⋆˚꩜｡⋆Cass⋆｡꩜˚⋆

Hi I'm Cass , I'm 16 (she/her)

Feel free to ask anything I love answering question, whether is about me or fandoms I'm in (especially fandoms I love and be prepared because I will go into full detail)

Current fandoms:

Dan and Phil, life series, FNAF, Naruto, the summer Hikaru died, death note, jjk, I'm in love with the villainess, the scream franchise, marvel

Music I love:

Mcfly, busted, mcbusted, one direction (plus solos) , MCR, 5SOS, Alex warren, Taylor swift etc

Likes:

Does Stu's ending annoy anyone else or is this just a me issue?

Throughout the first scream film they are constantly referring to the rules of horror with Randy's whole character being there to explain them. Like obviously they have the three main rules which all get broken before the main stabbings take place in Stu's house but there are ones like to kill a ghost face you have to shoot them in the head to kill them. This is more unspoken in the first scream film but carries on throughout the whole franchise that this is how you kill a ghost face. I can't remember randys exact words but when billy had been stabbed with the umbrella he says something about double checking and that that was when the killer comes back for a finale attempt or something like that.

They follower none of these rules for stu. He "died" when the etv fell on his head which would probably kill a normal person but like I said, in the franchise to kill a ghost face you have to shoot it in the head so why is stu dead? I don't belive he is.

Even Matthew Lillard did a cameo in the background of scream 2 where you could clearly see his face. I don't think they would risk fans recognising him unless there was a reason he was there. It feels like they set up this whole arc ready for stu to cocke back but instead they replace him with AI even though scream 7 would have made a perfect comeback film to re introduce his character.