Hear me out, but if Mikoto's writing is supposed to focus on the stress caused by toxic Japanese work culture instead of DID cases, then maybe DID shouldn't be added in at all.
but is it not a social commentary on toxic Japanese work culture as an extension of (and one of the final steps within) Japanese culture as a whole? the Japanese culture that would allow a single mother to raise two children, whereupon the eldest grows up in a way that he believes he has never experienced anger because of the negative impact it would have on people [S1Q10]? the Japanese culture wherein child neglect and relational stress (such as in cases of divorce [S1Q16], high social and achievement expectations [S2Q1], enmeshed families [S1Q16], etc.) are both considered especially common causes of DID? the Japanese culture that would reward a baseline of dissociative compartmentalisation (aforementioned lack of awareness/tolerance towards one's own social missteps and what are deemed unacceptable personality traits), as it helps a person keep up with and succeed under grueling social and occupational demands? the Japanese culture where in spite of everything, pushing yourself so far that you drink straight from a bottle of vodka on your way home, to cope with the abusive job that you may eventually die doing, is a relative, non-pathologised norm?
the Japanese culture where, if someone â that hit all these low-profile risk factors and therefore experienced DID on a subclinical level (on account of maintained functioning, doing what is expected of him, because drinking and working himself to death, is not considered 'disorder') â were to suffer 100+ days of sleep deprivation while abusing substances, and then go on a murder spree in his cognitively impaired haze, may retroactively compartmentalise and dissociate from that too, and only then â as a result of the scrutiny placed on criminals and antisocials â have his dissociative internal structure drawn attention to?
i think he makes for a really interesting fictional case study, about how much suffering and abuse we sweep under the rug, up until someone explodes, and how it is often only when the person has made disorder onto society (through violence, or not being able to work) that any sort of diagnosis (and thus acknowledgement of 'some issue') is made. and especially how, in response to 'some issue' that has been indicated, we always look at the person in question as an individual and isolated problem, who â on account of the diagnosis we then apply to them âmust have been dysfunctional from the start, and done what he did, because of his innate 'disorder'.
and i think DID was an especially good choice for this thought experiment, because of how clearly it encourages a common debate, around to what extent someone's behaviour is 'theirs' and to what extent it is their 'mental illness'. and it also makes me very very happy, as a pwDID, to see mikoto overcoming his lifetime of dissociation, suppression, and self-hatred that brought him to the current moment, and acknowledge that yes, at the end of the day, he did not do what he did because he was irrational or possessed, and that the parts of him that identify with his awful acts still deserve sympathy and collaboration. because while he perpetrated horrible things, it was as a whole person, for reasons that were understandable, and never should have come to be.
Fair point, but I think why a lot of people are angry with Mikoto's case is because of how it was presented, along with minor frustrations from other prisoners before him. With other prisoners, it was more straightforward and it all came together in the end - Yuno's about how we view girls with abortions, Fuuta who unintentionally caused the victim to commit suicide from cyberbullying, Muu being the imperfect victim from bullying, Kazui using his wife to save himself to look normal, and Amane raised to follow what the cult taught her and to carry out. Even for cases that got cut short, it was still obvious if we should forgive someone like Haruka who's neglected and killed those weaker than him for attention, Shidou for killing others so easily despite being a doctor, and Mahiru being oblivious about her boyfriend's feelings that led to his death. Even though some cases had some misses with how it was represented (Yuno, Shidou and Mahiru), the question they represent clearly linked to their crimes from beginning to end.
Problem with Mikoto is that his case was presented more as "Should we forgive those who had DID?" for two trials instead of "Should we forgive those who worked under stressful working environment and then snapping?" as intended. Putting aside how DID is formed, Mikoto's MVs from Trial 1 and Trial 2 were focused on his DID instead of how work caused him to develop DID. DOUBLE actually showed a hint of it, but it was only shown for maybe 5 seconds before the rest of the MV showed John killing random people for Mikoto's sanity, making fans believe it was the trigger for John to front. Also, it was suddenly revealed at the end of Requiem that John killed 12 people within 48 hours instead of it being a nightly event, like everyone thought it was. And along with the interrogations given to us, fans ofc would make speculations that Mikoto had a traumatic childhood that led him to develop DID since he doesn't even know why his parents divorced (S2Q4) and believe he just recalled being nice to everyone and never being negative because John fronted during those times (S1Q10).
If Mikoto is supposed to represent "forgiving people working in toxic work culture", then making him have DID wasn't necessary. As I keep hearing online, that's not how it's developed and having John suddenly form to kill random people to relieve Mikoto's stress felt a bit like half-baked writing. When I re-watched him drink that bottle of alcohol before his 48 hour black out and John killed 12 people offscreen, I thought "They could have made Mikoto snapping and killing random people under the influence of alcohol before crashing for 48 hours." Or they could have had Mikoto did snap and kill people, but refuse to acknowledge it or keep on making excuses like a coward. But in the end, it felt more like the fans were lead on this was about forgiving someone with DID that they're not aware of, when it's not really about that.
All in all, Mikoto's case was a huge miss compared to other prisoners and I can understand why fans are angry at this point. As for me, I still love Mikoto and John, but I think whatever they're supposed to represent could have been done better. Granted, toxic work culture with John forced to front for Mikoto's sake could have worked, but again, could have been better.
















