Was it Mark Twain who said democracy is the worst form of government? Or maybe he just called it rule by idiots? I think I am confusing Twain with Churchill. Either way, I’m most likely taking this questionable quote out of context, as I mean to apply it to America today.
Democracy is absurd. There is nothing ideal about being ruled by the ever changing opinion of the mass, particularly when that opinion is shaped by devious persons with self serving agendas.
A republic would be closer to ideal, a set of basic principals upheld, protected, and enforced by trust worthy individuals. But, what good, intelligent, hard working man would ever submit to the institution of the state, to the rigid framework, the red tape, the leviathan mass and pace? None. A good man goes his way in search of wisdom, knowledge, challenges, adventure, innovation, economy, etc. Taking advantage of the preoccupation of good men, scoundrels creep into the halls of the republic. They appeal to the ignorant mass, exchange the republic for a democracy, and exploit the system for their profit.
What then is the best form of government? All are destined to become kakistocracies. In which case, I conclude, the best government is no government at all. Unless....
Unless government is a necessary evil, one evil staying another. A necessary evil? A concession then, good accepting evil as a means to an end. Seems contrary to ideals surrounding the paradigm of good and evil. Evil is either not as bad as we perceive it, or more horrifying than our minds could conceive.
In case of the former, good and evil are words we use to describe relative behavioral extremes and their consequences. The actual effects of those behaviors would have little impact beyond the feelings of human beings. I case of the latter, we are a lost people, to be pitied above all other creatures.