wallacepolsom
DEAR READER

Product Placement
sheepfilms

Kaledo Art

izzy's playlists!
we're not kids anymore.
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

★
Cosimo Galluzzi

@theartofmadeline

Andulka
Cosmic Funnies
Claire Keane
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
NASA
Three Goblin Art
Show & Tell

Origami Around

seen from Ukraine
seen from Singapore

seen from Malaysia
seen from Poland

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Denmark

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Germany
seen from South Korea
seen from United States
@xtruss

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Silence Or Surrender: The 27th Amendment And The Unmaking of Justice
As The 27th Constitutional Amendment Threatens To Erode Judicial Independence, Pakistan’s Judiciary Faces a Defining Choice — To Reclaim Its Conscience or Surrender It To Power.
— Waqas Ahmad | November 8, 2025 | Dawn Newspaper
Centuries after John Adams spoke these words, their resonance feels almost prophetic today, as the government tables the 27th Constitutional Amendment. For those who have witnessed the slow, deliberate erosion of judicial independence in Pakistan, this moment feels less like reform and more like resignation.
The judiciary, already weakened and weary after the 26th Amendment, now stands on the precipice of collapse. What is being framed as an administrative restructuring — the creation of a separate constitutional court — in truth, threatens to hollow out the very authority of an institution that has long stood as the final line of defence between power and the people.
It is not merely an amendment to a document; it is an assault on the idea that justice must stand apart from politics. The judiciary is not an accessory to government; it is the conscience of the nation. When that conscience begins to fade, when its voice trembles under pressure, the entire structure of liberty begins to shake.
The Fire We’ve Forgotten
I remember vividly why I, and so many of my generation, chose this path. We are the first-generation lawyers — young once, idealistic, and uncertain about the future — but we came into this profession not for wealth or prestige, not to wear robes or titles. We were drawn to the law because we had seen something extraordinary: the courage of those who stood in the streets during the movement of 2009. The lawyers, judges, and ordinary citizens who rose to defend the Constitution then did so not for themselves but for a belief — a belief that justice must forever remain beyond the reach of politics and power.
That movement was not about personalities; it was about a principle. It restored a dignity that had been stripped away from our courts and reminded a nation that justice could still prevail when conscience awakened. The videos still available on YouTube show us those days — the chants, the tear gas, the arrests, the sheer defiance etched on every face. People carried nothing but the Constitution in their hands, yet it was enough to move mountains. The law, in that moment, stood taller than fear.
It was a time when truth walked unarmed, and yet, it conquered.
Today, that same spirit feels painfully distant. The silence of those entrusted with defending the judiciary now hangs heavy over every courtroom and every lawyer’s heart. We had placed our hopes in the judges — believing they would guard the independence of the bench, believing that when the moment came, they would remember the blood and courage that restored this institution. And yet, their silence has become deafening. It is not neutrality — it is surrender. It is the quiet undoing of everything that was once fought for.
“The Judiciary Must Be Independent of Every Other Power; Otherwise, There Is No Liberty, No Security, No Justice.” — John Adams
Our silence in this defining moment will be a grave injustice and a treason with the blood of those who shed theirs in the 2009 movement. It will be a betrayal of their courage, their conviction, and their sacrifice. Those who once stood for justice, who faced batons, tear gas, and imprisonment, did not suffer so that we could fall silent today. To remain unmoved now is to desecrate the memory of that struggle and the spirit that once lifted this nation. Silence in this hour is not just inaction — it is complicity. It is the surrender of the very ideals we once promised to protect.
But this is not the end. Not yet. There is still time to reclaim what was won with such sacrifice. There is still time for courage, humility, and reflection. We owe it to those who stood before us, and to those who will come after us, to raise our voices once more — to remind those in power that the judiciary does not belong to them. It belongs to the people, to the Constitution, and to every citizen who still believes in fairness and truth.
History does not forget such moments. No political party will be remembered for the amendments it passed or the power it grasped. But history will remember the silence — or the courage — of those who were entrusted with justice and chose how to respond in this hour of testing. The question is not whether power will prevail (it always tries to). The question is whether conscience will resist, whether courage will still find a voice when silence feels safer.
The Author is a Lawyer Based in Islamabad, Pakistan.
This Is The Hour of Conscience
The choice before us could not be clearer. Either we allow this moment to pass in quiet resignation, or we rise, as those before us did, to defend the sanctity of justice. The judiciary’s independence is not a ceremonial value; it is the living heart of democracy. When it falters, the people lose their last defence against tyranny. Every lawyer, every judge, and every citizen must understand — the fight for judicial independence is not a fight for the judiciary alone; it is a fight for the soul of constitution and country itself.
To stand up now is not to be reckless; it is to be responsible. It is to remind ourselves that independence of judiciary is not merely a clause in a Constitution — it is the beating heart of a free people. When the judiciary trembles, the nation’s conscience shakes with it. When we remain silent, we allow that tremor to grow into collapse. The independence of the judiciary was never gifted; it was earned — with struggle, with resilience, and with blood. And it will survive only if we defend it with the same fire that once lit our streets.
Because at the end of all laws and amendments, it is not power that endures — it is principle. Power fades, regimes fall, but the courage to defend justice, even when it costs you everything, becomes eternal. The history of this nation will not be written by those who silenced dissent, but by those who dared to speak when silence was safer.
As Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. reminded us, “In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.”

