In the words of @lululeninn "CHARGE!!! TAKE NO PRISONERS!!!"
Not today Justin

titsay
Mike Driver
One Nice Bug Per Day
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Three Goblin Art

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

blake kathryn
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

JBB: An Artblog!

izzy's playlists!

Kaledo Art
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Misplaced Lens Cap
Sade Olutola
sheepfilms

Origami Around
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Show & Tell

PR's Tumblrdome

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Finland
seen from Venezuela
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Slovakia
seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Netherlands
seen from Germany
@cat-a-holic
In the words of @lululeninn "CHARGE!!! TAKE NO PRISONERS!!!"

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
[freezeframe]
You may be wondering how I got into this situation. That's good. Keep wondering. If you pay close attention to the rest of this movie and employ your critical thinking skills, you may find that the answer unfolds as it goes along. Sometimes it's good not to know yet, and to wonder. Sometimes that's the entire point.
[unfreezeframe]
Coelacanth Doll 3D Cross Stitch Sewing Pattern by robinsdesign
if you are going to need some kind of sedative for 4th of july fireworks for your pets NOW IS THE TIME TO SCHEDULE THOSE APPOINTMENTS TO ASK FOR THEM
NOT WHEN ITS 2 DAYS AWAY
I feel like to really get this circulating as it should, we need it superimposed over the picture of the turkey going in the fridge. (I can't do it I'm on my phone.)
With the 250th anniversary it's likely to be especially bad this year!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
people saying “don’t use your full government name for your ao3”, “create different emails for work and personal use” but personally I think it’s both sad and dystopian how capitalism/companies/even schools think they have the rights to cross your personal boundaries and insert themselves into your personal life. like, I get it, safety wise, why checking digital footprints can be important sometimes. but a gay fanfiction is not a fucking threat that could ever cause anybody harm. it’s funny (not really, it’s still sad and dystopian) how they now think they can control your personal life and prevent you from having hobbies
Thing is, speaking from experience as a professional writer, universities and potential employers are afraid of anything that might reflect badly on them. Which is why they scour the Internet for the social media and websites, and, yes, hobbies, of applicants.
You should never, ever, EVER use your real, legal name online for anything other than job hunting sites (i.e. Linked In). Because people can and will find your fanfics and fanarts. And even if it's the most vanilla thing online, regular, every-day people don't understand fandom. They stereotype all fannish people as weirdos living in their parents' basement. They see the worst sides of fanfiction and fanart and believe it's all horrible.
They're not controlling you. They can't stop you from writing or drawing fan fics and art, and they're not trying to. What they are doing is deciding they don't want to be associated with people who have those hobbies. Which, as private businesses, which a university is, they have every right to do. This person was lucky the uni just asked him to remove most of his fanfics and still accepted him. They could have rejected him completely.
No one is obligated to hire you.
So if you don't want to risk rejection from colleges, universities, or jobs, DO NOT USE YOUR LEGAL NAME. Create a pseudonym or two, or three, and never share them with people you meet IRL. That's what I do.
The big key is that we absolutely failed as a society to teach these young people early on the immense consequences that can result from using your real name on the internet. When I was in elementary school learning internet safety nearly twenty years ago, we were merely taught that you should never use your real name on websites because predators could be lurking around every corner. This is demonstrably true, as we have seen, but this rhetoric also ignores the even likelier possibility that businesses and universities will find your presence on the internet and reject you categorically. Fast forward just a few years in the future from where I was, and you'll find that no one was even teaching these kids internet safety at all. They really grew up believing nothing would happen to them, and then found out the hard way how untrue that is.
Baltimore Catechism comes in handy again; have you ever been in a situation where you know someone is doing something wrong, but you're not sure to what extent you are obligated to express your concern about that action? Some guy at a party casually mentioning he takes stuff from work, a friend of a friend asks if you want a tarot reading done, etc? Well, the commentary for Q. 222 says:
