Was driving with my grandmother and in broken English she says “no eyes… no nose… no face. Don’t trust.” To which I looked around wildly in search of this omen of ill portend.
Cybertruck. It was a cybertruck.
Claire Keane
hello vonnie
wallacepolsom
🪼
taylor price
Stranger Things


Kaledo Art
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
AnasAbdin
dirt enthusiast
Monterey Bay Aquarium

#extradirty
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
DEAR READER
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Mike Driver
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

ellievsbear

seen from Australia
seen from Chile

seen from Japan
seen from Russia

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from France

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from South Korea
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Sri Lanka
seen from Ireland
seen from France

seen from United States
@callmemanatee
Was driving with my grandmother and in broken English she says “no eyes… no nose… no face. Don’t trust.” To which I looked around wildly in search of this omen of ill portend.
Cybertruck. It was a cybertruck.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
This is true of the manga, but I love how the anime accentuates the absolute physical trust the apprentices have with Qifrey. Specifically with Agott, the way she is so ready when Qifrey says “hang on tight, I need my hands free” to cling to him a mile into the sky, and then in the latest episode, how, as soon as she impacts Qifrey while flying to him, she makes no move to save herself, she just curls into him and trusts that he will keep them from falling.
And I think it works as a signal to the audience, to subtly go “hey, I know we don’t trust Qifrey right now, he’s being shady, but we can always trust him to protect the physical wellbeing of his kids. Remember that.” Idk man maybe I’m getting too attached to a teeny detail but aaaaaaghhhh that’s her dad.
Always RB: because there is never enough love. And fanfic love is some of the purest.
I found this piece of bark on the beach that looks like a manatee and I decided to keep it and named him manny
He now has a humble enclosure
I know so many things are bad in society right now. Aside from global warming, we are collectively better off than any human generation in m
Hope for a better future is vital right now. Humans have made a better world before, and we can do it again.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
alright I've got to do some quick math to explain attitudes towards AI to my boss.
we're looking to create an AI policy, and when we were talking about this, my boss (older millennial) was genuinely shocked to hear that younger people do not (seem) to view AI positively (a la the recent commencement speakers being booed)
please rb for larger sample size!
Question 1/3
What is your age, and do you feel AI is a net positive or net negative in our lives today?
under 18, AI is a net positive
under 18, AI is a net negative
18-29, AI is a net positive
18-29, AI is a net negative
30-45, AI is a net positive
30-45, AI is a net negative
46-60, AI is a net positive
46-60, AI is a net negative
over 60, AI is a net postive
over 60, AI is a net negative
Question 2/3
How often do you visit or interact with museums/archives (whether in person or online)?
Frequently (multiple times per month)
Often (multiple times per year)
Occasionally (a couple times per year)
Rarely (once every couple of years)
Never :(
Question 3/3
If you saw a museum was using AI in exhibits, marketing, research, etc., would you be more or less inclined to visit that museum?
under 18, more inclined
under 18, less inclined
18-29, more inclined
18-29, less inclined
30-45, more inclined
30-45, less inclined
46-60, more inclined
46-60, less inclined
over 60, more inclined
over 60, less inclined
Thank you for helping with this data collection. Please rb for as big a sample as possible!
🫶
Think it would do more people some good to understand that they are victims of bigotry because society is bigoted and not necessarily "because" they are the thing people are bigoted towards. Their victimhood is a portion of a larger animal that is not shy about "collateral damage", because the dissent from kyriarchy is always threatening to supremacist structures.
Straight people are absolutely victims of homophobia. Girls too close friends with other girls. When a woman turns down a men and gets called a slur. Men doing anything perceived to be feminine. Years ago a cop tortured and killed his small child because he said the boy was gay. We will never know if that kid turned out to be gay because he wasn't killed for "being gay" but because his father's violent homophobia had him on the hunt for "signs" his child was queer.
Cis people are constantly victims of transphobia. Cis people get transvestigated, gender nonconforming people are attacked in bathrooms, people who "look" or "seem" trans are followed by cops and attacked by security guards. Anyone presenting in a way that doesn't align with the most rigid ideas of male and female are potential deviants who need punished.
White people are absolutely not victims of "reverse racism", but are still not necessarily "exempt" from being victimized by racism and antiblackness. The bar has shifted, and now more groups of white people enjoy being accepted into white supremacy who hadn't been previously--or were conditionally-- for example: Italians, Irish, and Jewish people. The entire concept of "race traitors" is a study on white people being brutalized by anti-Black racism. Racists hate Black folks so severely that white allies and partners are sometimes attacked and killed for it.
