Mossy Fluorite

There are very few times I would say outright homelessness is better than any program or group home.

I don't really like how the article glosses over the actual scenes involving the main character when she was 3 years old (not the content specifically but the fact the scenes involved the character when she was 3 years old, as it feels a bit misleading in the article without that context) as the inciting evidence for why she's being forced to either re-write the book or scrap it entirely, but I figure'd I'd post the update to the Tori Woods/Daddy's Little Toy legal battle in Australia.

Specifically the courts found the book did contain child abuse material due to some previously mentioned scenes within the book when the character was 3 years old where a grown adult man attempted to physically assault (and had to be physically held back by other adults) her or graphically fantasized about doing so.

Tori Woods wasn't sentenced jail time but was given an 18 month period for community corrections and will be on the Child Protections Register for about 8 years (the article does not tell if this means she's on the offendry list or this means Austraila's CPS will be monitoring her children or her behavior around children during these 8 years)

I have exactly zero knowledge of the person who wrote the doc or the context surrounding the main doc. I gave up reading it a few pages in because I just didn't have enough context about the Discord that got deleted or the people involved and the doc was kind of shit at explaining it.

The way Lily death grips her POV that Elves are built to be Warriors when she is applying only her own stance as a WoW player without realizing that different franchises treat Elves differently is a thing.

It's honestly really fascinating.

(Also love the part where she treats Elf like a Class similar to Barbarian or Fighter. That part made my brain stop for a second to try and process what she was implying)

This response is going to be a bit rambly because I'm tired, so I'll try to be to the point where I can.

Honestly the Doc doesn't really add anything new to the 'discussion' other than adding more screenshots in the mix and making me look at another doc featuring a whole host of drama I knew nothing about and honestly am still struggling to understand a fair bit cause the doc leaves out some rather (in my opinion) important context for the situation between Creme and that server and what have you.

But I'm not commenting on that situation.

I will also state this isn't in defense of Britt, this is just me viewing the doc and the feelings I have about it as a third party reading it and the evidence shown. I'm being fair where I feel, but overall this is a very subjective topic.

I also want to make it clear: None of this negates the awareness that Britt has raised concerning Lily Orchard, Patricia Taxxon, Pocket Deer Belly, and people need to stop using it as a way to discredit the awareness she has raised on those fronts. You can find someone a cunt but agree they did something good, no one is required to be some Saint at all times and in a Drama Sphere we are all playing in the mud and no one is clean. Stop trying to moral grandstand that you are better then anyone else on this front.

For the Britt doc my main points are:

The doc has a MASSIVE Issue of ignoring the Larger Picture to Cherry Pick the smaller pictures out of context. This makes the doc as a whole very hard for me to take seriously in many respects.

I don't know if Britt actually knew anyone involved in the Creme Situation prior to commenting. I agree it's a situation that she probably shouldn't have gotten involved in and a fair bit of it read like people that just couldn't in the moment actually communicate what the issues were and it spiraled. I don't know enough about this situation to fully comment on it however.

NSFW doesn't mean porn, it just means mature content not suitable for all ages and can include a variety of topics from heavy violence, body horror, vulgarity, pornographic material, slurs, ect. Wikipedia even goes over this as it being an umbrella term to mean for content one would not want to be consuming in a public or professional setting. Almost the entire NSFW section of the doc I threw out because the writer of the doc was pedantic about terminology when it benefited them to try and label Britt as things earlier on, then decided to go NSFW = Porn when referencing gothic and non-sexual furry imagery on Britt's NSFW alt. Is some of the images weird and out there? Yeah, but if the writer of the doc is going to be pedantic about wording and definitions, I'm not going to give them grace when they are misusing a term to suit their narrative later on. Stay consistent or shut up.

The study doesn't say what you are claiming it does, you are cherry picking a quote out of context to make the claim it's saying something it doesn't. The study is about brain development from a chemical/biological standpoint, not a mental maturity standpoint

Also if you are easily triggered by sexuality, symbolic or implied, and furry art and decide to look at a NSFW blog then honestly that's on you. The blog was labeled NSFW and is hidden from searches, you knew what you were potentially going to look at before you hit the link you don't get to bitch about the tagging afterword.

