Zanderian Physics

Measurement and Structure.

The first three classical dimensions are useful for measuring things. People can use them to measure objects and spaces in their environments. However, this measurement utility gets sidestepped when people then use the dimensions to describe their environment and experiences. The concept of dimensions shift from angles of measurement and observation to being limits on their concept of functional reality.

This is most keenly felt with our modern perceptions of the classical 4th dimension, time. When discussing time, we suddenly change from measurements to a full blown existential crisis. People make claims that you can't see time or travel through it, even though we constantly predict, react, and remember. The Sun does not stop rising if we look away.

We must remember that the dimensions were decided, not discovered.

To resolve this conflation between measurement and structure, in the Zandarian Hypotheses we differentiate between Metric Dimensions and Structural Dimensions. The ordering and determination of these follow similar rules.

Metric Dimensions must be ordered by expanding along a perpendicular angle and must be useful for measuring objects and spaces.

Structural Dimensions must be ordered by expanding from a set of consistent aspects of existence requisite for each higher structure.

For example, if we consider life to be an aspect of existence that requires thought, then thought must exist structurally as being prerequisite of life. Then we must define the simplest form of thought, such as decision, or yes-no determinations. These yes-no determinations could then be observed in something like a crystal. Each chemical compound including or rejecting nearby compounds to form the crystalline structure. Now we can define crystals as deciding, thinking, living. Structurally speaking.

Of importance in Zandarian Hypotheses: Gravity is the force of the absolute void returning to its natural state of absolute stillness before existence.

In the application of Zandarian Dimensions, we have decided the following:

Structural Dimensions:

0SD Balance. Nothing existing balanced against nothing not existing, as there is nothing to not exist.

1SD Time. Absolute time. All of existence is events. How can existence occur without first having the time in which to exist?

2SD Energy. Waves of time, future and past polarity never able to be coplanar.

3SD Space. Zones within which energy may propagate and expand. Composed of energy.

4SD Fields. Commonalities of frequencies formed by energy interacting within space. Field theory.

5SD Excitations. Constructive and destructive interference patterns within the fields. Quantum theory.

6SD Events. First a single moment of two Excitations coexisting, then motion from the resulting gravitational pull. Big Bang theory. Particle theory.

7SD Soul. The resonance of events echoing throughout existence. Concept of solitude. Devil.

8SD Spirit. The interaction of events following a pattern of repetition through a resonant zone. Multiverse theory.

9SD Mind. Decisions, thoughts, yes-no determinations following an acceptance or rejection, harmony with or deviation from the spirit. Crystals, viruses, compounds. Universe, being different from the Multiverse.

10SD Community. Complex life, cells, organisms, decision matrices coinciding, remembering, predicting, cooperating.

11SD Society. Communities interacting, life forms recognizing others. Mountains, rivers, oceans, continents.

12SD Planet. The collective existence of a planetary zone, capable of all capabilities of lower structural forms.

13SD Cosmic Web. The interaction between cosmic entities.

14SD Tree of Life. The structured form of life-bearing planets and other cosmic entities. Multiple trees of life may exist throughout the Omniverse. Connections based on familiarity and similarity of functions. Cymatics.

15SD Masters. Singularities of capabilities of lower structural forms. Observation, understanding, decisions, influence, etc. Angelic Thrones.

16SD Totality. Judgement, a collective of all existence. Frame of reference from which judgement may exist, containing all truth from the Omniverse including each Universe of the Multiverse. Clear view of the soul of one universe acting as the spirit of the next and all of the results thereof.

Metric Dimensions:

1MD Length. Simplex line.

2MD Width. Simplex triangle.

3MD Depth. Simplex pyramid.

4MD Rotation. Simplex cone.

5MD Flip. Simplex sphere.

6MD Pivot. Simplex orb of potential position.

7MD Momentum. Simplex orb of potential expression on tangent points of impact.

8MD Velocity. Simplex straight path through empty zone.

9MD Collision. Simplex instance of impact with mirrored identity.

10MD Interaction. Simplex every possible instance of impact with non-identities.

11MD Actualization. Simplex every possible path of every possible instance of interaction.

12MD Snap. Simplex snapshot of actualization.

Are you INSAAANE?!

Actually, how can you tell?

Well, it depends on how you define sanity.

During the 20 years while we had a slowly worsening disease that randomly wiped our memories every few hours, we experienced a phenomenon called ego death about 100,000 times and as we began to realize that our memories and personalities were inconsistent day to day, we began to have serious doubts about our own sanity. And so we developed, and redeveloped and redeveloped and redeveloped our own model for analyzing our sanity.

We'll put a full video on YouTube soon.