None of these people are the main targets of these bigotries, but their privileges are conditional still. Nonconformity and association with the "other" can get those privileges revoked.
But what we need to understand and understand well is that their victimhood in these scenarios is crucially not accidental. It is always a punishment for stepping out of line, either by potentially being the feared/hated category, or for "taking the side" of the feared/hated category. This is always intentional, and framing what happened to them as catching strays or that they aren't even really victims because they aren't the thing that they were hurt/killed over is extremely misguided and dangerous.
Defining ourselves by the violence done to us supports the idea that to exist as we are means to suffer. That a world where we can be ourselves without pain for being ourselves is impossible. It traps us in a cycle of hopelessness. And when we define ourselves by what is done to us, then those who experience what we do must be infringing somehow, because they ARENT us, so they cannot be victims like us. It cheapens their suffering, especially those harmed for allying with us because if to be one of us is such a doomed reality, what does that make someone who chooses to stand with us?
And it also cheapens our identities. It makes our identities and harm synonymous, creating a loop where violence is inevitable and a lack of violence is a lie. Anyone who isn't us is dangerous, and anyone who is us is only ever a victim like us.
It creates insular community that is just as capable of harm as the outsiders, and it deprives us of loving community who actually do know a bit about what it's like to be us, even if they aren't exactly like us.
We are not what has been done to us.
Hyper-individualist cultures go, “Your emotions are your personal responsibility. Don’t burden others. Regulate privately. Maintain functionality. If you’re upset, process it offstage so the machine keeps moving.” Meanwhile certain collectivist or harmony-focused frameworks go, “Your emotions disrupt group cohesion. Don’t create discomfort. Don’t impose disharmony. Transcend or contain your reactions for the sake of the whole.”
Different mythology, same trembling fear that one person saying “actually, I feel terrible” will cause civilization to peel apart like wet drywall.
The less-than-helpful therapy I had as a teenager was a combination of both. The only emotion I was truly allowed was Vaguely Pleasant, or I was treated like an embarrassment to myself and others.
No one, especially an autistic teenager, deserves that.
As pride month approaches it’s time to air my hottest and least relevant take: a lot of pride flags have been designed by people who have absolutely no grasp of what makes certain colours work together
Autism screeners always seem to ask if you dominate conversations… but they seldom seem to ask if you’re constantly spoken over or flat-out ignored because you fit so poorly into conversational rhythms.
The latter is my reality, to an infuriating extent.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
ruby bridges is younger than our sitting president btw
On the Embrace Autism RAADS controversy (and why we’re focusing on the wrong thing):
There’s a controversy over on instagram about a provider giving instructions on how to increase one’s score on the RAADS-R, but no one is talking about a bigger problem:
That the RAADS-R kind of sucks.
It’s 18 years old. The thing is so dated that if it were human, it would be old enough to vote. We have a ton of research since then.
Not to mention the horrendous questions about sympathy and whether you enjoy being with your friends. They show an archaic understanding of autistic people’s ability to care and connect.
The AQ deserves more scrutiny too. It’s 25 years old; I’m in my 30s, and I was in 4th grade when that thing was published! And few people seem aware that its creator built his career on the sexist “extreme male brain theory”. The screener reflects both his sexism and his belief that autistic people are unlikely to be creative or appreciate storytelling.
Honestly? I don’t care all that much whether someone is giving tips on how to take the RAADS.
I do care that in 2026, we’re still forced to rely on biased screeners from my pre-DSM-5, pre-double-empathy-problem childhood. We deserve tools that aren’t fossils (and the CATI looks pretty promising).
'wAAyfarer - The total youth travel experience'
American Airlines travel poster (c. 1970).

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Hey, as someone studying to be a librarian and working in two libraries, I’m telling you to read kid’s books as an adult. Read picture books, graphic novels, and early reader’s books.
So many adults abandon reading as a hobby/coping mechanism because they feel they can only read adult books. And that takes a lot of time and effort a lot of us don’t have.
You don’t have to get large chapter books with long, complex plots that take hours to days to read to enjoy reading. You’re allowed to enjoy short, simple stories.
Reading has literally no rules. Books don’t discriminate. Read whatever you enjoy, even if that includes children’s books.
Also support your local library please!!!
You can have any animal for a pet. Any complications such as “keeping the animal healthy and happy” and “the time and effort it would take to keep happy and healthy pet” and “keeping yourself uneaten” and “the pet I want is kind of extinct” have all been solved perfectly. You don’t have to think of that.
What is your pet?
#manatee #a manatee named sunshine