The Architecture of Loss

This work is not just writing. It is listening for the detail the room needs, the sentence the family cannot find yet, and the quiet evidence that a person was here. A professional eulogy starts before the first line.

Read the full piece here:

Use four parts.

Identity anchor. Story clusters. Loss transition. Final image.

That is enough to begin.

Write one sentence under each heading before you try to write the whole eulogy. The point is not to make it perfect. The point is to give the page a shape, so the love has somewhere to speak from.

This is the shape underneath a eulogy that actually reaches the room.

Not a timeline. Not a list of facts. Not every story the family can remember.

The work is quieter than that: finding the identity anchor, grouping the right stories, naming the loss without drowning in it, and leaving the room with one final image they can carry.

A good eulogy is not built from everything. It is built from what matters.

Structure is not the enemy of emotion.

When grief is raw, a blank page can feel impossible. A clear eulogy structure does not make the tribute cold or manufactured. It gives the love somewhere to land.

The room does not need to see the framework. It needs to feel the person.

A small digital plan is not morbid. It is mercy.

Set a legacy contact. Write down the accounts that matter. Decide what should be kept, deleted or memorialised. Say clearly whether you would ever want your photos, messages or voice used by AI after you die.

Then tell one trusted person where the plan lives.

Grief is hard enough without a locked phone.

This is where the article came from: not one neat idea, but a table full of questions.

Who owns the record of a life? Where does grief go when the archive is online? What happens when the phone becomes the grief object?

The research moved between law, memory, platform rules, AI afterlife ethics and the very ordinary reality of someone scrolling through a dead person’s messages at 2am. Not science fiction. Tuesday.

The internet has given grief a new place to live.

A person can die, but their voice notes, message threads, photos, playlists and old accounts may remain locked inside platforms, passwords and policies. Sometimes the loss is not only the person. It is the record of them disappearing too.

That second loss is still loss.

The emotion is real. The shape is what lets the room hold it.

↳ Read here

View the matching Pinterest pin

They are failing because grief gives them a brutal window and too many decisions at once.

↳ Read here

View the matching Pinterest pin

It makes them tired, reactive, guilty, numb and expected to choose everything anyway.

↳ Read here

View the matching Pinterest pin

It does not need tricks. It needs shape, memory, truth and a goodbye that lands.

↳ Read here

View the matching Pinterest pin

The emotion is real. The shape is what lets the room hold it.

↳ Read here

View the matching Pinterest pin

It does not need tricks. It needs shape, memory, truth and a goodbye that lands.

↳ Read here

View the matching Pinterest pin

Families are asked to make permanent decisions while their minds are still trying to understand what happened.

↳ Read here

View the matching Pinterest pin

Think in two jobs.

The celebrant leads the service. The eulogy brings the person back into the room. When those two jobs get blurred, people often reach for ceremony language and lose the human voice.

Start with one true memory. Then ask: what story sounds most like them? That is usually where the real tone returns. You do not need polished tribute language. You need something recognisable, speakable and true.