Pansexual Aspie

(Also panphobes stop using the bisexual manifesto as evidence against pan people just bc of overlap, IT LEGIT SAYS THE LABEL CAN BE INADEQUATE TO SOME)

Still one common misconception I see is that pan is regardless of gender and bi isn't . . . Which is wholly inaccurate and also biphobic. Please do ur reasearch y'all!!! Bi means attraction to two or more genders, pan means attraction to all genders, BOTH ARE VALID. Nothing more, nothing less.

Queer SFF books by POC authors. 

Bi is attraction to one or more genders and bi people can have a preference in gender

Pan is attraction to ALL genders and identities.

“We’re attracted to ALL genders, we dont care about gender” homophobic and biphobic

“We include trans people!” HEAVILY transphobic

“We’re attracted to ALL genders, we don’t care about gender” I really don’t see the connection to bi and homophobia? Were just saying we don’t care about what gender our partner identifies as!

I don’t agree with the “we include trans people” at all and it’s stupid, I agree and therefore it’s very rare to find a pansexual person who actually says that my dude.

2. Bi does not mean “Two or more”. Bi has always meant all. You can ask every bi person on this fucking hellsite and they well tell you that. The issue with you pannies is that 90% of you got the wrong definition of what bisexuality actually is, because if you knew youd realise how fucking unnecessary and biphobic your label is.

3. You cant claim to not be biphobic and then go “Oh so Im attracted to all, yknow like a bisexual but Id rather label myself with the more woke version.”

4. There is no reason to prefer the label pan over bi, both literally have the same definition. The only difference is that pan is p fucking transphobic with their “hearts not parts ;PP” and “Id date trans ppl too!!1″ bullshit. Literally stop trying to be woke yall are just bi people with internalized biphobia and a need to be a lil extra QuIrKy and woke than the rest.

1- I can for a fact assure that there are people that agree with me that pan people don’t have preferences

2- Bi means 2, that’s literally its definition, if I was an asshole I’d say “Bi is only attraction to male and female” but I don’t say that BECAUSE ITS NOT TRUE

3- I DO NOT CARE WHAT YOU LABEL YOURSELF AS I identify more with the label Pansexual, some people prefer Bisexual, that’s fine.

4-for once I agree with you! I despise the “hearts not parts” and “I’d date trans people” because trans people are men and women too and I don’t think everyone else only thinks about what people have in their pants.

5- and that’s just stupid, I’m not attracted to animals, children, objects or anything else. This point is so stupid I don’t even know how to explain how stupid it is. All as in all genders, not all things.

The most common definitions of pansexuality are:

1. “Attraction to men, women and trans people”

2. “Attraction to men, women and NB people”

3. “Attraction to all genders”

4. “Attraction regardless of gender”

5. “Attraction to people’s personalities”

First definition: transphobic as shit, full stop. Trans people are either men or women, acting as if they are a third gender that only pansexuals can be attracted to is gross. 

Second definition: biphobic and nonsensical. Its biphobic because bisexuality never, ever excluded nonbinary people and it takes two seconds to look at bi history to understand that.

There’s also the fact that everyone can be attracted to nonbinary people. Yes, even straights. Wanna know why?

Because nonbinary people don’t have a set of physical characteristics that immediately tells you that they’re nonbinary. They look exactly like any other binary man or woman. Yes, some of them may be androgynous, but there are plenty of non androgynous nonbinary people and plenty of androgynous binary people. 

So if they look exactly like men and women, how am I supposed to not feel any attraction to them? How am I supposed to exclude from my attraction a whole group of people that look wildly different from one another? Hell, how am I supposed to even recognize a nonbinary person without them telling me?

It just doesn’t work like that. Liam Hemsworth is not suddenly pansexual because he dated Miley Cyrus who is nonbinary but looks exactly like a woman.

Third definition: “Attraction to all genders” that is literally included in the definition of bisexuality. Historically, bisexuality always rejected the gender binary and always included all genders.

