𓏲𝄢 。WORMIE ! !

"i love you, person on the internet. i may not know you but i love you. you may not know me but i love you. you’re an amazing person and you deserve to live. live for me, because i love you even if you have no idea who i am. no one deserves to feel suicidal. you’re a very important person to someone."

-anonymous

F2U with credit!

I started this back in January, halfway finished it, and then got struck by college and other stuff. I was just Not Having a Good Time™. Anyway. Finally locked in to push this out after my finals. Here's the bat man. I'm also going to reduce the amount of stamps from 9 to 6 because they're kind of a pain to make, but I will be increasing the amount of userboxes from 2 to 4.

Stamp template by rurihana-chan (edited) Shiny button font by 99fish Dividers by pixopix

The greater psych community is largely oblivious to non-disordered plurality. There are some cases of tulpamancy studies, but mostly they are completely unaware that non-disordered plurality is something people claim to have

DESPITE THIS they are greatly dismissive of and disbelieving in multiplicity based CDDs. I'm serious. Four years of psych school with a focus on trauma-based research and almost everytime I brought up multiplicity it was shot down as being unreal and a fault of the DSM-V for including it at all

additive edit from rbs n replies: also ppl with discolored teeth, and broken/damaged/decaying teeth, and missing/no teeth

The anti-end stance is one that includes the refusal to acknowledge or accept the personal experience of fellow human beings. It can be inherently dehumanizing, and it absolutely treats some people and their lived experiences as lesser than others because of how they present and understand themselves.

In comparison, the pro-endo stance is basically an "I believe my fellow beings" stance that's largely neutral in its position.

These two things are not the same, and it really bothers me when they're treated like they are just two sides of the same coin.

And yeah, some people choose to call themselves anti-endo for reasons that are not tied to their beliefs about endogenic systems. It's possible to accept that systems with different origin labels are having real experiences and not want to interact with them even then. I get that.

But plenty of folks on Tumblr use the tag and label to describe the underlying belief that systems not directly tied to severe trauma are either faking their experience, lying to themselves, or in some way misinformed about themselves. And the common terminology in other spaces absolutely ties anti-endos with these beliefs.

I feel like Sonar would resonate with that one Celestia image

support me on Kofi

ref below

(˶˃ ᵕ ˂˶) the z team is pro endo!