It's a value based model for sanity and it's basically this, I am alive therefore I value life, therefore I value longevity, therefore I value health, therefore I value comfort, therefore I value dignity, therefore I value happiness. I am alive and so I want you to be happy. And remember,

I am alive therefore I value life,

therefore I value longevity,

therefore I value health,

therefore I value comfort,

therefore I value dignity,

therefore I value happiness.

I am alive and so I want you to be happy.

This is our model for sanity.

We include this model in the Zandarian Lexicon, a set of definitions and concepts that we are developing for perceiving and communicating ideas about existence in a more clear, consistent, and complete way. We want to bridge communcation gaps between sciences, spirituality, and philosophy.

On that note, the reason we reject the classical model for insanity, "To repeat an action and expect a different result" is because the universe is continually changing and no two actions could ever be identitcal. If you repeat the same action as the environment around changes, the outcome of that action could very well be different. Keep in mind, that the people around you are a part of that environment. And so if someone witnesses you repeating an action and decides to either help or hinder your actions, then the result will certainly change.

In fact, if we apply this concept to a community environment, it would be far less logical for the repeated action to always yeild the same result. So, we reject that definition for insanity. Additionally, the DSM5 and other modern mental health knowledge sources, are all primarily focused on corporate productivity and conformity with capitalism as a basis for typicallity. This is paradoxical in a way that we will have to make a whole other video to properly explore. For now, instead of either of those models, we will present a model focused on the functionality of continued life as a basis for sanity of living beings.

Now, if a living being devalues life, the only way to demonstrate that value in earnest would be to end their own life. But this doesn't happen. Which means, if a living being disrepects life, it is a form of dissociation between their own experience and how they perceive the experinces of others. In other words, they fail to recognize that they are a part of the interconnected web of life. They fail to recognize that other lives, other's pain and suffering, are real. And so they experience no connection, no social responsibiltiy to respect the lives of others.

If this mindset were adopted by every living being, life would immediately cease to exist. That's because to devalue life while living a life is a paradoxical philosophy. Paradoxes collapse when applied to reality, they can only exist in imagination and concept. When that paradoxical imagination then influences a living mind to make choices, we observe the collapse of that life form and the eventual extinction of those who hold on to the paradox as it collapses.

This is how we define paradoxical philosophies and insanity at the base level. Next, we will provide a more in-depth model with 6 essential stages of defining and analyzing sane thought for yourself and your evironment.

For the purpose of this model: Value is what you do for yourself. Respect is what you do for others.

LIFE

I value life not as a choice but as an observation. Story time: While we were losing memories every few hours, there was one thing that we noticed every time, We're still alive despite having the capability to be otherwise. This is what led us to this model in the first place.

To value life is to choose to survive. To respect life is to choose to allow others to survive. To fail to respect or value life is to experience an insane thought.

LONGEVITY

This goes hand in hand with life. If I value something then I want to retain it and not lose it. With long life comes more stories, more wisdom, more connections, more to share and more opportunities to create something new.

To value longevity is to choose to continue living until the world makes you stop. To respect longevity is to choose to allow those around you to continue living until they pass away naturally. To fail to respect or value longevity is to experience an insane thought.

HEALTH

The next logical essential value is Health. Whithout a healthy mind, body, and community, longevity is directly diminished.

To value health is to choose actions that support your health and long life whenever those actions are available. To respect health is to choose to cultivate and support an environment wherein actions that support the health and long life of those around you are available and easy to choose. To fail to respect or value health is to experience an insane thought.

COMFORT

After Health comes comfort. If you are in pain or discomfort, it is an indicator of a negative impact on health. This applies to physical comfort as well as emotional, mental, and social comfort.

To value comfort is to choose to find and cultivate an environment where pain, anxiety, and threats to your well being are minimized. To respect comfort is to choose to cultivate an environment where pain, anxiety, and threats to the well being of others are easily avoidable and clearly observable if present.

DIGNITY

Next, to support comfort, one of the most important factors is dignity. Now, diginty is a bit of a vague term in modern common language, so we will provide a bit more detail for our definitions. When we talk about dignity, we focus on the concept of self-determination. In other words, the freedom and ability to determine what one does with their own time, with their own mind, with their own energy, and with their own body. This does not include the freedom of one to inflict harm or enforce their will onto another. It also does not include lying. In short, valuing dignity does not involve disrespecting the dignity of others.

Because this has been a difficult concept for individuals we have encountered and observed, we will provide an example in this video instead of the next one. The freedom of speech does not guarantee an audience. Having the right of free expression is not the same as having the right to force people to listen to you or watch you. An individual being removed from a platform is not censorship. The commnunity provides the platform and the community can take the platform away. Censorship is when a topic, artwork, or concept is removed from public observation by an authority and denied from being observed. Wrongful censorship does happen but it is not the same as being denied an audience. Being denied an audience is not a disrepect to your dignity. A lack of acceptance from others does not diminish your self-determination. On the contrary, Forcing others to listen to you or to follow your commands is a disrepect to their self-determination of time, mind, energy, and body.

