I kind of liked Nolanās adaptation of The Odyssey, sue me.
Itās an adaptation, not a line-for-line retelling, heās supposed to interpret it through his own perspective and bring his own ideas to the table, otherwise why do the movie at all?
I definitely didnāt like absolutely everything about it, and think that every movie should be critiqued in good faith. But itās not in good faith to say a whole movie is garbage because it doesnāt faithfully depict the entire source material exactly as written. The poem still exists: you can always read it. If you read it in translation, thatās an adaptation too.
Some things I thought were interesting and worthy of discussion (not that I endorse these as universally good choices, I just think they are interesting choices):
- focusing on the violence of the Trojan War, and the resulting guilt of the conquering hero. Itās been a while since I read The Odyssey, but I think this is a new take on the material? My memory of the poem is that whoever wins the war is āright,ā and the gods take their sides to effect that result. So whoever wins in battle is favored by the gods. It was really interesting for the hero of the final battle of the Trojan War, Odysseus, by that reading the most favored of the gods, to then become so unfavored on his journey home as he struggles with the violence that he himself caused and participated in. This isnāt a particularly classical philosophy but is more modern, but I think itās really interesting. Itās perhaps why he feels, at the end of the movie, he has created a world that he has no right to live in and self-exiles. Or maybe he punishes himself so that the gods donāt?
- The idea of poor leadership and its consequences. Odysseus leads his men to ruin and death, and seemingly canāt avoid it (due to prophecy). I think this is why the scene with the bag of wind from Aeolus is cut- if the men open it, then they are not taken off course by Odysseusās decision. In Nolanās movie, it is his very first decision NOT to take established trade routes home that dooms his crew. He is always a little too clever for his own good. An interesting follow-up conversation is the idea that Antinous āleadsā the suitors in any way. I donāt think this was fully developed in the movie, but it seems like it was suggested as he was a rival to Odysseus, and his death caused the remaining suitors to stop fighting and declare loyalty to Odysseus. Itās a reminder that actually, Antinousās men were always Odysseusās men at the end of the day, and even Antinous was one of Odysseusās people too. They all just forgot who their leader was for a while until order was re-established through the use of extreme violence. What does it mean that the extreme violence in Troy resulted in the guilt that haunts Odysseus for 10 years, but similar violence in Ithaca re-secures his familyās rule?
- Nolan left out several instances of Odysseus behaving like a regular Greek hero, probably to make him more palatable and heroic to modern audiences. For example: he does not sleep with Circe, and he does not kill the slave girls in Ithaca who had slept with the suitors. What does this say about how ancient audiences viewed their heroes, and how modern ones expect them to behave? Modern audiences typically hate it when heroes cheat on their wives- fair enough. But how are we meant to read the fact that the only punitive action taken against a slave girl collaborator was doled out by Queen Penelope- is it more acceptable because the betrayal was against her personally, or because these actions are between two women?
- Why did Nolan remove the arc of Calypso sexually assaulting Odysseus while she held him captive for many years? The poem tells us that he slept with her unwilling, and the movie even shows that he is in a kind of disoriented brainwashed state- as far as it is willing to go. He is clearly unable to consent to anything sexual, but the movie refuses to say if anything happened. Why stop there? Are modern audiences still not ready to accept male heroes that have been victimized in this way? (This is not a question asked in earnest- I know the answer.)
These are just some initial questions that I think this adaptation of The Odyssey is very clearly engaging with or could be used to explore. I saw the movie 4 days ago and have been thinking about it ever since. It isnāt the best movie Iāve ever seen, but it has engaged with the source material in an interesting way and thatās really all I wanted out of the experience.