
roma★
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

Product Placement

JBB: An Artblog!

titsay

shark vs the universe
ojovivo

JVL
h

PR's Tumblrdome

@theartofmadeline

Andulka
hello vonnie

Show & Tell
taylor price
NASA

Discoholic 🪩
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Indonesia
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from Australia
seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Croatia

seen from Belgium

seen from Australia
@anacoluthas

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
"what would you do in this situation?"
i would sell airbrushed tshirts of spongebob smoking weed at the oceanfront
Joyrene Ngwarraye Holmes, Wildflowers, 2024. Acrylic on linen.
is it true that it's happening to everybody?
baby it really and truly is

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I’m avoiding some stuff so excuse my blogging
by Hirō Isono
Fascinated by the negative responses to your 'is Ilya a service top? no' post (which I agree with btw) so I hope you don't mind me sending you thoughts which you can ofc ignore if you like. Because some of the things people said chime with a thing I have seen play out in other places where people with submissive tendencies/less interest in the experience of the dominant partner will sometimes wish for someone to be mean to them (or hurt them, or engage in a fantasy of cruelty etc) but not want someone who truly WANTS to be mean to them (etc) because that feels too dangerous and scary. And this results in fantasies that describe the dominant partner's experience entirely through the curation of the submissive's experience which ties most closely into service topping. And leads to a rule set/culture that serves to constrain BDSM dynamics, which is actually deeply uncomfortable with particularly the dom's desires (but also BDSM in general). Bc if doms are not allowed to enjoy the sadism part of BDSM then why are they doing it? Why is anyone engaging in this if they are not seeking pleasure? Surely it is more beautiful that their desires were made for each other before they met, rather than one partner shaping themselves for the other? Anyway I thought it was fascinating how strongly people reacted against your read of Ilya, and I think it was because it was too much in the perspective of dominant pleasure for some people who have never examined a dynamic they enjoy from the other side.
Yes, excellent ask, thank you! And I’ll add onto that —
For sure people are scared of the real life desire for cruelty, and I think you're right that it lends itself to some people wanting doms & sadists to be essentially playacting or only doing it because of external pressure/being of service, rather than having an intrinsic want-lust-need for enacting that cruelty themselves. Because then we're getting into territory that asks us to humanize the people (my Ilya!) with that desire for cruelty, but isn't that just the definition of a Bad person? Or a broken person, in need of fixing or healing or getting help?
I'm gonna go on record and say that it feels TO ME very much in line with a culturally Christian value set to place more judgement on someone's desires or interior motivations than on the outcome of their actions. If your desire for enacting cruelty ends with hurting someone else who, ultimately, isn't getting what they want out of the experience, then yeah - it's your responsibility to right that wrong. To apologize and make amends or do what it takes to rebuild trust. But if your desire for enacting cruelty ends with hurting someone who *is* getting what they want out of that experience - whatever that means to them - then great! Ethically, it doesn't matter what your internal motivations were. It doesn't matter whether you're doing it because you like it for your own sake or because you think someone else will like it for theirs. But wouldn't it be more fun for everyone if we were all acting in line with our own intrinsic desires, rather than what's expected or imposed upon us?
I’m reminded of a line from a wonderful stucky BDSM fic I read years ago (the bene castigat series by Nonymos, which is excellent fyi) where the dom character says ‘Sometimes he thought subs had it easier; they didn’t hurt anyone, even in their dreams.’
I think this is basically the conflict for people, where readers are (generally) coming at things from a submissive point of view, because their fantasies often feel safer when they simultaneous absolve themselves of the guilt and shame around those desires by having the dominant be in control, by having something done *to* them rather than participating in something that feels taboo or shameful. There’s nothing wrong with that obvs, I’m not trying to kink shame, but I do think it means that people don’t want to examine what it means to want the same things from the opposite point of view, because then they have to confront the fact that this is sometime two people are choosing together, and they have to confront all that shame and guilt again when there isn’t that more socially acceptable buffer of a lack of agency any more. But if Shane isn’t dirty or wrong or shameful for wanting Ilya to hurt him, why do people fail to see it isn’t for Ilya to want to hurt him either?
Also, maybe this is too woke but…I think it’s also related to how people don’t want to examine their own sadistic tendencies, which are increasingly prevalent with the rise in reactionary politics - lots of people want to burn someone else at the stake for their mistakes these days, to see people be punished for every minor transgression, but no one wants to examine the fact that we have that urge to hurt someone else or make them suffer. A dominant or sadist who is honest about enjoying someone else’s pain is threatening to the cognitive dissonance most people walk around with re:punishment and cruelty.
OOOOOH can i jump in to talk about purity culture as it relates to cultural framing of dominance and submission?
because we're right on the money regarding the absolution of the masochist. christianity (and by extension, cultural christianity) has morality through victimhood baked into it. the idea that suffering has a causal relationship to moral purity is foundational, built into the gospels, at the very root.
and then we add purity culture to the mix. purity culture has two sides for "each gender." for women, those two sides are: 1) you do not desire; 2) men's desire is dangerous to them, so you must protect them. for men, those two sides are: 1) your desire is dangerous, and you must resist it; 2) any woman who pursues you sexually or romantically is dangerous, and you must resist her.
so we see here ^^ that pursuing pleasure, being the aggressor, wanting someone and taking action to get them is Dangerous and Bad and Evil and Sinful. nobody in that equation actually wants a man to desire a woman, or for a woman to desire a man. they want the carefully controlled and sanitized performance of desire (chivalry & courtship) that then cut-scenes straight to pregnancy. the actual desire is a threat.
generally, left-ish and leftist spaces have done a good job at acknowledging that women are people and therefore have desires. but the other parts of purity culture? the ideas that a man's desire is inherently dangerous, that sexually "aggressive" women are dangerous, that it's never okay to be the aggressor? oh we've done fuck all with those. those are still EVERYWHERE. and lets be fucking forreal, we still culturally associate masochism and submission with women and sadism and dominance with men. obviously that isn't how BDSM actually plays out in the real world, but we'd also be goofy to pretend that those cultural associations aren't coloring the way we think about BDSM.
so ilya wanting shane and taking control of shane and wanting to hurt shane already puts ilya on the moral backfoot in this equation. he's doing everything that waves purity culture red flags. he needs to repent via victimhood, and therefore he needs to be shown the pleasure of bottoming, of submission.
and don't think i didn't clock the original sin framework where grigori and ilya are concerned. eve grigori did wrong, which means that ilya is born into sin starts off needing control but once he's ready to repent healed and forsaken the world settled down with shane, THEN he'll be ready to accept the lord into his heart try submission with shane and that will save him because he "deserves" it.
!!!!!!!! @awakenedpotential:
#there’s definitely this idea that is taught to us#responsibility to the larger collective#it isn’t enough to sacrifice yourself for just one other person#that choice has to have moral backing#and those morals are determined by the collective#not by two people in a relationship#so the framing that ilya IS a service dom or subtop (not just can be) is there so that he’s only doing these things for shane yes#but there’s this added layer of he needs to be these things it needs to be there in the writing#so that the viewers/readers are absolved of the sin of wanting to control his sexuality#of our own sadistic desires to strip ilya of his pleasure#otherwise- we would be leaving it up to the text/their story how they tell it#this tension also shows up in tlg so i’ve been thinking about it#how shane justifies the sacrifices that they are making by not being out in the open by stating that it would be distracting#he’s echoing organizational rhetoric#because deep down#he doesn’t really want to hide if everything would be okay#if there wasn’t social pressure
"of our own sadistic desires to strip ilya of his pleasure" EVERYBODY LISTEN UP
hang it in the louvre
pt 41/?
i left my favorite noodles on vacation i’m kind of devastated….