To value to dignity is to choose to spend your time and energy acting on your own wisdom, knowledge, values, and experiences over the influences and opinions expressed by others. To respect dignity is to choose to allow others to determine what they do with their own time, mind, energy, and body. To fail to respect or value dignity is to experience an insane thought.

HAPPINESS

Finally, happiness. In short, while valuing and respecting the other stages, happiness is seeking and discovering things that bring joy and satisfaction.

To value happiness is to choose to seek your joy and satisfaction with life. To respect happiness is to choose to allow others to seek their joy and satisfaction with life. To fail to respect or value happiness is to experience an insane thought.

This concludes the basic Zandarian Model for Sanity.

Note that in each definition we presented,, we included the words "to choose". Remember that what happens automatically or habbitually in your brain is not a reflection of who you are as a person, but it is a reflection of the events you have lived through. It is what you choose that determines your functional impact on your life and the lives of those around you. With our model, you could be living with a mental disorder or a neural atypicality and still be perfectly sane. Value life while you're alive. Choose love over hate.

In this post we presented the Zandarian Model for Sanity as clearly and concisely as we could. In future posts, we will explore the 6 stages of sanity in more depth; with examples of application and personal experiences. We will also explore the concepts involved in analyzing severity of insanity and hate with regard to this model.

Are you INSAAANE?!

Actually, how can you tell?

Well, it depends on how you define sanity.

During the 20 years while we had a slowly worsening disease that randomly wiped our memories every few hours, we experienced a phenomenon called ego death about 100,000 times and as we began to realize that our memories and personalities were inconsistent day to day, we began to have serious doubts about our own sanity. And so we developed, and redeveloped and redeveloped and redeveloped our own model for analyzing our sanity.

We'll put a full video on YouTube soon.

It's a value based model for sanity and it's basically this, I am alive therefore I value life, therefore I value longevity, therefore I value health, therefore I value comfort, therefore I value dignity, therefore I value happiness. I am alive and so I want you to be happy. And remember,

I am alive therefore I value life,

therefore I value longevity,

therefore I value health,

therefore I value comfort,

therefore I value dignity,

therefore I value happiness.

I am alive and so I want you to be happy.

This is our model for sanity.

We include this model in the Zandarian Lexicon, a set of definitions and concepts that we are developing for perceiving and communicating ideas about existence in a more clear, consistent, and complete way. We want to bridge communcation gaps between sciences, spirituality, and philosophy.

On that note, the reason we reject the classical model for insanity, "To repeat an action and expect a different result" is because the universe is continually changing and no two actions could ever be identitcal. If you repeat the same action as the environment around changes, the outcome of that action could very well be different. Keep in mind, that the people around you are a part of that environment. And so if someone witnesses you repeating an action and decides to either help or hinder your actions, then the result will certainly change.

In fact, if we apply this concept to a community environment, it would be far less logical for the repeated action to always yeild the same result. So, we reject that definition for insanity. Additionally, the DSM5 and other modern mental health knowledge sources, are all primarily focused on corporate productivity and conformity with capitalism as a basis for typicallity. This is paradoxical in a way that we will have to make a whole other video to properly explore. For now, instead of either of those models, we will present a model focused on the functionality of continued life as a basis for sanity of living beings.

Now, if a living being devalues life, the only way to demonstrate that value in earnest would be to end their own life. But this doesn't happen. Which means, if a living being disrepects life, it is a form of dissociation between their own experience and how they perceive the experinces of others. In other words, they fail to recognize that they are a part of the interconnected web of life. They fail to recognize that other lives, other's pain and suffering, are real. And so they experience no connection, no social responsibiltiy to respect the lives of others.

If this mindset were adopted by every living being, life would immediately cease to exist. That's because to devalue life while living a life is a paradoxical philosophy. Paradoxes collapse when applied to reality, they can only exist in imagination and concept. When that paradoxical imagination then influences a living mind to make choices, we observe the collapse of that life form and the eventual extinction of those who hold on to the paradox as it collapses.

This is how we define paradoxical philosophies and insanity at the base level. Next, we will provide a more in-depth model with 6 essential stages of defining and analyzing sane thought for yourself and your evironment.

For the purpose of this model: Value is what you do for yourself. Respect is what you do for others.

LIFE

I value life not as a choice but as an observation. Story time: While we were losing memories every few hours, there was one thing that we noticed every time, We're still alive despite having the capability to be otherwise. This is what led us to this model in the first place.

To value life is to choose to survive. To respect life is to choose to allow others to survive. To fail to respect or value life is to experience an insane thought.

LONGEVITY

This goes hand in hand with life. If I value something then I want to retain it and not lose it. With long life comes more stories, more wisdom, more connections, more to share and more opportunities to create something new.

