What's all the more fascinating is how it removes traditional concepts of gender from the equation—at least on paper, while still ultimately failing to entirely escape those roots—yet still just reinvents and remixes so much.
Among the original seven Lyctors, there were four men and three women; among the disciple necromancers, four of each. If we account for the stong implications that Pyrrha was originally the necromancer, it may have once been five women and three men, even, which is incidentally the same spread as John's original inner circle pre-Resurrection. (And he's always been more comfortable with women. Barbie is the best but Ken is a creep. Mercy can scream constantly but Augustine raises his voice one (1) time and immediately apologizes.) AND YET.
Most of the original cavaliers are also women. And okay, "maybe" the whole group "just" had more women total. Except women are allowed to die for both women and men, and Alfred is allowed to die for Augustine, but the only instance where a man would have sacrificed himself for a woman back then is stopped. John does still kill Samael and save/spare Anastasia, but there's still something to be said there. And man that angle gets so much worse if Pyrrha was originally the necromancer...
Fast forward to the modern day and numbers are more spread out. The traits associated with each role are mix-and-matched. Necromancers are the ones seen as frail and in need of protection, cavs as strong stalwart protectors, etc. Yet there's still a lot of old bullshit. A lot of subtle assumptions toward women. High standards and critical judgment toward the performance of certain kinds of feminity. And then, while women are no longer required to conform to that feminine mold, they can be hella butch or androgynous and no one bats an eye, and gender is something people can freely choose or change ... IF you're choosing to be a man you'd better not be even slightly feminine in any way. Traditional rigid standards of masculinity are upheld there.
And the best example of all the nuance Muir puts into this through all that is in Naberius Tern. The only cavalier in history who was in no way willing about becoming a Lyctor's battery; Cristabel and Alfred and Gideon Nav all forced their necros, and the other disciples resigned themselves to it. (Possibly Pyrrha as one other exception but I'm sure we'll find out if so.) But Naberius was just property, a tool to be used.
He's someone who worked very hard to achieve the image of A Perfect Cavalier. (According to Ianthe, he had to be perfect, so he became perfect.) Perfect swordsmanship, perfectly sculpted body (which Gideon sees as "whipped within an inch of its life"), perfectly sculpted hair. And then Gideon turns around and judges how much effort he's putting into presentation, looks derisively at him using lip balm.
And Corona constantly dismisses him with things like "Go fix your hair," "You're getting hangry," even "The Third showed its stuff, Babs, that's all I care about." She basically goes "oh sweetie, the thing you've spent your whole life forced to perfect is just a silly little game, it's not important" and dismisses him being upset about it. Later, when she's upset and he's the one trying to get her to settle down, she uses him as a literal chew toy and he just submits to it. He quietly submits when Ianthe eats bits to fuel her necromancy, too.
He's the most glaring victim we directly see of the Misogyny 2.0 present in necro-cav dynamics, and it's really driven home by his nickname. Babs is such a stretch from Naberius, but irl it's usually short for Barbara. As in Barbie. Because they treat him more like a doll than a person.
And I think it's really interesting and important that Muir chose to put that narrative role on a snobby annoying man who you would absolutely want to punch in real life. Because the context changes everything. The twins insulting him isn't taking him down a peg, it's 'putting him in his place' and unambiguously punching down.
It removes the direct connection to gender (without entirely removing traditional sexism elsewhere, in the classic Muir move of having her cake and eating it too) to force the audience to stop and ask WHY these behaviors are bad, if they'd ever be acceptable from anyone toward anyone (no). It emphasizes that the problem isn't who's on top of the hierarchy, but having such hierarchies at all. The OG Lyctors display the roots this came from while Babs' everything expands it even more.
At the Oxford event, she encouraged readers to think about what we consider misogyny versus what the characters do, and I feel like this shift in context is a big part of that. John's genuinely tried and done well in some ways, and in others he's fucked it up beyond comprehension. Failing to understand that changing the parameters doesn't make it any less the exact same bullshit feels like a huge part of everything, here and in so many other ways he's just reinvented old shitty systems.
... 😭 But then, the whole marriage angle also absolutely sets up for stuff like this post, courtesy of @elevenbenevolentmammoths
Like, GOD, lmao... Every detail in these books really is doing SO MUCH at once and absolutely everything is connected to everything and it's still somehow often hilarious about it. Absolutely masterful always.