Imma fix wolves

unironically i think niche fetish art should be recognized as an art movement because really thats what it is. its a quite modern movement where art (across multiple mediums, frequently digital) is created by and for a particular fetish group—as opposed to most of history, where art is created by an artist for a wealthy sponsor or organization. fetish art is a medium where its understood that the artist and commissioner are not just on equal footing, but can mutually benefit in ways outside of the trade of art and currency (ie. mutual arousal). within "fetish art" there are also smaller art movements pertaining to particular fetishes, where individual artists and styles influence the whole. fetish art often does not aim to please a wide social audience, or impart moral ideas, or even communicate much more than surface level representations—but its not lesser for it. fetish art is art that appeals to one audience, and no one else. thats kind of fun, and incredibly freeing.

i bring a sort of “you should maybe interrogate your so-called ‘preferences’ to make sure they’re not literal textbook examples of severe unconscious bias” vibe that my woke gay friends dont really like

suicide note that says "don't let them think the haters won I just had other shit going on"

writing gay erotica at work right in front of my boss and she dgaf, real fujo queen... we stan an ally this pride month

to be fair she's quite literally playing with toys right now so at least im doing something related to our line of work (literacy?)