And as Aurora pricked her finger
And Pandora opened the box
And as Psyche shone a light
To see what she could not
I got inside Bluebeard's chamber
Which forcefully woke me up
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
todays bird
trying on a metaphor
Not today Justin
Xuebing Du
d e v o n
Keni

Andulka
Sweet Seals For You, Always

One Nice Bug Per Day

Product Placement

pixel skylines

blake kathryn

ellievsbear
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

Kaledo Art

Discoholic 🪩
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Poland

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Brazil
seen from Singapore

seen from Türkiye
seen from Australia
seen from Poland
seen from United States

seen from France

seen from Türkiye

seen from Mexico
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from United States
@abysswarlock
And as Aurora pricked her finger
And Pandora opened the box
And as Psyche shone a light
To see what she could not
I got inside Bluebeard's chamber
Which forcefully woke me up

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I'm asking this genuinely, as a 19 yo with no education in economics and a pretty surface level understanding of socialism: can you explain the whole Bananas discourse in a way someone like me might understand? In my understanding it's just "This is just a product we can give up to create better worker conditions and that's fine" but apparently that's not the full picture?
alright so some pretty important background to all this is that we're all talking about the fact that bananas, grown in the global south, are available year-round at extremely low prices all around europe and the USA. it's not really about bananas per so--the banana in this discourse is a synechdoche for all the economic benefits of imperialism.
so how are cheap bananas a result of imperialism? first of all i want to tackle a common and v. silly counterargument: 'oh, these ridiculous communists think it's imperialist for produce to be shipped internationally'. nah. believing that this is the communist objection requires believing in a deeply naive view of international traide. this view goes something like 'well, if honduras has lots of bananas, and people in the usa want bananas and are willing to pay for them, surely everyone wins when the usa buys bananas!'.
there are of course two key errors here and they are both packed into 'honduras has lots of bananas'. for a start, although the bananas are grown in honduras, honduras doesn't really 'have' them, because the plantations are mostly owned by chiquita (formerly known as united fruit) dole, del monte, and other multinationals--when they're not, those multinationals will usually purchase the bananas from honduran growers and conduct the export themselves. and wouldn't you know it, it's those intervening middleman steps--export, import, and retail, where the vast majority of money is made off bananas! so in the process of a banana making its way from honduras to a 7/11, usamerican multinationals make money selling the bananas to usamerican importers who make money selling them to usamerican retailers who make money selling them to usamerican customers.
when chiquita sells a banana to be sold in walmart, a magic trick is being performed: a banana is disappearing from honduras, and yet somehow an american company is paying a second american company for it! this is economic imperialism, the usamerican multinational extracting resources from a nation while simultaneously pocketing the value of those resources.
why does the honduran government allow this? if selling bananas is such a bad deal for the nation, why do they continue to export millions of dollars of banans a year? well, obviously, there's the fact that if they didn't, they would face a coup. the united states is more than willing to intervene and cause mass death and war to protect the profits of its multinationals. but the second, more subtle thing keeping honduras bound to this ridiculously unbalanced relationship is the need for dollars. because the US dollar is the global reserve currency, and the de facto currency of international trade, exporting to the USA is a basic necessity for nations like honduras, guatemala, &c. why is the dollar the global reserve currency? because of usamerican military and economic hegemony, of course. imperialism built upon imperialism!
this is unequal exchange, the neoimperialist terms of international trade that make the 'global economy' a tool of siphoning value and resources from the global south to the imperial core. & this is the second flaw to unravel in 'honduras has a lot of bananas' -- honduras only 'has a lot of bananas' because this global economic hegemony has led to vast unsustainable monoculture banana plantations to dominate the agriculture of honduras. it's long-attested how monoculture growth is unsustainable because it destroys soil and leads to easily-wiped-out-by-infection plants.
so, bananas in the USA are cheap because:
the workers that grow them are barely paid, mistreated, prevented from unionizing, and sometimes murdered
the nations in which the bananas are grown accept brutally unfair trade and tariff terms with the USA because they desperately need a supply of US dollars and so have little position to negotiate
shipping is also much cheaper than it should be because sailors are chronically underpaid and often not paid at all or forced to pay to work (!)
bananas are cheap, in conclusion, because they're produced by underpaid and brutalized workers and then imported on extortionate and unfair terms.
so what, should we all give up bananas? no, and it's a sign of total lack of understanding of socialism as a global movement that all the pearl-clutching usamericans have latched onto the scary communists telling them to stop buying bananas. communism does not care about you as a consumer. individual consumptive choices are not a meaningful arena of political action. the socialist position is not "if there was a socialist reovlution in the usa, we would all stop eating bananas like good little boys", but rather, "if there's a socialist revolution in the countries where bananas are grown, then the availability of bananas in the usa is going to drop, and if you want to be an anti-imperialist in the imperial core you have to accept that".
(this is where the second argument i see about this, 'oh what are you catholic you want me to eat dirt like a monk?' reveals itself as a silly fucking solipsistic misunderstanding)
and again, let's note that the case of the banana can very easily be generalised out to coffee, chocolate, sugar, etc, and that it's not about individual consumptive habits, but about global economic systems. if you are donkey fucking kong and you eat 100 bananas a day i don't care and neither does anyone else. it's about trying to illustrate just one tiny mundane way in which economic imperialism makes the lives of people in the global north more convenient and simpler and so of course there is enormous pushback from people who attach moral value to this and therefore feel like the mean commies are personally calling them evil for eating a nutella or whatever which is frankly pretty tiring. Sad!
tldr: it is not imperialism when produce go on boat but it is imperialism when produce grown for dirt cheap by underpaid workers in a country with a devalued currency is then bought and exported and sold by usamerican companies creating huge amounts of economic value of which the nation in which the banana was grown, let alone the people who actually fucking grew it, don't see a cent -- and this is the engine behind the cheap, available-every-day-all-year-everywhere presence of bananas in the usa (and other places!)
remember when a trans guy shot up a school and for about a week every major news outlet in the usa was misgendering him to make it seem like he was a trans woman and then when people figured out he wasn’t every right wing media outlet dropped the story like it was a hot coal. utterly baffling nation we live in
Ever After — 1998 dir. Andy Tennant

