rehtegot gnimoc lla sti haey ho

idgaf follow ur laws or break them or whatever. i genuinely dont care where ur from. all im saying is that fiction (no matter how disgusting or disturbing u find it to be) shouldnt be censored + portraying bad things in fiction doesnt automatically mean u support those bad things. u can disagree and seethe all day but ur not changing my mind. america is shit but at least i can be a cringe freak and piss off pro-censorship ppl like u!!!!

First off, No, you don't get to generalize a group of people who are literally AGAINST abuse as abusers. Antishippers literally try as hard as they can to PREVENT abuse.

Second, Being "anti harassment" DOES make you more capable of abuse because you normalize the fucked up shit people ship. I wouldn't have had fantasies of my parents sexually abusing me if I hadn't become a proshipper, because that introduced me to things I shouldn'tve known about.

Third, most if not all proshippers are either current abusers if not future abusers. I know this because I almost went down that path myself.

antishippers protect fictional kids more than they protect real ones dawg LMAOOO. the whole point is that theyre pro-censorship for "problematic fiction". what abt that tells u that theyre anti-abuse???

And wow! A whole list of people doing bad things and acting like that's the entirety of the community! That certainly hasn't been used against certain groups before!

Also we're "pro censorship" for problematic fiction BECAUSE we're anti abuse. We know that those kinds of fictions can affect the way a person views the world in one way or another and that they're the perfect material for grooming kids. And don't go "B-But anything can be used as grooming material!" because you KNOW that fucked up shit has a much higher prevalence of being used to hurt children.

proshippers dont harass ppl for their fictional interests usually--theres always bad apples. antishippers made a whole community of doing exactly that (harassing ppl for liking dark fiction). im not too sympathetic to antis getting a taste of their own medicine (though i am against suibaiting and doxxing and all that illegal shit obv). also ur crying abt harassment while actively harassing others soooooo. shrug.

wow it looks like calling out and compiling a list of predators is now [insert minority here]-phobic!!!! u dont wanna go there w me bc im a part of the most stigmatized group in the world. its so stigmatized theres barely any research on us bc whenever researchers try to conduct studies they get a huge amount of backlash from the public for even trying to "humanize" us. i think ud tell me to kms if i told u what i am. :3

anywho censorship in general isnt good. learn some damn history. anything CAN be used to groom minors. lets ban puppies and candy and social media too while we are at it. we can never be too careful. (/sarc) i want some evidence for that problematic fiction is prevalent in grooming bc i looked into it and couldnt find anything to support that. try again.

its not ur fault for being groomed but u need to understand that a horrible individual is at fault for introducing u to that material when u werent ready for it--it wasnt the entire community. i had to unlearn my generalized hatred for antishippers bc i thought the same way u did. i wish u luck in establishing a healthy relationship w fiction in general and w ur healing.

First off, No, you don't get to generalize a group of people who are literally AGAINST abuse as abusers. Antishippers literally try as hard as they can to PREVENT abuse.

Second, Being "anti harassment" DOES make you more capable of abuse because you normalize the fucked up shit people ship. I wouldn't have had fantasies of my parents sexually abusing me if I hadn't become a proshipper, because that introduced me to things I shouldn'tve known about.

Third, most if not all proshippers are either current abusers if not future abusers. I know this because I almost went down that path myself.

antishippers protect fictional kids more than they protect real ones dawg LMAOOO. the whole point is that theyre pro-censorship for "problematic fiction". what abt that tells u that theyre anti-abuse???