The Problem with Child Protective Services
Over the last five years, I have become increasingly disillusioned with Child Protective Services. I have seen many children left in extremely dangerous situations and even more children removed from families that did not need to be removed from those families. I will go on in this blog to state some of my observations of the problems with Child Protective Services and in subsequent blogs I intend to address many of these areas specifically, giving examples and further explanations. It appears that despite the stated goals of Child Protective Services, the actions of Child Protective Services indicate that they have lost much of the compassion they profess for the families they are assigned to help. Their actions often reveal a bureaucracy designed to cover their tracks as opposed to serving the public interest in the protection of children and maintaining family integrity. Let me be clear what my problem with Child Protective Services is: it’s not just their compassion fatigue, but rather it is my dissatisfaction with bureaucracy, my fear of big government, and outrage at the escalating costs. It’s more than concern regarding the number of families disrupted and destroyed or sorrow at the human and financial cost of intervention in normally sacred and private family matters. It goes beyond disillusionment at the highly public failures to rebuild families and protect children. The core problem with Child Protective Services is the manipulation of public consent and the consent of the families that Child Protective Services is supposed to be serving. I, along with many members of the public, am disillusioned with the way in which Child Protective Services and politicians have used moral and humanitarian arguments regarding child safety to extract public support and family support for emergency interventions in family matters. After garnering that support, they then conduct those interventions in ways that ultimately displayed Child Protective Services’ true lack of commitment to those principles. Most people do not realize it, but Child Protective Services routinely interviews children in schools without any parental consent or even knowledge that the interview is happening. Often, these interviews are the result of a vague and unfounded report of child abuse or neglect. It is not unusual for Child Protective Services to show up at a family’s doorstep and demand a drug test. If someone asserts there is no need for a drug test, it is not uncommon for the caseworker to say, “If you refuse, we will just get a court order.” This drug test is more than just a theoretical invasion of someone’s privacy: potentially innocent people are then asked to open their mouths so a government agent can put something inside their mouth and “swab” the inside of their cheek. Child Protective Services must be reformed. This reform begins with an increased respect for the integrity of family and the rights of individuals. Meanwhile, if you have any interaction with Child Protective Services and wonder if you need a lawyer, let me help you out: yes, you need one.
Beau
www.sinclairlawtyler.com