Fourth definition: “Attraction regardless of genders” thats not how it works. By definition, sexual orientation is WHAT GENDERS you’re attracted to, not HOW you are attracted to those genders. Bisexuals and pansexuals are attracted to the exact same genders and many bisexuals don’t take gender in consideration when looking for a partner. Saying that the difference between bisexuals and pansexuals is that for bisexuals gender needs to play a relevant role is just plain false, denies the experiences of many bisexuals and paints us as gender obsessed.

Fifth definition: “Attraction to someone’s personality” now this is just sapiosexual 2.0. Saying that the defining experience of your sexuality is being attracted to personalities implies that all other sexualities aren’t. Everyone feels attraction to personalities, its not just a pansexual thing. Having a completely separate label for something that everyone experiences is just absurd. And again, its not how sexual orientation works.

So, unless you redefine bisexuality (biphobia) or you misunderstand what a sexual orientation is (just plain old ignorance), bisexuality and pansexuality are the exact same thing.

So why is pansexuality problematic and toxic?

1. Because it never letf behind its roots. Pansexuality was born because of bisexual stereotypes (that we exclude trans/nonbinary people, that we are attracted to parts and not hearts, that we are gender obsessed freaks) and its still heavily associated to the “hearts not parts” biphobic and transphobic bullshit. Like, I literally have a ton of screenshot of people saying that in 2019. Not 2009, 2019. The cultural impact that pansexuality had helped to spread a ton of stereotypes and misinformation about bisexuality. 

2. Because of the biphobia of the pansexual community. Like I said above, pansexuals still spread stereotypes about bisexuality to defend pansexuality, such as “bi means two, pan means all”. If people call out biphobia, they get called bigots, panphobes (thats exactly why i semi ironically have “panphobic queen” in my bio) or TERFs.

3. Because the rethoric “its fine to be uncomfortable with bisexuality, use this other label that was born out of biphobia and still hasn’t escaped its roots” is extremely problematic.

In a society where LGBT people are seen as dirty, sinful, immoral and deviants and that makes sure to say that stuff loud and clear its normal that some LGBT people internalize that shit.

The reaction to “hey, calling myself gay makes me uncomfortable” shouldn’t be “valid, lets make up a new word that means the same but in a ~woke~ way”, it should be “lets dismantle and actively fight the system that makes people uncomfortable with those words”. And its even worse for bisexuality, cause even in our community is often stigmatized and stereotyped (and while LGT people don’t have the power to oppress us, the biphobia in our community does harm us quite a lot).

Of course people are gonna be uncomfortable with bisexuality. That label has a huge baggage and a huge history of discrimination tied to it. Of course people would rather choose to use with a label born to be all inclusive and not with the “transphobic” and “enbyphobic” one. However, that mindset is incredibly damaging to bisexuals and the bisexual community.

Not acknowledging WHY the bisexual label makes you uncomfortable and opting out of the dismantling process of all those things that makes it uncomfortable with a convenient new label does more harm than good to bisexuals.

Actually, it reinforces that! I’ve lost count of how many times i’ve seen posts by pansexuals that really boiled down to “WE are attracted to someone’s soul and personality and we don’t care about gender unlike those bisexuals, who always care about your gender”.

Hell, just a couple of days ago i’ve seen an article by a pansexual person literally saying “i experience attraction in a different way than most people, i don’t look at someone wondering what their genitals look like or what it would be like to fuck them” (an almost word per word quote) as if everyone but pansexuals are creeps who wonder about strangers’ genitals.

Also, pansexuals are the very last ones that should say “let people identify how they wish!” cause all they’ve done is forcedly redefining bisexuality in order to validate pansexuality. Ever wondered why the definition of pansexuality changes every other day? Because you keep inventing a new one every time bisexuals point out that the previous is biphobic. You keep twisting the definition of bisexuality and ignoring our history and our voices to accomodate your made up biphobic label. 

You like to scream “let us identify how we want” every time we bring up the very valid issues that we have with your label and maybe you don’t realize that, but its just another way to silence us when we try to speak up.

The only thing we’ve been asking you is to not shit all over out history and activism, to listen to us when we bring up our issues and to have a bit of critical thought about your label and community. You would think its the bare minimum but the fact that we need to have this conversation every two weeks proves that you refuse to do that.

