4. What dd/lg stuff? Still awaiting evidence.

5. What’s wrong with Robespierre? He seems like a fine guy.

Just flipping the biological sex from “male” to “female” on things doesn’t make it automatically better.

And don’t even think about guilt tripping me in the comments, YES I would say what I said above in people’s faces proudly.

Apparently, people like my friend Brook can’t even say their opinions anymore without being told that they don’t deserve kindness.

Like, if you really want women and girls to have a voice, then let people like my friend Brook have one.

Thanks for showing everyone yet again that RadFems don’t care about us unless we say what they want to hear.

P.S., Female Supremacy as an IDEA is bad, nobody said that it existed.

1. I’m unlabeled and gynosexual.

2. I’m autistic, which I’m grateful for.

3. Gynosexual and Lesbian are two different things.

4. Just because I’m autistic, doesn’t mean that I’m ultra-vulnerable and can’t understand things.

5. If DNI says DNI, then don’t interact.

6. Feminism is about both liberation AND equality.

7. I’m not backing down from any of the points above.

8. Y2K means “2000”, not “all of the 2000s”.

9. TERFs and Gender Criticals aren’t valid and go by outdated logic.

10. Trans rights are human rights whenever you like it or not.

11. Whipping Girl isn’t that bad of a book from what I’ve heard and seen.

12. I’ll keep calling myself a feminist whenever I want to.

13. Female Supremacy goes against feminism.

14. Misandry goes against feminism. (If it doesn’t exist, then why call yourself a “misandrist”?)

15. Candy corn and conversation heart candy isn’t that bad and actually tastes really good in my opinion.

16. TikTok doesn’t understand subcultures correctly 90% of the time.

17. The modern internet killed Y2K’s actual meaning.