fawf

I'll address the "controversy" of the week. I'm only doing this due to the constant harassment of blogs like @american-neurotypical and @stalinpig and @ihaveacrushonbitchautism . I didn't even want to talk about this and I'm frustrated that it's come to this point.

I'm sure you've already seen what people have been saying about me, and while it's a foul and severe thing to do- its not something I've ever done, nor do I plan to.

I'm sorry,

to the communities that this has affected, I'm very sorry. I never meant to harm you in the time it took me to address this. I hope we can all move on soon, and we don't have to argue about this shit anymore.

I try to stay in my own lane, in my own business and focus on my own shit. I don't know why others can't do the same but fine.

fine.

to preface this,

it's not true. it's all lies. it's all calculated gossip being spread around by @american-neurotypical who was my former ally.

still, to address it head on.

I did not poop my pants, in fact, I do not even own pants and I have never ever even pooped a day in my life.

I'll address the "controversy" of the week. I'm only doing this due to the constant harassment of blogs like @american-neurotypical and @stalinpig and @ihaveacrushonbitchautism . I didn't even want to talk about this and I'm frustrated that it's come to this point.

I'm sure you've already seen what people have been saying about me, and while it's a foul and severe thing to do- its not something I've ever done, nor do I plan to.

I'm sorry,

to the communities that this has affected, I'm very sorry. I never meant to harm you in the time it took me to address this. I hope we can all move on soon, and we don't have to argue about this shit anymore.

I try to stay in my own lane, in my own business and focus on my own shit. I don't know why others can't do the same but fine.

fine.

to preface this,

it's not true. it's all lies. it's all calculated gossip being spread around by @american-neurotypical who was my former ally.

still, to address it head on.

I did not poop my pants, in fact, I do not even own pants and I have never ever even pooped a day in my life.

Because what the fuck do you mean you're celebrating the death of U.S. Military personnel in Iran? I'm the first person to criticize the military, but holy fucking shit balls.

"They're not living to my moral purity standards and not like me so they should die."

Silence of the Lambs, Ace Ventura, RHPS, Sleepaway Camp, Longlegs, Psycho, the list goes on and on and on and The Hateful Image of You lives on in the hearts of everyone around us and TME people expect us to just, not care? Is it so hard to empathize with a trans woman for one minute that they can't even conceive of having The Hateful Image of You depicting yourself in a warped portrait with blood smeared on it and how it makes us feel? Especially that its a beloved community gathering thing to take part in The Hateful Image of You? That The Hateful Image of You unites everyone else in enjoying it? That the sharing of it perpetuates its renewal over and over again?

Jonathan Joss was an Indigenous, gay man who was murdered on the first day of Pride month as well as Indigenous History Month. He died protecting his trans husband. Homophobia and racism aren’t marks of the past, and this is a heart breaking reminder of that.

Solidarity is a weird thing… all of a sudden you’re seeing the Pope on your dash and the tea is… piping hot? (To offset the Vatican.va link, here's a tl;dr from The Onion.) ... Look at him go!

(Disagreements with his Holiness aside, it’s great to see a powerful figure power taking the side of the people.) ... EDIT: Wake up babe, a new Inquisition just dropped - apparently, not even the Pope can escape being wrongly accused by AI "verifiers."

filing all of that under mere "disagreements" signals how unprincipled this reaction you perform is. this framing only holds if you've already decided that opposition to AI is the only relevant axis, and the actual politics, the actual institutional record, the actual people on the receiving end of church policy, gets brushed aside because it's inconvenient to the posts you want to make.

a position that evaluates institutions by whether they've said something useful about your issue, and brackets everything else as secondary, has no mechanism for discerning if praising what is among the most reactionary institution of our time making one statement that aligns with your interests while continuing to cause serious harm in every direction its power reaches is a good choice. the reflex of single-issue politics ends up celebrating an institution with a documented record of what it does with the dignity of people actually vulnerable to it, on the basis that it produced however many words useful to the discourse.