I never meant to be harmful, I never meant to hurt anyone or exclude anyone, my original post was meant to spread positivity.

Thank you people who replied to this, for completely destroying my mental health to feel better about yourselves

But genuine thank you to the people who dmmed me after seeing this post, telling me that they were here for me, I appreciate you so much.

I AM NOT BIPHOBIC ask literally anyone who knows me ANYONE, I dare you.

You say that I blame logic, when everyone aren’t even responding to me, you’re the only who responded to me asking people to stop.

Do you really think it’s worth upsetting someone to the point of tears just because you think I hate your sexuality? I don’t hate bi people or trans people or anyone for that matter!

if calm(emphasis on calm) responses and logical statements make you have sensory overload, then maybe you need to sit back and reflect after taking a moment away from your blog. it could be a sign of severely bottled stress and a need for therapy and/or medication, and quarantine hasn't helped my same reactions to similar things so I'm trying to understand!

...fortunately, MOST of the people above are using the reclaimed versions of pansexuality, and not the Freudian version, which is bisexuality with z//philia and p///philia added in, and we can all agree this is gross and not a reflection of pan people whatsoever

I appreciate that you try to be civil in this but it’s hard for me to be when I have gotten so much hate on a post that was meant to be positive.

I’m probably gonna delete this entire blog despite being seen as a coward for it.

Bi is attraction to one or more genders and bi people can have a preference in gender

Pan is attraction to ALL genders and identities.

“We’re attracted to ALL genders, we dont care about gender” homophobic and biphobic

“We include trans people!” HEAVILY transphobic

“We’re attracted to ALL genders, we don’t care about gender” I really don’t see the connection to bi and homophobia? Were just saying we don’t care about what gender our partner identifies as!

I don’t agree with the “we include trans people” at all and it’s stupid, I agree and therefore it’s very rare to find a pansexual person who actually says that my dude.

2. Bi does not mean “Two or more”. Bi has always meant all. You can ask every bi person on this fucking hellsite and they well tell you that. The issue with you pannies is that 90% of you got the wrong definition of what bisexuality actually is, because if you knew youd realise how fucking unnecessary and biphobic your label is.

3. You cant claim to not be biphobic and then go “Oh so Im attracted to all, yknow like a bisexual but Id rather label myself with the more woke version.”

4. There is no reason to prefer the label pan over bi, both literally have the same definition. The only difference is that pan is p fucking transphobic with their “hearts not parts ;PP” and “Id date trans ppl too!!1″ bullshit. Literally stop trying to be woke yall are just bi people with internalized biphobia and a need to be a lil extra QuIrKy and woke than the rest.

1- I can for a fact assure that there are people that agree with me that pan people don’t have preferences

2- Bi means 2, that’s literally its definition, if I was an asshole I’d say “Bi is only attraction to male and female” but I don’t say that BECAUSE ITS NOT TRUE

3- I DO NOT CARE WHAT YOU LABEL YOURSELF AS I identify more with the label Pansexual, some people prefer Bisexual, that’s fine.

4-for once I agree with you! I despise the “hearts not parts” and “I’d date trans people” because trans people are men and women too and I don’t think everyone else only thinks about what people have in their pants.

5- and that’s just stupid, I’m not attracted to animals, children, objects or anything else. This point is so stupid I don’t even know how to explain how stupid it is. All as in all genders, not all things.

The most common definitions of pansexuality are:

1. “Attraction to men, women and trans people”

2. “Attraction to men, women and NB people”

3. “Attraction to all genders”

4. “Attraction regardless of gender”

5. “Attraction to people’s personalities”

First definition: transphobic as shit, full stop. Trans people are either men or women, acting as if they are a third gender that only pansexuals can be attracted to is gross. 

Second definition: biphobic and nonsensical. Its biphobic because bisexuality never, ever excluded nonbinary people and it takes two seconds to look at bi history to understand that.

There’s also the fact that everyone can be attracted to nonbinary people. Yes, even straights. Wanna know why?