Also I find it incredibly disgusting that during this section the writer decided to imply that Britt isn't a lesbian, or is pretending to be. The doc gives Britt a lot of shit on her wording in some areas towards transgender individuals but also has no problems sitting there and making the implication that she is either a zoophile or not a lesbian over a wolf-themed Dildo and some Monster Themed art. Which also tells me you don't spend very much time with Lesbians at all and I'm going to make the claim here that the person writing the doc doesn't realize just how homophobic that is or how often that is levied against lesbian women. I will give them more grace then they are giving anyone else in that they likely do not understand just how offensive and insensitive it is to sit there and claim that knowing full well they understand the implications considering they were using the same tactic against Britt.

Also I am going to suggest that the writer of the doc look up some studies considering symbology within women's literature with monsters and how much of it is often an allegory for feminine rage, survival, breaking free from patriarchal control, feminine sexuality and liberation, and more. It could just be that Britt is a furry with a thing for Werewolves, but gothic imagery using wolves as a stand-in for Feminine Rage and Feminine Sexual Liberation is a pretty common thing. I won't claim it's a misogyny thing to not know that Feminine Literature and Art tends to have this trend, but I will make the claim if you didn't even do a whiff of research before trying to imply a bunch of gothic-themed artists who use the symbolism as drawing zoophilia.

Britt's wording choices in some areas are very poor, I'll agree that some of it ("Genuine Trans" being a standout on this) is definitely not something she should have said or implied. That said she's not wrong for in the beginning being a bit doubtful that Lily Orchard was actually trans when Lily was actively using the Tara Callie alt to speculate if Britt would be attracted to her if she became a woman. It doesn't hold up in the here and now when Lily has transitioned, but I understand where the thought process came from all things considered. This was actually the one thing I actually felt had merit from Fennec's original doc: Britt showing doubt or calling it 'convenient' when someone transitioned or suddenly had a claim to a minority group when they started getting backlash.

The entire section about her dating and sleeping with a 15-16 year old when she was 18-19 still feels stupid. Should she have done it? No. Should she have talked about the other individual like that with Lily at the time? Also no. But trying to claim she's a pedophile over it feels rather disingenuous and cherry picking.

I don't like that the doc reams over Britt for how she talked to Lily concerning these topics then at the very end admits they are aware Britt was being groomed and manipulated by Lily Orchard. In a vaccum the behavior looks abhorrent but when you take in the context that at the same time Lily was actively manipulating Britt, something Lily has also done to others, towards Paraphilias and to get her own gratification out of it REALLY paints a dark picture on whether the person who wrote the doc actually believes Britt is a victim or if they were trying to discredit Britt being one. I agree that it's not right how Britt spoke, acted, or should have, but I can also look at the larger picture and understand the WHY she talked that way and give her the grace that she has matured since then and gotten help for it.

I don't think Britt is ableist I think she just kept using language that was more 'acceptable' in the 90's-00's and much like with Sai and the R-Slur just hasn't unpacked that and stopped. If you see it in the moment, call it out. It's not language that should be used but from personal experience if you are polite about pointing out it makes you uncomfortable she stops and apologizes.

I agree that Britt does have a tendency to focus quite harshly on transgender individuals. That's on her and she probably should reflect on that. Doesn't negate the awareness she raises about Lily, Patricia Taxxon, PDB, ect.

I'll say it before and I'll say it again: If you have a Twitter/X Account you don't have a leg to stand on by using Kiwifarms as a sign of someone being Transphobic. Does Kiwifarms have an issue with Transphobia? Yup. So does Tumblr, Twitter/X, Reddit, 4chan, ect. Some of those sites get the added bonus of being run by a literal Nazi (such as the case of Twitter/X). It's similar to the talking points about Ethical Consumption in a Capitalist Society.

Generally speaking there is a conversation to be had here about some of the behaviors, but at the end of the day it's really hard for me to take seriously when the docs are being used to try and completely discredit Britt's side as a victim of Lily Orchard and the doc only referencing that fact at the tail end as a footnote.