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
June's New Moon will make the Milky Way Core's Bright Stars more easily visible, especially in areas with Little to No Light Pollution. Alan Dyer/Visual & Written/VW Pics, Superstock

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Feds Failing In Bid To Take A Supercomputer From A Climate Research Center
The National Center For Atmospheric Research Won’t Be Losing Its Supercomputer.
— John Timmer | June 2, 2026
The Nationa Center For Atmospheric Research Mesa Lab is seen in Boulder, Colorado, on July 7, 2025. Credit: Matthew Jonas/MediaNews Group/Boulder Daily Camera via Getty Images
In December, the Trump Administration abruptly announced it would shut down the National Center For Atmospheric Research (NCAR), a Boulder, Colorado-based facility that helps researchers perform studies of weather, climate, atmospheric chemistry, and more. The news came as a shock, given that the government had never identified serious deficiencies in the management of NCAR and its associated supercomputing center in Wyoming.
Nevertheless, the government ordered the University Consortium For Atmospheric Research (UCAR), which manages NCAR on behalf of the National Science Foundation, to help it prepare to transfer the Wyoming Facility to a different operator. UCAR Sued the Government and, on Monday, won a preliminary injunction that places the transfer of the facility on hold.
Is That Your Final Decision?
NCAR is what is termed a “Federally-Funded Research and Development Center” meant to support researchers in the academic community. Rather than having its own research agenda, it provides facilities, equipment, and expertise to support projects that are too large or complex for researchers to pursue on their own. NCAR has been around since the early 1960s and has become a critical resource for the global atmospheric science community.
So, it was a shock for many that the government would attempt to shut it down and distribute the resources it maintains, such as research aircraft and the supercomputing center. The government solicited public feedback on that decision, but UCAR took no chances and sued. As part of that suit, UCAR sought a preliminary injunction that would put the transfer of its supercomputing center on hold.
To get that injunction, UCAR would have to show that it was likely to prevail and that it would experience irreparable harm if the court didn’t intervene.
The Judge in this case, Brooke Jackson, ruled that the issue was one his court could address based on the Administrative Procedures Act. The government had argued that no decision had been made, and therefore that there were no grounds for the suit. But Jackson noted that as early as February—before the public comment period on the decision had even closed—government officials were telling UCAR that “[the National Science Foundation] has decided to transfer stewardship” of the supercomputing center.
By early March, a government program director was telling UCAR that he needed to “Get This Done Quickly” and that documentation of the supercomputing center needed to be handed over “Yesterday.” Even now, months after the deadline for public feedback on the decision, the government admits it hasn’t fully evaluated the comments it received. “The sequence of events strongly suggests that the outcome was predetermined,” the decision notes.
For all of those reasons, he concluded that the NSF had already reached a final decision on the transfer of the supercomputing center, and that decision was subject to review under the Administrative Procedures Act, which is what the rest of the case hinged on.
Blocked
As in so many other cases that have made their way into the courts, the government does not seem to have been prepared to offer much of a defense of its actions. The Administrative Procedures Act prohibits actions that are “Arbitrary and Capricious,” and Jackson found that there was a “failure to articulate any rationale” for the decision to relieve UCAR of its management role.