Because nonbinary people don’t have a set of physical characteristics that immediately tells you that they’re nonbinary. They look exactly like any other binary man or woman. Yes, some of them may be androgynous, but there are plenty of non androgynous nonbinary people and plenty of androgynous binary people. 

So if they look exactly like men and women, how am I supposed to not feel any attraction to them? How am I supposed to exclude from my attraction a whole group of people that look wildly different from one another? Hell, how am I supposed to even recognize a nonbinary person without them telling me?

It just doesn’t work like that. Liam Hemsworth is not suddenly pansexual because he dated Miley Cyrus who is nonbinary but looks exactly like a woman.

Third definition: “Attraction to all genders” that is literally included in the definition of bisexuality. Historically, bisexuality always rejected the gender binary and always included all genders.

Fourth definition: “Attraction regardless of genders” thats not how it works. By definition, sexual orientation is WHAT GENDERS you’re attracted to, not HOW you are attracted to those genders. Bisexuals and pansexuals are attracted to the exact same genders and many bisexuals don’t take gender in consideration when looking for a partner. Saying that the difference between bisexuals and pansexuals is that for bisexuals gender needs to play a relevant role is just plain false, denies the experiences of many bisexuals and paints us as gender obsessed.

Fifth definition: “Attraction to someone’s personality” now this is just sapiosexual 2.0. Saying that the defining experience of your sexuality is being attracted to personalities implies that all other sexualities aren’t. Everyone feels attraction to personalities, its not just a pansexual thing. Having a completely separate label for something that everyone experiences is just absurd. And again, its not how sexual orientation works.

So, unless you redefine bisexuality (biphobia) or you misunderstand what a sexual orientation is (just plain old ignorance), bisexuality and pansexuality are the exact same thing.

So why is pansexuality problematic and toxic?

1. Because it never letf behind its roots. Pansexuality was born because of bisexual stereotypes (that we exclude trans/nonbinary people, that we are attracted to parts and not hearts, that we are gender obsessed freaks) and its still heavily associated to the “hearts not parts” biphobic and transphobic bullshit. Like, I literally have a ton of screenshot of people saying that in 2019. Not 2009, 2019. The cultural impact that pansexuality had helped to spread a ton of stereotypes and misinformation about bisexuality. 

2. Because of the biphobia of the pansexual community. Like I said above, pansexuals still spread stereotypes about bisexuality to defend pansexuality, such as “bi means two, pan means all”. If people call out biphobia, they get called bigots, panphobes (thats exactly why i semi ironically have “panphobic queen” in my bio) or TERFs.

3. Because the rethoric “its fine to be uncomfortable with bisexuality, use this other label that was born out of biphobia and still hasn’t escaped its roots” is extremely problematic.

In a society where LGBT people are seen as dirty, sinful, immoral and deviants and that makes sure to say that stuff loud and clear its normal that some LGBT people internalize that shit.

The reaction to “hey, calling myself gay makes me uncomfortable” shouldn’t be “valid, lets make up a new word that means the same but in a ~woke~ way”, it should be “lets dismantle and actively fight the system that makes people uncomfortable with those words”. And its even worse for bisexuality, cause even in our community is often stigmatized and stereotyped (and while LGT people don’t have the power to oppress us, the biphobia in our community does harm us quite a lot).

Of course people are gonna be uncomfortable with bisexuality. That label has a huge baggage and a huge history of discrimination tied to it. Of course people would rather choose to use with a label born to be all inclusive and not with the “transphobic” and “enbyphobic” one. However, that mindset is incredibly damaging to bisexuals and the bisexual community.

Not acknowledging WHY the bisexual label makes you uncomfortable and opting out of the dismantling process of all those things that makes it uncomfortable with a convenient new label does more harm than good to bisexuals.

Actually, it reinforces that! I’ve lost count of how many times i’ve seen posts by pansexuals that really boiled down to “WE are attracted to someone’s soul and personality and we don’t care about gender unlike those bisexuals, who always care about your gender”.

