Try leading with any argument other than backwards superstitions, and rebutting with something other than racism.
sherpas used to be treated like expedition partners...and now theyāre treated like they are lowly disposable service workers
Two things can be true at once. As technology improved, and information spread, the value of the sherpas' knowledge decreased.
that knew the land better than you because they were raised on it
Weird how when it comes to following American customs and practices in America, this argument means the opposite, that the locals have an unfair advantage and should be more accommodating to, and understanding of, newcomers
setting up heated tents or spas for wealthy hikers who have no business on the mountain
Whyever not? Who says? What is the difference between people who believe this about a mountain in a country that makes a significant amount from tourism, and people who believe other sorts of foreigners have no business in their land?
like they are collecting your nasty trash off
Oh, is littering a disqualification for foreigners visiting? This is going to be exciting news for nativist movements throughout the developed world...
one of the holiest and most sacred mountains in the world like do yāall understand that we see sagarmatha or mount everest as a living deity on earth
Literally your problem, no one else's. I know people who wince, experiencing real psychological pain, when others use the word "Jesus" as an epithet. I know people who refuse to spell the word God when writing. It's their issue, no one else's.
while the rest of the world sees her as a conquest
Yep.
i grew up in oriental orthodox christianity and now practice buddhism, but tell me again what i donāt know.
Get bent. This is explicitly in reference to your racist assumptions and statement.
you donāt have to believe in āmyā gods to respect the deep and cultural ties nepalese people have for
You were the one who picked the grounds for the discussion. You gave that as the reason, and it was the only one you gave.
desire behind wanting to protect one of the most historic and coolest natural sites of the world
Everest is cool because of its height. When someone starts knocking of bits of the tip to make it shorter, then we can talk about protecting it. It's also not all that historic, since it wasn't the site of much activity until rather late in history, and that mostly recreational.
even if it comes from a spiritual practice you donāt believe in.
Well, when Christians have spend half their time in political discourse parsing out their non-religious reasons for supporting any policy, because actually having religion as a motivation is considered disqualifying, you're not going to get a culture that is very sympathetic to your religious motivations.
ecological destruction and death of indigenous people for profit isnāt cool just because you hate religion.
Assuming your understanding of writing is as lacking as your grasp of capitalization, this was not the subject of the OP. Whatever you meant, you complained about the decline in dignity of a group whose profession has become adulterated by time and the rising prosperity of the rest of the world. No rational analysis would ascertain an ecological argument in that post, as your sole allusion was in the context of it being beneath the dignity of the sherpas.
What this looks like is a lot of exceptionalist whining, and when you got called out for it, attempting to shift the ground to hide behind a broader moralistic position.
We must respect the other fellowās religion, but only in the sense and to the extent that we respect his theory that his wife is beautiful and his children smart.
- H. L. Mencken