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Eegeevudluk Pootoogook (1931 - 1999) - Walruses at Play. 1964. Stonecut on paper.
i do things besides sexualize shane. for example im about to make pasta
People are not ready to hear this take probably but I think a significant portion of Ilya's experiences with men have been with much older men even going back to his teenage in Russia days. And yes he was dominating them. Eighteen (or younger) year old Ilya Rozanov stepping on the dick and balls of an oligarch who made Ilya wear a blindfold while he brought him into his house but now that blindfold is wrapped around the oligarch's wrists as Ilya tells him he's useless and disgusting. And yeah Ilya means it. The daddy issues are issuing. Oligarch tries to give Ilya some hush money on his way out the door and Ilya drops a crispy (AMERICAN) bill on the floor and says he's nobody's fucking whore. He's thirty and married before he even starts to confront the fact that he was still being taken advantage of even when he was the one doing the ball-stepping. Massive meltdown in therapy and then he goes home and his husband comforts him by begging for his balls to be stepped on. Circle of life.
OhHh my godddd. 🫠🫠🫠🫠 Luckily I AM ready to hear and receive this!!!! It all comes back to Ilya and how risky sex was his one form of catharsis from his shitty home life, doesn't it? It all comes back to his passive suicidal ideation that made every experience that made him feel even remotely alive seem worth it. What does it matter if the risky sex he's having is with older American men in seedy bathrooms or in the velvet lined bedroom of some oligarch from the old country?
I'm picturing this all comes out after hollanov have a talk about their childhood crushes. Shane shares his revelation about crushing on his old coach in Juniors. And Ilya teases Shane and makes him blush and squirm and obviously they fuck about it, but then afterwards Ilya casually drops: "Did you fuck him?"
"Hm? Who?"
"Your coach."
And Shane sits up from where he's been lying next to Ilya in bed to look at him in the face, to see if he's serious. He is.
"You're seriously asking me if I fucked my coach? In juniors?"
And Ilya, who lost his virginity at fourteen, does a biiig dramatic eye roll and is like "Ugh yes Shane i am asking. Or does that hurt your delicate North American sensibilities?" And he's getting a little mean with it now, to try and distract Shane from the way he's looking at him, with this pinched horrified face. "It would not be so crazy." Ilya ends up saying, a little too defensively.
And then Shane is really looking horrified as he says "Did you... Did you have sex with your coach?"
And Ilya laughs, trying to lighten the mood like: "Not my coach. But this old man, he'd come watch my games. He tried to pay me to step on his balls but I thought This is something I'd like to do to this creep for free, yes?"
Shane is not fucking laughing. He looks at Ilya all fucking,,, scandalised and just says, "Ilya, that's awful." So of course Ilya gets extremely fucking prickly about it, and they end up having a huge blow up fight, before Ilya eventually relents and tries to appeal to Galina, who looks at him with no judgement, no real discernible expression, and asks him in his own language if he really finds the memory funny. THEN we get the big cathartic breakdown.
And, as you said, hollanov reconcile via their most reliable means of communication: sex. Ilya gets to dominate his wonderful husband who he loves so so much, and the difference in agency in the two experiences is so stark, it's yet another means for Ilya to reconcile with what happened to him by overwriting it with the man he loves and who loves him. Omg this is making me emotional.
Adding @persimmony-snicket's truly CRUSHING tags about Ilya's breakdown with Galina:
beauty of nature
does doggy style mean i get a treat after

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
heated rivalry: endless gifs
describe nyc in 3 words
new york city