Hell, just a couple of days ago i’ve seen an article by a pansexual person literally saying “i experience attraction in a different way than most people, i don’t look at someone wondering what their genitals look like or what it would be like to fuck them” (an almost word per word quote) as if everyone but pansexuals are creeps who wonder about strangers’ genitals.

Also, pansexuals are the very last ones that should say “let people identify how they wish!” cause all they’ve done is forcedly redefining bisexuality in order to validate pansexuality. Ever wondered why the definition of pansexuality changes every other day? Because you keep inventing a new one every time bisexuals point out that the previous is biphobic. You keep twisting the definition of bisexuality and ignoring our history and our voices to accomodate your made up biphobic label. 

You like to scream “let us identify how we want” every time we bring up the very valid issues that we have with your label and maybe you don’t realize that, but its just another way to silence us when we try to speak up.

The only thing we’ve been asking you is to not shit all over out history and activism, to listen to us when we bring up our issues and to have a bit of critical thought about your label and community. You would think its the bare minimum but the fact that we need to have this conversation every two weeks proves that you refuse to do that.

I never meant to be harmful, I never meant to hurt anyone or exclude anyone, my original post was meant to spread positivity.

Thank you people who replied to this, for completely destroying my mental health to feel better about yourselves

But genuine thank you to the people who dmmed me after seeing this post, telling me that they were here for me, I appreciate you so much.

I AM NOT BIPHOBIC ask literally anyone who knows me ANYONE, I dare you.

You say that I blame logic, when everyone aren’t even responding to me, you’re the only who responded to me asking people to stop.

Do you really think it’s worth upsetting someone to the point of tears just because you think I hate your sexuality? I don’t hate bi people or trans people or anyone for that matter!

Story of my life people. You know what’s real ? The struggle.

Bi is attraction to one or more genders and bi people can have a preference in gender

Pan is attraction to ALL genders and identities.

“We’re attracted to ALL genders, we dont care about gender” homophobic and biphobic

“We include trans people!” HEAVILY transphobic

“We’re attracted to ALL genders, we don’t care about gender” I really don’t see the connection to bi and homophobia? Were just saying we don’t care about what gender our partner identifies as!

I don’t agree with the “we include trans people” at all and it’s stupid, I agree and therefore it’s very rare to find a pansexual person who actually says that my dude.

2. Bi does not mean “Two or more”. Bi has always meant all. You can ask every bi person on this fucking hellsite and they well tell you that. The issue with you pannies is that 90% of you got the wrong definition of what bisexuality actually is, because if you knew youd realise how fucking unnecessary and biphobic your label is.

3. You cant claim to not be biphobic and then go “Oh so Im attracted to all, yknow like a bisexual but Id rather label myself with the more woke version.”

4. There is no reason to prefer the label pan over bi, both literally have the same definition. The only difference is that pan is p fucking transphobic with their “hearts not parts ;PP” and “Id date trans ppl too!!1″ bullshit. Literally stop trying to be woke yall are just bi people with internalized biphobia and a need to be a lil extra QuIrKy and woke than the rest.

1- I can for a fact assure that there are people that agree with me that pan people don’t have preferences

2- Bi means 2, that’s literally its definition, if I was an asshole I’d say “Bi is only attraction to male and female” but I don’t say that BECAUSE ITS NOT TRUE

3- I DO NOT CARE WHAT YOU LABEL YOURSELF AS I identify more with the label Pansexual, some people prefer Bisexual, that’s fine.

4-for once I agree with you! I despise the “hearts not parts” and “I’d date trans people” because trans people are men and women too and I don’t think everyone else only thinks about what people have in their pants.

5- and that’s just stupid, I’m not attracted to animals, children, objects or anything else. This point is so stupid I don’t even know how to explain how stupid it is. All as in all genders, not all things.

The most common definitions of pansexuality are:

1. “Attraction to men, women and trans people”

2. “Attraction to men, women and NB people”

3. “Attraction to all genders”

4. “Attraction regardless of gender”

5. “Attraction to people’s personalities”

First definition: transphobic as shit, full stop. Trans people are either men or women, acting as if they are a third gender that only pansexuals can be attracted to is gross. 

