'NO' is a complete sentence

notice how "every transphobic gay is a traitor" but trans people can be virulently homophobic to homosexuals and nobody bats an eye

I really want one of the "biological sex isn't real" people to explain to me how they think human reproduction works.

“life-saving healthcare” you’re giving estradiol to a man who pops a boner when he shaves his legs

most annoying thing about trans activism is how they keep trying to make transphobia happen when it’s really just classic homophobia and/or misogyny. men have always hated gender nonconformity because they hate anything that threatens male supremacy. this is not new and you are not more oppressed than women or gay people. “they hate me because I’m a trans man” they hate you because you’re female. “they hate me because I’m a trans woman” they hate you because they see you as either an effeminate male or a woman. you are literally only oppressed because society still hates gay and female people like lock in.

I am so sick of asexuals/aromantics making everything feminist about them. Female characters who don’t want to be forced into arranged marriages or who recognize that their value is not tied to their relationship with a man are “asexual.” Merida is “asexual” Barbie is “asexual” any woman who doesn’t want to be subservient to a man they aren’t attracted to is “asexual.” Feminist messages go over their head because all they can see is a woman who is willingly single and I guess they think any woman who experiences sexual attraction is just so eager to jump on someone? So the only explanation is that she must not be attracted at all, otherwise she would just date whoever shows up first? And then you get into the situations where they attribute blatant misogyny to “aphobia.” Women are shamed for not being in a relationship or having kids no matter the reason. The issue is not that someone is asexual or whatever, it’s that she’s a woman and she doesn’t answer to a man. It’s that she’s a woman whose sense of self revolves around her and not some other person. Women and girls who are killed for saying no are killed regardless of why they said no. Lesbians are killed for turning down men because they aren’t attracted to men, straight women are killed for turning down men because they’re already with another man, it doesn’t matter why she said no to the man who kills her. The “no” is the problem.

Same thing happens to women in history who, because of oppression, had to dress or pretend to be men to enjoy any semblance of freedom or independence…and suddenly she’s trans. Fuck off.

I must not delay task. Delay task is the mindkiller. Delay task is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my task. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the task has gone there will be nothing. Only completed task will remain.

“There’s an academic gender gap/boys are falling behind girls in school..” If the education gap was reversed, people would be praising boys for their intelligence. There would be no talk about girls falling behind because no one would care. Why does this conversation frame men and boys as victims? Why are we not talking about how impressive and smart women and girls are?

Radical feminists only hate transgender women because they only see you as a woman if you can reproduce. Only thinking a woman is a woman if they can give birth is not truly revolutionary and ahead of time. If you think womanhood is defined merely by being able to give birth, you need to get with the times. Suck it.

It’s not about being able to give birth, it’s about who is female and who isn’t.

Gendies hearing the word female and thinking that has anything to do with giving birth or being a mother is proof of their misogyny. Being a female is a natural fact. Just like if someone had type O negative they aren’t required to give blood, when a woman is female and has a uterus she shouldn’t be expected to give birth. She just has a uterus and is female. It’s that simple.

Radical feminists only hate transgender women because they only see you as a woman if you can reproduce. Only thinking a woman is a woman if they can give birth is not truly revolutionary and ahead of time. If you think womanhood is defined merely by being able to give birth, you need to get with the times. Suck it.

It’s not about being able to give birth, it’s about who is female and who isn’t.

Gendies hearing the word female and thinking that has anything to do with giving birth or being a mother is proof of their misogyny. Being a female is a natural fact. Just like if someone had type O negative they aren’t required to give blood, when a woman is female and has a uterus she shouldn’t be expected to give birth. She just has a uterus and is female. It’s that simple.

I’m reblogging it everytime I see it. Sorry, not sorry.

We're told repeatedly that trans women have unique struggles as compared to women, but we're not allowed to say that it's also true the other way around. The cognitive dissonance is insane.

women will never be free

But when *I* refer to makeup as a “paint-on niqab”…