We are obliged to [admonish the sinner] in the following circumstances: First. When his fault is a mortal sin. Second. When we have some authority or influence over him. Third. When there is reason to believe that our warning will make him better instead of worse.
So you're probably not obligated to tell tell a friend of a friend that you have just met that they shouldn't do tarot, but you probably are obligated to, say, express your concern to a good friend about their amount of alcohol intake. I think the third criterion is interesting, because while it can be read as a 'get get out jail' free card ("I shouldn't say anything, because they'll just double down on their pet sin"), I think it is more useful as a challenge to ask ourselves: "Is there a way that I can brooch this topic in a way in a way that is loving, and in a way that the other person can really hear what I am trying to say?"
“[Mum] says it’s too easy to call people evil instead of their choices, and that lets people justify making evil choices, because they convince themselves that it’s ok because they’re still good people overall, inside their own heads.”
So wrong. Matt needs to read John 11:35. Biblical men are extremely expressive. Stoicism as masculinity is a western idea. Expressing emotions is not a gendered facet of humanity
I usually agree with things I see from Walsh, but this one has me itching to break a cast iron skillet over his head.
Jesus wept. You saying the King of kings, the LORD of Heaven’s Armies, is acting like a woman (derogatory)? He in His humanity is our ideal as a species, He as Christ is YOUR (men’s) ideal as a husband, and you say this behavior He exhibited is beneath the male ideal?
…
Come here. There’s a logo on the bottom of this pan, I think you should see it.
The post this stems from is even worse.
Walsh should tell that to the American soldiers who broke down and wept upon hearing the news of the Japanese surrender in 1945 as they were preparing to board the planes for the invasion. They cried because they realized that they were going to be allowed to live the rest of their lives instead of bring torn to shreds by gunfire as they planned.
How dare somebody get emotional after a robbery when they have a moment to take in what happened. He's thinking about how his entire life could have just been taken. His future wife, future kids who he'd never know because they would never exist, all of his future experiences for the next half century were in the hands of a senseless, violent maniac.
And for the people countering about how men need to demonstrate their ability to be protectors, this isn't about that. This isn't to say you should have a breakdown during a stressful event. You can handle your business and do what is necessary and then release some emotion afterwards when the danger has passed.
I'd rather see a man cry from frustration than see the back of his hand because he thinks he needs to deal with his emotions in a more "manly" way.
Okay, so this post keeps coming back to my mind, and it's occurred to me that this man who claims Christ is actively pushing men to be proud.
Yeah, yeah, we can pull out the whole Jesus wept thing. He cried for Lazarus, and He cried for Jerusalem. But He is hardly the only man who has cried. Jeremiah earned himself the moniker "the weeping prophet." David was moved to tears when brought face to face with his sin. Elijah cried about his situation. The Bible does not shame men for their tears. There is no verse that says women must remain the sex to cry while men must remain stoic, with the exceptions of birth and death. There is no verse.
The Bible does not promote the idea that you must have it all together. In fact, it speaks to being honest, sharing burdens with people of the church. While there is something to be said for men and women groups in a church, the Bible very clearly does not say burdens must not be shared with a spouse. By refusing to cry in front of your wife, you are not upholding a picture of Godly masculinity, but rather are using masculinity as an excuse to be proud.
You don't want to look weak or vulnerable in front of the one you are one with? Like seriously, your wife, your husband, is one with you. The Bible clearly states that. And that is the person you will not be vulnerable in front of? Whatever for? It boils down to pride. Matt Walsh is promoting and endorsing prideful behavior, when as Christians, we are not supposed to.
"We can't look weak to the women"- your Savior was beaten, stripped, and hung on a cross for a criminal's death for all to see, and you know which disciples sat and watched? Who did not lose respect? Who did not lose love? The women. The women were right there, watching Jesus at His weakest and most vulnerable moment. And Matt would have men remain stoic around their wives. So they don't look weak.
Have some humility.
There are times when tears must be held back. There are times when it goes from emotional overflow to just being whiny. That is true regardless of gender. That does not mean men should not cry in front of their wives. Yes, some men are naturally more stoic, and there's nothing wrong with that. But for heaven's sake, that is not some arbitrary standard for all men.