Second definition: biphobic and nonsensical. Its biphobic because bisexuality never, ever excluded nonbinary people and it takes two seconds to look at bi history to understand that.

There’s also the fact that everyone can be attracted to nonbinary people. Yes, even straights. Wanna know why?

Because nonbinary people don’t have a set of physical characteristics that immediately tells you that they’re nonbinary. They look exactly like any other binary man or woman. Yes, some of them may be androgynous, but there are plenty of non androgynous nonbinary people and plenty of androgynous binary people. 

So if they look exactly like men and women, how am I supposed to not feel any attraction to them? How am I supposed to exclude from my attraction a whole group of people that look wildly different from one another? Hell, how am I supposed to even recognize a nonbinary person without them telling me?

It just doesn’t work like that. Liam Hemsworth is not suddenly pansexual because he dated Miley Cyrus who is nonbinary but looks exactly like a woman.

Third definition: “Attraction to all genders” that is literally included in the definition of bisexuality. Historically, bisexuality always rejected the gender binary and always included all genders.

Fourth definition: “Attraction regardless of genders” thats not how it works. By definition, sexual orientation is WHAT GENDERS you’re attracted to, not HOW you are attracted to those genders. Bisexuals and pansexuals are attracted to the exact same genders and many bisexuals don’t take gender in consideration when looking for a partner. Saying that the difference between bisexuals and pansexuals is that for bisexuals gender needs to play a relevant role is just plain false, denies the experiences of many bisexuals and paints us as gender obsessed.

Fifth definition: “Attraction to someone’s personality” now this is just sapiosexual 2.0. Saying that the defining experience of your sexuality is being attracted to personalities implies that all other sexualities aren’t. Everyone feels attraction to personalities, its not just a pansexual thing. Having a completely separate label for something that everyone experiences is just absurd. And again, its not how sexual orientation works.

So, unless you redefine bisexuality (biphobia) or you misunderstand what a sexual orientation is (just plain old ignorance), bisexuality and pansexuality are the exact same thing.

So why is pansexuality problematic and toxic?

1. Because it never letf behind its roots. Pansexuality was born because of bisexual stereotypes (that we exclude trans/nonbinary people, that we are attracted to parts and not hearts, that we are gender obsessed freaks) and its still heavily associated to the “hearts not parts” biphobic and transphobic bullshit. Like, I literally have a ton of screenshot of people saying that in 2019. Not 2009, 2019. The cultural impact that pansexuality had helped to spread a ton of stereotypes and misinformation about bisexuality. 

2. Because of the biphobia of the pansexual community. Like I said above, pansexuals still spread stereotypes about bisexuality to defend pansexuality, such as “bi means two, pan means all”. If people call out biphobia, they get called bigots, panphobes (thats exactly why i semi ironically have “panphobic queen” in my bio) or TERFs.

3. Because the rethoric “its fine to be uncomfortable with bisexuality, use this other label that was born out of biphobia and still hasn’t escaped its roots” is extremely problematic.

In a society where LGBT people are seen as dirty, sinful, immoral and deviants and that makes sure to say that stuff loud and clear its normal that some LGBT people internalize that shit.

The reaction to “hey, calling myself gay makes me uncomfortable” shouldn’t be “valid, lets make up a new word that means the same but in a ~woke~ way”, it should be “lets dismantle and actively fight the system that makes people uncomfortable with those words”. And its even worse for bisexuality, cause even in our community is often stigmatized and stereotyped (and while LGT people don’t have the power to oppress us, the biphobia in our community does harm us quite a lot).

Of course people are gonna be uncomfortable with bisexuality. That label has a huge baggage and a huge history of discrimination tied to it. Of course people would rather choose to use with a label born to be all inclusive and not with the “transphobic” and “enbyphobic” one. However, that mindset is incredibly damaging to bisexuals and the bisexual community.

Not acknowledging WHY the bisexual label makes you uncomfortable and opting out of the dismantling process of all those things that makes it uncomfortable with a convenient new label does more harm than good to bisexuals.