To value longevity is to choose to continue living until the world makes you stop. To respect longevity is to choose to allow those around you to continue living until they pass away naturally. To fail to respect or value longevity is to experience an insane thought.

HEALTH

The next logical essential value is Health. Whithout a healthy mind, body, and community, longevity is directly diminished.

To value health is to choose actions that support your health and long life whenever those actions are available. To respect health is to choose to cultivate and support an environment wherein actions that support the health and long life of those around you are available and easy to choose. To fail to respect or value health is to experience an insane thought.

COMFORT

After Health comes comfort. If you are in pain or discomfort, it is an indicator of a negative impact on health. This applies to physical comfort as well as emotional, mental, and social comfort.

To value comfort is to choose to find and cultivate an environment where pain, anxiety, and threats to your well being are minimized. To respect comfort is to choose to cultivate an environment where pain, anxiety, and threats to the well being of others are easily avoidable and clearly observable if present.

DIGNITY

Next, to support comfort, one of the most important factors is dignity. Now, diginty is a bit of a vague term in modern common language, so we will provide a bit more detail for our definitions. When we talk about dignity, we focus on the concept of self-determination. In other words, the freedom and ability to determine what one does with their own time, with their own mind, with their own energy, and with their own body. This does not include the freedom of one to inflict harm or enforce their will onto another. It also does not include lying. In short, valuing dignity does not involve disrespecting the dignity of others.

Because this has been a difficult concept for individuals we have encountered and observed, we will provide an example in this video instead of the next one. The freedom of speech does not guarantee an audience. Having the right of free expression is not the same as having the right to force people to listen to you or watch you. An individual being removed from a platform is not censorship. The commnunity provides the platform and the community can take the platform away. Censorship is when a topic, artwork, or concept is removed from public observation by an authority and denied from being observed. Wrongful censorship does happen but it is not the same as being denied an audience. Being denied an audience is not a disrepect to your dignity. A lack of acceptance from others does not diminish your self-determination. On the contrary, Forcing others to listen to you or to follow your commands is a disrepect to their self-determination of time, mind, energy, and body.

To value to dignity is to choose to spend your time and energy acting on your own wisdom, knowledge, values, and experiences over the influences and opinions expressed by others. To respect dignity is to choose to allow others to determine what they do with their own time, mind, energy, and body. To fail to respect or value dignity is to experience an insane thought.

HAPPINESS

Finally, happiness. In short, while valuing and respecting the other stages, happiness is seeking and discovering things that bring joy and satisfaction.

To value happiness is to choose to seek your joy and satisfaction with life. To respect happiness is to choose to allow others to seek their joy and satisfaction with life. To fail to respect or value happiness is to experience an insane thought.

This concludes the basic Zandarian Model for Sanity.

Note that in each definition we presented,, we included the words "to choose". Remember that what happens automatically or habbitually in your brain is not a reflection of who you are as a person, but it is a reflection of the events you have lived through. It is what you choose that determines your functional impact on your life and the lives of those around you. With our model, you could be living with a mental disorder or a neural atypicality and still be perfectly sane. Value life while you're alive. Choose love over hate.

In this post we presented the Zandarian Model for Sanity as clearly and concisely as we could. In future posts, we will explore the 6 stages of sanity in more depth; with examples of application and personal experiences. We will also explore the concepts involved in analyzing severity of insanity and hate with regard to this model.

Zandarian Lexicon entry

A dimension is an angle by which to observe. These observations can be measurements, structure, or anything else, to include subjective matters.

What a dimension is not, is a zone. A certain zone can be measured by many dimensions. A certain zone can be structured in many dimensions. However, a zone is not a dimension.

This is to clarify and communicate the idea that nobody, nothing, no concept can be "from a dimension". Something can be structurally 12 dimensional. Something can't be "from the 12th dimension."

If any of our posts goes viral and gains popularity, we hope desperately that it is this one. This misconception is so deeply rooted in science fiction as well as science that it is causing serious harm to humanity's ability to perceive and understand our existing environment. It has stunted our advancement of conceptualizing and understanding higher dimensions.

It brings us physical pain to contemplate the popularity of the phrase. Most recently in our personal experience in Spiderman: Into the Spiderverse. "I'm from another dimension. Another, another dimension." This line is such a destructive usage of human language centers that it hurts to hear, it hurts to consider that someone had to write it and that someone had to read it.

Dimensions are not zones.

Dimensions are not zones.

"I'm from another Verse" makes the most sense. Like verses in the same song. Having the term "Universe" being the collective unification of the "Multiverse" would be logical. But universe is already ingrained into the language to mean a single of the multiplicity of the Multiverse. Furthermore, multiverse and Omniverse can be used for larger scales, which alleviates the need for technical rebranding for clarification and accuracy.