Balenciaga over sized and over limits
Again, I'm not a fashion person. However, as someone who observes and consumes a lot of social networks, such as Instagram and TikTok, this subject is always on the rise in the profiles that are part of my feed. Although I don't practice fashion, I follow many influencers whose main content is fashion. Because of this, I always admire and analyse fashion from an aesthetic and design point of view.
Currently, we can see a constant need to shock through fashion. Big influencers with partnerships with big brands like to call people's attention to the unusual, the strangeness, and the discomfort. In this scenario, we can identify two sides: the conservatives and the moderns. Just like in almost every kind of artistic manifestation. Fashion is also part of it all.
Personally, I'm between one and the other. I like the visual shock, that kind of image and design that causes discomfort because I believe that this is the only way that innovations emerge and give way to a more democratic fashion. However, I think it's important to keep old styles and designs so that fashion continues to speak to as many people as possible. However, separating beauty from fashion is an important step that I think is valid and I agree.
That said, I realize that there is a very famous brand that stands out in this segment. We are talking about Balenciaga. This brand, specifically, I never liked, not because of the appeal to what is different from them, which are always clashing with their collections that mix the dirty, the old and the new, for example. But it bothers me how they tend to take something that seems very undervalued and attach too much value to it. We can see influencers paying thousands of dollars on sneakers with the aesthetics all dirty and destroyed. The message that Demna Gvasalia, artistic director of the brand, wants to pass on in relation to sustainability and reuse is valid, however, you see an overvaluation of money in items that we can already find on the market with exorbitantly lower values, but not valued because they do not have the seal Balenciaga. It sounds hypocritical to me on the part of this loyal and very famous public that the brand tends to support, such as North American influencer and model Kim Kardashian.
But all this introduction is to talk about something recent that shocked everyone and maybe it's a little important to understand the limits of a brand in wanting to surprise people. Recently, in its new collection, Balenciaga presented an essay in which children held teddy bears wearing accessories from the BDSM universe. Something totally inappropriate for children. I am not even attaching the images here in respect of the kids. Even because, Balenciaga has deleted from all his platform the photoshoot now. if that weren't enough, small hidden messages like easter eggs were captured by the most attentive eyes, with small intentions of supporting Satanism. On the wall of the environment where these children are, there are children's drawings of demons, and an adhesive tape with the Balenciaga brand with the pronunciation mistake, instead of Balenciaga, we see baalenciaga with emphasis on the word Baal, which refers to a middle eastern demon.
We can say that all this was an isolated joke in bad taste or just a conspiracy theory. However, after this great controversy, in previous collections, such as the one he made in partnership with Adidas, internet researchers again found easter eggs, this time more discreet, but which already hinted at where Balenciaga was going. In this shoot, we have several models with sports suits in a formal office environment. So far, so good, the contrast of the environment with the stripped clothes of Balenciaga feat Adidas is very interesting and fulfills the role of attracting attention in a positive way. However, in several photos, it is possible to find some disturbing elements linked to pedophilia. A 2008 document, from the Supreme Court of the United States, in which its content defended the legalization of child pornography in animation format.
In this same image, a book was also found with the paintings of the Belgian artist Michaël Borremans, known for portraying scenes of cannibalism and child abuse. In another photo, in this same campaign, other Internet users pointed to a painting with the name of John Philip Fisher, a criminal convicted of raping his own granddaughter, from 6 to 16 years old.
After these controversies of trials of different collections came to light, some influencers, notably Kim Kardashian, took a stand against the brand, not agreeing with any type of content linked to child pedophilia and child abuse. Balenciaga then went public apologizing saying that despite always wanting to shock, they do not condone any cause linked to child exploitation and that they would hold those responsible for the campaigns responsible. However, it is very difficult to believe that there were two mistakes with the same themes that happened without the intention or artistic supervision of the brand. In my opinion, this just proves that the need to draw attention, even if in a negative way, can end up with fashion, or cause this innovation movement to have a big setback. Since, the conventional and conservative, at least, was in a safe zone and without polemics. This constant need to attract all the spotlight, even in a negative way, may be going too far by losing the limit of boldness. In my opinion, Balenciaga was already a little too much, and now they've proven they can go further. From its oversized clothes to its over-moral limits.