Actually, it reinforces that! I’ve lost count of how many times i’ve seen posts by pansexuals that really boiled down to “WE are attracted to someone’s soul and personality and we don’t care about gender unlike those bisexuals, who always care about your gender”.

Hell, just a couple of days ago i’ve seen an article by a pansexual person literally saying “i experience attraction in a different way than most people, i don’t look at someone wondering what their genitals look like or what it would be like to fuck them” (an almost word per word quote) as if everyone but pansexuals are creeps who wonder about strangers’ genitals.

Also, pansexuals are the very last ones that should say “let people identify how they wish!” cause all they’ve done is forcedly redefining bisexuality in order to validate pansexuality. Ever wondered why the definition of pansexuality changes every other day? Because you keep inventing a new one every time bisexuals point out that the previous is biphobic. You keep twisting the definition of bisexuality and ignoring our history and our voices to accomodate your made up biphobic label. 

You like to scream “let us identify how we want” every time we bring up the very valid issues that we have with your label and maybe you don’t realize that, but its just another way to silence us when we try to speak up.

The only thing we’ve been asking you is to not shit all over out history and activism, to listen to us when we bring up our issues and to have a bit of critical thought about your label and community. You would think its the bare minimum but the fact that we need to have this conversation every two weeks proves that you refuse to do that.

I never meant to be harmful, I never meant to hurt anyone or exclude anyone, my original post was meant to spread positivity.

Thank you people who replied to this, for completely destroying my mental health to feel better about yourselves

But genuine thank you to the people who dmmed me after seeing this post, telling me that they were here for me, I appreciate you so much.

Bi is attraction to one or more genders and bi people can have a preference in gender

Pan is attraction to ALL genders and identities.

“We’re attracted to ALL genders, we dont care about gender” homophobic and biphobic

“We include trans people!” HEAVILY transphobic

“We’re attracted to ALL genders, we don’t care about gender” I really don’t see the connection to bi and homophobia? Were just saying we don’t care about what gender our partner identifies as!

I don’t agree with the “we include trans people” at all and it’s stupid, I agree and therefore it’s very rare to find a pansexual person who actually says that my dude.

The only definitions of Pansexuality there is, are either Biphobic or transphobic.

You and every other Pansexual are changing the definition of bisexual and claiming bi/pan are different.

They're not.

That's it.

There is no bi/pan solidarity.

I'm not saying every Pansexual is consciously Biphobic. I'm saying the existence of 'Pansexuality' is.

Most people who are Pansexual don't see themselves as Biphobic because they're misinformed/uneducated about bisexuality, and don't understand that what they're say is Biphobic.

Pansexuality is not trying to make Bi people ashamed or call them uninclusive. Believe what you want about pan and Bi being the same thing, but don’t go around hating on pan people! I don’t care what you believe but you’re doing the exact thing that you say pan people are doing to Bi people. You’re making US feel ashamed, you are making US doubt ourselves and that is a horrible feeling that I wouldn’t wish on anyone. That’s exactly why is use my blog mainly to spread positivity about everything lgbtq+ its never my intention to make anyone feel ashamed of who they are (unless they’re a Terf or a pedo in which case fuck right off but yknow)

I’m gonna end this discussion here because I am tired and this is not good for my mental health. Reply with hate all you want, this is my last reply.

Bi is attraction to one or more genders and bi people can have a preference in gender

Pan is attraction to ALL genders and identities.

“We’re attracted to ALL genders, we dont care about gender” homophobic and biphobic

“We include trans people!” HEAVILY transphobic

“We’re attracted to ALL genders, we don’t care about gender” I really don’t see the connection to bi and homophobia? Were just saying we don’t care about what gender our partner identifies as!

I don’t agree with the “we include trans people” at all and it’s stupid, I agree and therefore it’s very rare to find a pansexual person who actually says that my dude.

The only definitions of Pansexuality there is, are either Biphobic or transphobic.

You and every other Pansexual are changing the definition of bisexual and claiming bi/pan are different.

They're not.

That's it.

There is no bi/pan solidarity.

Bi is attraction to one or more genders and bi people can have a preference in gender

Pan is attraction to ALL genders and identities.

