A Librarian with volume control issues.

“Person going to work on a windy day"

“Woman who’s having her bang cut but the hairdresser is nowhere to be found"

"Zookeeper in charge of the pandas"

Nickname: Ro

Pronouns: she/her

Height: 5’2”

Sexuality: heteroromantic 

Favorite animal: dogs

Dogs or cats: dogs 

Current time: 8:41 pm (EST)

Dream job: Where I can have my dog with me and be happy, so I guess now - living in Zoom world I can have my dog and do my job

When I made this blog: Summer 2019

Why I made this blog: JB Fandom-after the suckfest of S8; I had one that I made back in 2012 that died by the end of 2015; don’t know why I decided to come back…

Reason for URL: pen name

Followers: 478

Following: 1,001 

Thing I’m into that none of my mutuals are: Changing adding another fandom to my rebloggin’ and creative pursuits and they ended up (ongoing!) unfollowing me… Bye! 

http://www.constitution.org/uslaw/defunlaw.htm

“Story affirmed the right of self-defense by persons held illegally. In his own writings, he had admitted that ‘a situation could arise in which the checks-and-balances principle ceased to work and the various branches of government concurred in a gross usurpation.’ There would be no usual remedy by changing the law or passing an amendment to the Constitution, should the oppressed party be a minority.

“Story concluded, ‘If there be any remedy at all … it is a remedy never provided for by human institutions.’ That was the ‘ultimate right of all human beings in extreme cases to resist oppression, and to apply force against ruinous injustice.’” (From Mutiny on the Amistad by Howard Jones, Oxford University Press, 1987, an account of the reading of the decision in the case by Justice Joseph Story of the Supreme Court.)”

“An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery.” (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).

Say it with me percedence doesn’t matter in this court as much as you think it does. State v Robertson is a district court case and it has no baring on the Supreme Court.

Zappos Now Sells SINGLE SHOES! Check it out.

NO JUSTICE NO PEACE!