What are your thoughts on the "cut what you love" idea?
Hello there! (I love your hair âĽď¸)
I assume you mean âcut what you loveâ during the revision process, right? I prefer to call it âkill your darlings.â In the past I have talked about editing (or chopping) out parts of the story that may not be effectiveâ even if you like them, or enjoyed writing them. You can read more about my feelings, here c;
Instead, I want to spend this time to tackle the misconception of âcut what you love.â
It doesnât mean what some people think it means.
Those of you who have seen my Top 5 Tips For Revision know that the overall message of that post was that (during the revision process) you must be able to look at your work objectively.
That is the exact same sentiment from which the advice âkill your darlingsâ (or the misinterpreted âcut what you loveâ) comes from. The reality is that, from time to time, we end up writing things that may not be necessary, or effective, to the story.
I can already tell that someone is rolling their eyes at me, and thatâs okay~ we can all have different opinions on this. What counts as âimportantâ and ânot importantâ is entirely subjective. I get thatâ but during the revision process you HAVE to be able to look at your writing and ask:
"Does this really need to be here? And if the answer is yes, am I choosing to keep this passage/paragraph/element because I believe the story is better because of it⌠or is it because I am attached to the time and effort I spent writing it?"
That is seriously the key to creating the best story possible: donât waste the readerâs time with things that are not important to the story. This is also the secret for improving pacing. Again, I can feel that some of you may be taking my words wrongly, so let me clarify as to what I am NOT saying:
I am NOT saying that you have to dumb-down your story.
I am NOT saying that you have to sacrifice your artistic vision
I am NOT saying that you have to cut everything that you love
What is your job as a writer? To tell a compelling story.
What is your job as a writer? To tell a compelling story.
Let me tell you about my first book. When I wrote the first draft of Ravensgem the opening was A LOT more different than it is now. It was a long, and epic retelling of the birth of Gadeen (the fantasy world where the story takes place). It was big, and expansive, and full of magical realism. I liked it. I loved writing it. But when I started editing the book that opening stood out like a sore thumb.
I didnât want to chop out the entire opening of the book, I mean I nearly killed myself trying to get that first line rightâ you know? I didnât want to just throw all of that work down the drainâŚ
But that was exactly what I had to do.
I gave the book time. I let it sit. I came back and I looked at it objectively. I looked at it as though it had been written by someone else. I looked at the book as a whole, and I realized that opening had to go. Yeah, it was epic. Yeah it was fun to writeâ but Ravensgem was not about an epic fantasy world and the history that brought it to life. It was a story about people, about a young man choosing strife over safety and about a young woman choosing love over wealth.
I rewrote the opening into what it is today. I had fun. I enjoyed it. And I created something better than what was there before.
This is the entire point of revision.
Is it hard to chop out days (if not weeks) of âworkâ? Of courseâ but you need to remind yourself why you are doing all of this for:
To tell a compelling story.
I donât know about you, but I want my stories to be awesome. I want my stories to be the best they could possibly be. And that sometimes means that you have to take out the entire opening of a book and start from scratch. Why? Why do all of this? Why go through all of this trouble? Because, at the end of the day, you are doing this⌠to tell a compelling story.
I hope this helps! If you, or any other writerly friend, has any more questions make sure to send them my way!