He noted that some internal documents introduced as evidence indicated that there was dissatisfaction with NCAR’s pursuit of climate research and hosting of scientific programs intended to improve minority participation. But the government chose not to use those as arguments, so the court didn’t need to evaluate them. UCAR, in contrast, introduced significant evidence that the decision to harm NCAR was part of a range of measures meant to pressure Colorado’s Democratic Governor about an unrelated matter.
Given that, the court concluded that forcing UCAR to give up its supercomputing center was arbitrary and capricious, and thus violated the Administrative Procedures Act.
UCAR was also able to demonstrate that it was suffering irreparable harm due to the uncertainty about its future. It has experienced unusually high levels of attrition among its staff, who have a rare set of technical skills and require additional training after hiring. And it expects it will be difficult to find replacements for them.
Given those circumstances, Jackson has issued an injunction blocking the government from forcing NCAR or UCAR to give up any resources related to the supercomputing center.
There are still additional threats to NCAR, including breaking it up, transferring other resources, and even selling its Boulder headquarters. So, this victory is far from the end of the threats. But the legal issues that decided the case are likely to apply to the additional threats, unless the government has a defense that it simply chose not to present here.
— John Timmer is Ars Technica's Science Editor. He has a Bachelor of Arts in Biochemistry from Columbia University, and a Ph.D. in Molecular and Cell Biology from the University of California, Berkeley.
Some existed even before the country did.
Stalin’s Secret Wine Cellar of 40,000 Bottles Unsealed For First Time
Some of The Bottles Date Back To The Early 1800s And Once Belonged To Tsar Alexander III
— Lucy Papachristou | Friday 29 May 2026
Georgia's Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze attends the opening ceremony of a wine cellar housing a collection of rarities from the 19th and 20th centuries, once owned by Soviet leader Joseph Stalin (Reuters)
Deep within a vault, where tangled cobwebs cling to the ceiling and a musky sweetness hangs in the air, a remarkable wine collection once owned by Josef Stalin has been unsealed for the first time this week.
The Georgian government, now the custodian of this extraordinary repository in Tbilisi, plans to auction off the roughly 40,000 French and Georgian rarities.
Some bottles in the collection date back to the early 19th century.
Proceeds from the sale are earmarked to establish a new wine education school in Georgia.
Irakli Gilauri, owner of Gilauri Wines, who collaborated with the country's agriculture ministry on the initiative, said that the auction would help to "put Georgia on the collectors' map".
The South Caucasus country sells itself as the birthplace of wine, with archaeological evidence demonstrating a continuous wine-making tradition stretching back 8,000 years.
Some of the bottles were once owned by Tsar Nicholas (Reuters)
Mr Stalin was born to a poor Georgian family in Gori, a city in the country’s east.
He went on to join the Marxist Russian Social Democratic Labour Party and assumed the leadership after Vladimir Lenin’s death in 1924.
Mr Stalin then led the Soviet Union for more than 30 years, until his death in 1953.
He was an enthusiastic wine drinker and collector and his trove includes wine from Bordeaux's most famous estates that were once owned by Russia's Tsar Alexander III and his son Nicholas II.
There are 40,000 bottles in the cellar (Reuters)
The Soviets seized the Imperial Romanov collection after the 1917 Russian Revolution, and Mr Stalin became its guardian, slowly adding his favourite Georgian varieties.
Peering into the dust-covered bottles at the amber liquid inside, collector Victor Chen, who travelled to Tbilisi from Dallas, Texas, was excited by what he saw.
"I feel like you're Indiana Jones opening up a cave: it could be nothing, it could be something," he said, referring to the fictional swashbuckling archaeologist from the film franchise.
"There's not many things that are still historical moments at this point. And this could be one of them."