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Tags via @redtailfins
Keep seeing random posts asking what China did different than India lol
They didn't have caste...no one mentioned this. They didn't have a caste system that restrict and punish large population of people from working in any field they desire like other normal countries.
the dryness setting on the dryer is so funny like wtf is damp dry. why would i want that. hmm yes i would like my panties pre-moistened please
i could have worded this better
Female shadow the hedgehog is the girl i want to be.
SHES EVERYTHING I WANNA BE
in the cambrian period the ocean was shallow and the sun never set. every day was sunday morning and there was never any dark. the world was a watery wonderland and air didnt exist yet. animals had just invented eating eachh other and it was really funny. having eyeballs was all the rage
its true ❤
what do you know ❤
the ocean was made of sprite also
theres been a lot of people on this post trying to correct basically every aspect of what ive said but nobody's confronted me on "everyday was sunday morning"
everybody agrees everyday was sunday morning

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
instead of the marjane satrapi quote you can use this one 😊
To: ... all the heroes of the masses who, martyred under torture, or facing murder squads, raised the red flag of their cause, ... all those dedicated revolutionaries, who died fighting the enemy of the people, and watered the tree of our people's liberating revolution, ... all the political prisoners whose resistance and fortitude strengthen the people's front, and to all those warriors of the masses, who have joined the path to people's liberation ... the path of revolution. Iran, my land, Look how the ugly hyenas plough clots of blood into your rich soil. Look how the clear water from your depths is sucked into the sewage that is imperialism. But Iran, my land, I vow, I vow to answer the silence of your night with the clamour of bullets; the darkness of your night with the flame of bullets; the cold of your night with the warmth of bullets. And I vow As long as there is one drop of blood in my veins, I will not let your flag fall, I will not let your people bow I will not let your enemies sleep.
Torture and Resistance in Iran - Ashraf Dehghani, 1970
The whole "Key to Heaven" concept that Satrapi talked about in her memoir is probably the most disgusting piece of propaganda that was co-opted West, because I know a bunch of Iranian Shi'as, some of whom are veterans of the Iraqi-Iran war, and none of them have ever heard of it.
The Key to Heaven was a myth where Iranian child soldiers were wearing a key around their neck, so that, in their supposed martyrdom while fighting the Iraqis, the keys would grant them access to heaven.
Not only is this a myth, but it has no religious basis.
She's really disgusting for that. Idc what Iranian govt did to her and her family at this point.
why are you 'socialists' posting that dumb marjane satrapi petty bougie internationalism quote. idc if she died that's no excuse to post iranian gusano's liberal bullshit.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
the last tumblr blog has died in captivity