Day 98: What did you learn at NICAR, Jenna?
I saw really wonderful panels and had to miss some, too, because you can only be in one place at a time. Alas.
Here are a few tools that sounded useful or that I need to look into:
Censusreporter.org: Helps you create files that are ready to map. Can work with Google Fusion Tables.
QGIS - Free mapping softwareÂ
TileMill - Software that makes some seriously fancy maps and lets you customize with a CSS like language. Free for up to 3,000 PVS a month, but than $5 a month for up to 10,000 pageviews and the plans go up from there.
Leaflet.js - A Javascript library that TileMill is made from. I should see if I could use it by its lonesome.
D3.js - Reinforced that this Javascript library is useful for graphics and maps, but not always the best for mobile.
SQL - Great for building databases. I'll probably continue with Zed Shaw's Learn SQL the Hard Way.
And here are highights from a few of the many panels I went to:
I went to a few sessions on mapping, which gave a lot of best practices and software/programming options. The Wall Street Journal's Tom McGinty explained how he used a map to show how many people were within a mile of fracked oil wells. This technique could be applied to a wide range of stories and topics.
In a census reporting mapping session led by WNYC's John Keefe he showed different tools for mapping (Fusion Tables, Tile Mill, CensusReporter.org) and how to pull take census data and create shapefiles for mapping.
In another map panel with WNYC's Noah Veltman and MapBox's Tom MacWright, they said to to avoid colors that impact color blind readers; to not put too much on a map or you overwhelm readers (one panelist said you will âbreak peopleâs mindsâ); to make sure the map works on mobile; to remember to zoom in to the area thatâs important; and to enlist critical colleague who will be honest when the map just isnât working.Â
I really loved the lightening talks. Two of the data viz ones were especially fun:
How to use small graphics and charts to tell a digital
How data visualization can go very wrong
Takeaways from the worst of data viz talk were to avoid confusion and too much information; to make sure to fact check and copy edit graphics; and to watch your scale.
Some of the very specific panels that seemed irrelevant to my beat turned out to be very informative and broadly applicable. The inspections session by Michael Pell of Reuters and Joce Sterman of ABC2 pointed out how intrinsic inspections are to everyday life. There's a paper trail (or more likely, a database trail) associated with all of those inspections, too.
In the "Proper Workflows for Data Projects" session panelists said to automate and show your work whenever possible to avoid mistakes on digital and data projects. They also said to make sure you have the same review process for web projects (with a copy editor looking at the text) as you do regular stories. Brian Boyer of NPR, Ben Welsh of the LA Times, John Perry of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and Kevin Schaul of the Star Tribune participated in that panel.Â
Speaking of automating, the Twitter bot session was a lot of fun. I hadn't realized how much opportunity there is for these bots in news reporting. A serious Chicago Trib âbotâ was programmed to scrape some information of a website to inform readers of who is donating large amounts of money to politicians and when.