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
The Overtoun Bridge In Scotland Has Seen Hundreds of Dogs Leap From The Same Parapet Since the 1950s, Often On Clear Days From The Right Side, And One Behavioural Investigation Pointed To The Scent of Mink Below
The Overtoun Bridge Sits Above Overtoun Burn In Milton, Near Dumbarton, A Victorian Arched Span of Red Sandstone Reached By A Tree-Lined Drive That Ends At A Small Baronial House.
— By Space Daily Editorial Team · Editorial Process | May 30, 2026
The Overtoun Bridge sits above Overtoun Burn in Milton, near Dumbarton, a Victorian arched span of red sandstone reached by a tree-lined drive that ends at a small baronial house. It is a handsome structure, built for a grand approach. It is also a place where, over several decades, hundreds of dogs have leapt from the same few feet of parapet onto the rocks below.
The leaps almost always happen on clear, dry days. Almost always from the last stones of the right-hand side as you walk away from Overtoun House. Almost always by long-nosed breeds, the collies, labradors, retrievers and spaniels whose olfactory machinery is built for following a thread of scent through a hedge.
For a long time, nobody could say why.
A Bridge With A Body Count
The parapet is solid stone, waist-high on a person, and from the footpath a dog cannot see over it. To a dog walking across, the bridge feels like a corridor with high walls.
What the dog can do, and the human cannot, is smell what is happening below.
Local accounts of dogs jumping go back decades. The story attracted serious attention in the early 2000s when residents and the Scottish SPCA began counting incidents. Estimates vary, but the running tally repeated in Scottish press coverage and in interviews with locals includes hundreds of jumps, with dozens of fatalities, the rest surviving the fall onto the rocks and shallow water below.
Survivors sometimes climb back up and try to jump again. That detail, more than anything else, is what convinced investigators that something specific was pulling the animals over.
Enter David Sands
The Scottish SPCA commissioned David Sands, an animal behaviourist, to work out what was happening. Sands started by ruling things out. He looked at the ghost stories, the suggestion that Overtoun House and its grounds were haunted, and set them aside. He looked at the idea, popular in tabloid coverage, that the dogs were depressed or suicidal, and set that aside too. Dogs do not form the abstract intention to end their lives. The assumption that they might is a projection, the kind of humanising reflex that turns an animal’s behaviour into a human narrative.
He looked at the bridge instead. The weather on the days when jumps occurred. The breeds involved. The exact spot on the parapet. The conditions underneath.
The Pattern In The Data
The clustering was striking. Jumps happened on dry, clear days. They happened almost exclusively from the right side of the bridge looking away from the house, within the last two parapet stones before the end of the span. And they overwhelmingly involved long-snouted breeds with the densest olfactory hardware.
Dogs experience the world primarily through smell. They have around 300 million olfactory receptors compared with roughly six million in humans, and a dedicated vomeronasal organ for parsing the chemistry of other animals. As one recent review put it, scent is how dogs largely experience the world, the way humans rely on sight. Trained scent dogs can pick up target odours from impressive distances, in some controlled tests more than a kilometre away.
So Sands went looking for what, exactly, was being smelled.
The Mink In The Stones
Underneath the right-hand end of the parapet, in the dense vegetation and rock crevices that drop down toward Overtoun Burn, Sands and his team found evidence of small mammals living in the structure. Mice. Squirrels. And American mink, an introduced species that had spread across Scottish waterways.
Mink produce a strong, musky anal secretion used for territorial marking. It is one of the most pungent scents in the British mammalian fauna, instantly interesting to a predator-descended nose.
Sands ran a test with a group of dogs, presenting them with three scents: mink, squirrel and mouse. The majority went straight to the mink and showed strong investigative behaviour. The other two drew much weaker responses.
Combine that with the geometry of the bridge. A long-nosed dog walking across on a dry day catches a thread of mink scent rising up the stonework. The parapet blocks visual information. The dog cannot see that there is a drop on the other side. It can only smell that something extremely interesting is right there, just over the wall. It jumps the way it would jump a garden fence to chase a rabbit.
The breed bias fits. Brachycephalic breeds, the pugs and bulldogs with compressed snouts, have a fraction of the scent-receptor surface area of a collie or a labrador and are less likely to register a faint mammalian musk drifting up from a crevice. Across the wider animal kingdom, scent sensitivity varies enormously by anatomy, and biologists have long debated which species sits at the top of the olfactory league table. The weather bias fits the chemistry. Volatile compounds disperse in dry, still air; rain scrubs them out. On a wet Scottish afternoon, the mink scent never makes it up to nose height. On a dry one, it climbs the sandstone like smoke up a chimney.
What The Jumping Actually Looks Like
Owners who have witnessed it describe the same sequence. The dog is walking normally, often off the lead. It reaches the end of the bridge. Its body language changes, the tail goes up, the head lifts, the nose works. It moves toward the parapet with sudden intent. It does not hesitate at the wall. It scales the stones in a single motion and is gone.
The behaviour is not despair. It is the same focused, almost trance-like pursuit a dog shows when it locks onto a squirrel in a tree. Olfactory cues can trigger powerful approach behaviours in dogs, overriding caution about terrain that the animal has not actually surveyed. The bridge weaponises that override.
The Other Complication
Sands has been careful not to claim mink scent explains every single incident. Some of the dogs involved over the decades may have fallen rather than jumped, chasing real prey across the parapet edge. Some accounts have been retold and inflated. Counting dog jumps from a Victorian bridge is not a tidy dataset.
Researchers who work on animal behaviour have spent the last two decades trying to tighten methods against observer bias, recognising how easily a vivid hypothesis shapes the interpretation of what an animal is doing. The Overtoun investigation lives in that tension. The scent explanation is the strongest one available, supported by the breed pattern, the weather pattern, the location pattern, and the presence of mink in the structure. It is not a controlled experiment.
What Still Happens At The Bridge
After the Sands report, signs were put up at both ends of the bridge warning owners to keep dogs on leads. The signs are still there, weathered, in plain English.
They have not closed the case. Dogs still jump from Overtoun Bridge. The incidents are less frequent than they once were, in part because owners who know the story now leash their animals before they cross. But every few years another collie or labrador goes over the same right-hand parapet on another clear, dry afternoon, and another household learns that the warning sign was meant for them. The mink are still in the stonework. The geometry of the bridge has not changed. The dogs that walk across it on a dry day are still walking into the same trap their predecessors fell into in the 1950s, and a sign in plain English, addressed to humans, is the only thing standing between them and the rocks below.