The only thing that exists is consciousness. Yet at the same time consciousness cannot be proven.
And therefore these same concepts of a = -1 are infinitely abound in daily life.
Now there are several theories that point to this. simulation theory, Turing theory, the butterfly effect, the idea and concept of god and related entities, Zen Buddhism, and the list goes on and on. It applies to the whole field of mathematics even in todayâs knowledge.
In Turing theory in particular (while there are many equivalents) every possible infinite âequationâ ends with one of two answers. A loop or a stop.
If you follow the loops you get positive emotions and the concept of âgodâ / âbuddhaâ.
If you follow the stops you get negative emotions and the concept of âharmâ or âsuicideâ or âmurderâ.
The stance of negative and positive is subjective to personal viewpoints.
Neither is necessarily wrong or right per say as both sides are like two sides of the same coin. One cannot exist without the other. Thereâs parties representing both sides from many wakes of life who consider one or the other to be morally correct.
The definition per say of âgodâ or âbuddhaâ is different from one to another the same way the opposite is.
What I mean by A = -1 is that with any sort of variable in life.. be it consciousness or anything really.. it cannot be proven.
Even the concept of what âprovenâ is. Even the deepest definitions conclude with one side or the other.
As humans we live in the divide as our decisions are to us and to every other conscious being who considers us of our âmoral systemâ.
So why not question it?











