2017ā²s Word of the Year: Feminism
I just learned that the most searched word on Marriam-Websterās website in 2017 was, āFeminism,ā which is defined as, āThe theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexesā and I have a lot of smart, important points to make about this topic, but instead Iām super tempted address the mind-blowingly unremarkable concept thatās been popping up all year. So, after watching passively as the same dense argument has been passed around, lifted into the air like a trophy, and celebrated by an audience all surrounding me, Iāve finally given in to dignifying this ignorance with a response. Ā
Why do I always find myself listening to the chirpings-on about how America ādoesnāt need feminismā because there are women in other countries who āhave it worseā? Does this argument suggest that since increased oppression is causing other countries to miss out on the talents of its citizens (to say the least), more so than here, that it takes some sort of audacity for an American to demand complete equality of the sexes? Does this reasoning also suggest that an American citizenās desire to reap the full benefits of any particular right should be negated by a direr need for that right in other parts of the world?
With that being said, does this mean that since forced child marriage is far more common in India than in the US, that itās wrong for countries like ours to advocate for marriage equality, because at least we have the option of choosing who and when we marry?
Does it mean that since Russian reporters lack the free press that would allow them to properly inform their audiences, and have been known to wind up dead after opposing the views of the Kremlin, that Americans should not speak out against faulty news stories, biased media coverage, or net neutrality because, hey, at least reporters arenāt risking their lives every day?
Does it mean that since the North Korean government dictates where its citizens will live and work, that American citizens who are being denied reasonable accommodation or fair compensation by their employer, should pipe down about workersā rights laws, because at least they got to choose their jobs in the first place?
I think one of the most frustrating aspects of this narrative are the threads of patriotism and selflessness manipulatively woven into the presentation of its position, when those two values could not be further from its foundation. Iāve scrolled through countless threads, of both familiar and unfamiliar names, condemning feminist causes, and implying that supporters of the feminist movement in this country are ungrateful for their freedoms and careless about the circumstances of women around the world, but the truth is more clearly revealed through the actions of those on both sides.
Feminists who are willing to point out examples of rape culture, sexism in the work place, the need for intersectional feminism, are also the ones willing to research how to shop ethically in order to avoid supporting sweatshops and other immoral systems around the world. Theyāre the ones whoāve never stepped foot in Primark, even though theyāre broke, who picked out their New Yearās Eve dress at a thrift shop, and who volunteer sometimes after work, because they want so badly to use their privilege and small bit of power to help affect progress for everyone, regardless of nationality.
Those of us who will openly and passionately acknowledge the need for feminism in the US, also acknowledge the precious liberties we assume as citizens of this country, so we come together and speak up when we can, because we believe that America can help lead the rest. I will never understand how a group of people can point their finger at the feminist movement in disapproval, by declaring that itās efforts are inconsiderate to the rest of the world, while also chanting, āAmerica Firstā for the whole world to hear.