The problem I have with that is because by doing so, it completely ignores some very MASSIVE context for why and how Britt responds the way she does when the topic of Lily is used in the doc. You can't provide evidence that Britt is being transphobic towards Lily and claim she's transphobic about it and then 50 pages later reveal that pre-transition Lily was grooming and manipulating her. Because that paints Britt's stance and wording choices in a very different light when you factor that in.

Especially when part of the doc gives grace to someone else lashing out at the person they were victimized for, but Britt doing the same thing is suddenly demonized to hell and proof she's a terrible person.

The thing is, the doc does show Britt has some behavioral problems she should probably work on and see a licensed professional about. But it also shows the MASSIVE double standard some people have towards her.

it honestly wouldn't surprise me in the least.

I won't speculate to heavily on that regard, but considering how Lily acts towards Mikaila during streams I really can't imagine Mikaila is having any better of a time off stream either.

As someome who has been in an abusive and extremely controlling relationship I do sympathize quite a bit with Mikaila on that front and want to give her all the grace and empathy if/when she breaks it off with Lily.

Really reads like someone took Fennec's doc and ran it through ChatGPT or something to increase the Word Count. It's really hard to get through.

Not due to content, just due to odd wording choices. Did the person who wrote it not proof read it at all?

Honestly, this won't happen and I'm sorry to break it to you.

Lily Orchard is a VERY niche topic.

Even with some of her stuff breaking containment, you have to understand that the 'career ending scandal' you are implying has already happened to Lily.

And even before that, Lily wasn't really someone particularly famous. She was in a VERY niche side of youtube making fairly niche videos with only a few standouts (such as her Steven Universe video).

She won't have a blowout like Chris Chan or Onision. Her channel is Dead and basically propped up by Life Support as is, and for the most part it's quite likely her channel will stay the way it is with her being funded by it and Patreon (alongside her wife and government assistance if I had to wager a guess) until she either slips up again on a livestream and gets her channel terminated or she does something that actually gets her arrested.

The allegations on Lily have already broke Tumblr Containment believe it or not.

Search her name on Tiktok and there are more than a few viral clips talking about her and the allegations against her, and that isn't including when you search her name on Youtube and the first video to pop up is either Joon the King's, Crispy Tavern's, or one of SaiScribbles.

That said: No, I don't blame him for it. From all the allegations against Lily, Courtney, the allegations that imply his own hand in the abuse in their lives, I don't blame him for shutting down any engagement on his socials that relate to either Lily or Courtney (especially Lily though).

I'm honestly surprised he even keeps a public social media with his name on it.

Mar means Mardi (Tuesday) and we do day/month/year.

Can't say for another place or language as I'm French, but yeah, I would be surprised it's not from a French person.

Ah ok, gotcha.

Thank you for the clarification XD

This is a longshot ask, but I received a screenshot from someone of an email where the date is displayed as this.

I think advertising these kinds of things constantly and virtue signaling is more telling about how someone ACTUALLY views these issues though.

I don't make it a habit to advertise what help I do give to these kinds of topics entirely because I shouldn't need to and the idea of someone advertising it for virtue signaling or internet brownie points makes my skin crawl.

But if it's that big an issue for you to send this ask like 4 times in the last hour (Enjoy the block after this btw):

I donate to RAINN and the Trevor Project pretty frequently (every other month as my spare income allows, I also donate to my local Non-Profit Zoo and some Wildlife Conservation efforts but that's not as relevant).

If you are asking 'have I personally reached out to offer support to a victim in some financial way' I've donating to a few GoFundMe's and Fundraisers.

I work in Healthcare, specifically in Nursing Homes, but I also volunteer at least twice a year at women's shelters and this year I volunteered at my local Pride Festival.

Hearts has a disturbing habit of trying to discredit or cast doubt on other people's trauma or experiences a lot.

She does it constantly with Britt and her experiences with Lily Orchard.

She did it with Sheev.

She did it to me.

Whether it's outright mocking the person and trying to discredit it as 'being catfished' or trying to claim the person didn't bring it up until it was 'convenient to own a troll' or just straight up implying the person is lying.