“We’re attracted to ALL genders, we dont care about gender” homophobic and biphobic

“We include trans people!” HEAVILY transphobic

“We’re attracted to ALL genders, we don’t care about gender” I really don’t see the connection to bi and homophobia? Were just saying we don’t care about what gender our partner identifies as!

I don’t agree with the “we include trans people” at all and it’s stupid, I agree and therefore it’s very rare to find a pansexual person who actually says that my dude.

2. Bi does not mean “Two or more”. Bi has always meant all. You can ask every bi person on this fucking hellsite and they well tell you that. The issue with you pannies is that 90% of you got the wrong definition of what bisexuality actually is, because if you knew youd realise how fucking unnecessary and biphobic your label is.

3. You cant claim to not be biphobic and then go “Oh so Im attracted to all, yknow like a bisexual but Id rather label myself with the more woke version.”

4. There is no reason to prefer the label pan over bi, both literally have the same definition. The only difference is that pan is p fucking transphobic with their “hearts not parts ;PP” and “Id date trans ppl too!!1″ bullshit. Literally stop trying to be woke yall are just bi people with internalized biphobia and a need to be a lil extra QuIrKy and woke than the rest.

1- I can for a fact assure that there are people that agree with me that pan people don’t have preferences

2- Bi means 2, that’s literally its definition, if I was an asshole I’d say “Bi is only attraction to male and female” but I don’t say that BECAUSE ITS NOT TRUE

3- I DO NOT CARE WHAT YOU LABEL YOURSELF AS I identify more with the label Pansexual, some people prefer Bisexual, that’s fine.

4-for once I agree with you! I despise the “hearts not parts” and “I’d date trans people” because trans people are men and women too and I don’t think everyone else only thinks about what people have in their pants.

5- and that’s just stupid, I’m not attracted to animals, children, objects or anything else. This point is so stupid I don’t even know how to explain how stupid it is. All as in all genders, not all things.

Bi is attraction to one or more genders and bi people can have a preference in gender

Pan is attraction to ALL genders and identities.

“We’re attracted to ALL genders, we dont care about gender” homophobic and biphobic

“We include trans people!” HEAVILY transphobic

“We’re attracted to ALL genders, we don’t care about gender” I really don’t see the connection to bi and homophobia? Were just saying we don’t care about what gender our partner identifies as!

I don’t agree with the “we include trans people” at all and it’s stupid, I agree and therefore it’s very rare to find a pansexual person who actually says that my dude.

Bi is attraction to one or more genders and bi people can have a preference in gender

Pan is attraction to ALL genders and identities.

“We’re attracted to ALL genders, we dont care about gender” homophobic and biphobic

“We include trans people!” HEAVILY transphobic

“We’re attracted to ALL genders, we don’t care about gender” I really don’t see the connection to bi and homophobia? Were just saying we don’t care about what gender our partner identifies as!

I don’t agree with the “we include trans people” at all and it’s stupid, I agree and therefore it’s very rare to find a pansexual person who actually says that my dude.

Bi is attraction to one or more genders and bi people can have a preference in gender

Pan is attraction to ALL genders and identities.

“We’re attracted to ALL genders, we dont care about gender” homophobic and biphobic

“We include trans people!” HEAVILY transphobic

“We’re attracted to ALL genders, we don’t care about gender” I really don’t see the connection to bi and homophobia? Were just saying we don’t care about what gender our partner identifies as!

I don’t agree with the “we include trans people” at all and it’s stupid, I agree and therefore it’s very rare to find a pansexual person who actually says that my dude.

hiya! I figured id make an informational post about the little things ive noticed about being on testosterone that I found weren’t talked about a lot when I was starting my transition and even before when I was doing my research. I think that trans sexual health is an extremely important part of trans peoples lives (and that doesnt necessarily mean sex) seeing as the physical changes that happen during transition are often foreign to us. Sexual health keeps us healthy and comfortable in our bodies, so do your best to stay attentive to your body’s changes! As always, consult your doctor if you feel the need to. These are only tips ive learned from transitioning myself and from my doctor when I asked about certain things.