And for the argument of, "Well, every woman I've cried in front of found it repulsive," I will say this- if you teach men that it is unmasculine to cry, you teach women it is unattractive in a man. It's not a justification for that behavior- but I would hardly call it a natural response. This whole thing isn't a biological reality. It's a cultural view, and one that runs counterculture to what Christianity teaches.
I love this thread and more people need to see it because I'm so sick of the narrative that men can't freaking cry. If men aren't supposed to have emotions, WHY DO THEY HAVE THEM?????????
Ignatius of Loyola, founder of the Jesuits, was a former mercenary soldier, and preached in places that skinned people alive for minor property crimes. His hobby was planning the final, decisive crusade to retake the Holy Land.
He also cried so much whenever he was strongly affected by basically any feeling, that he needed eye surgery to keep from going blind.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
hmm my former landlords are trying to deduct a frankly off the rails amount of money from our security deposit…my time has come once again
i was chatting with a coworker about this whole saga today and someone nearby popped into the convo to be like “you know, you can use chatgpt to write a demand letter!” and i sort of blinked and went, “okay. i did it myself, though.” and she was like, “yeah but it can tell you what laws and stuff are relevant” and i was like, “i also did research myself.” and she was very well-meaning but she said “chatgpt” like six more times before she left and it was genuinely baffling to me, this insistence on it.
and in the one hand, did i enjoy spending hours researching housing regulations in my state? not especially. drafting this email was stressful. but on the other hand, did i learn a lot by doing that research? yeah, i did. i’m more prepared for my current and future leases. i used some of that info to make decisions about a new renter’s insurance policy. i already told three different people about things i learned that are relevant to their leases that they didn’t know yet. (pro tip: see if you’re supposed to be getting annual interest payments on your security deposit! also look up what specific appliances your landlords must legally provide as of 2026.) i also got to reconnect with my cousin for a bit because her job gave her specific insight on part of the situation, and i’d much rather do that than have a chatbot make shit up for me.
also, i drafted that email with the power of friendship (friends angry on our behalf) and spite (from landlords telling me not to do my research). chatgpt could never.
(we got the money back, by the way 💪)
Please never use generative AI tools for any kind of legal dispute. It does not know what laws or court cases are. It will make up something that sounds favorable to you, and you will get crushed. There are free resources out there to learn this stuff. And sometimes attorneys will offer free consultations or volunteer at a free legal clinic. OP didn't just do it themselves to do extra work or some shit. This is really the only viable way to do things short of hiring a professional to do it for you.
ChatGPT is not easier or faster in matters like this. It is a shot to the foot.
I luv them 💖🌌✨
Based on this picture:
Days to complete: 3
Made in Clip Studio Paint
Tablet: Wacom
A little sleeping kitty
Saint Emily de Vialar
1797-1856
Feast Day: June 17
Patronage: single women
Saint Emily de Vialar was born in France, to the physician of Louis XVIII. She cared for the children and sick of the town, trying to repair the harm done by the French Revolution, while also caring for her widowed father. In 1835, St. Emily and 26 women took religious vows, calling themselves the sisters of St. Joseph “of the Apparition.” (referring to The angel Gabriels’ telling St. Joseph to flee to Egypt) By the time St. Emily died, 42 foundations were established all over the world. Four years after her death her body was found incorrupt.
Prints, plaques & holy cards available for purchase. (website)
speculative fiction writers i am going to give you a really urgent piece of advice: don't say numbers. don't give your readers any numbers. how heavy is the sword? lots. how old is that city? plenty. how big is the fort? massive. how fast is the spaceship? not very, it's secondhand.
the minute you say a number your readers can check your math and you cannot do math better than your most autistic critic. i guarantee. don't let your readers do any math. when did something happen? awhile ago. how many bullets can that gun fire? trick question, it shoots lasers, and it shoots em HARD.
you are lying to people for fun. if you let them do math at you the lie collapses and it's no fun anymore.
YOU GET IT

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
There’s a spider in your computer. Her name is Astrid. She heard the World Wide Web needed a World Wide Spider, but she needs some help getting to each place. Can you reblog her to help her get everywhere?
me studying anything in history