Venusâs thoughts on âIdentityâ topic
ââWe think that our faces are indexical to who we actually are on the inside. Makeovers, especially television makeovers, justify changes to how people look by claiming a kind of mismatch between what their current appearance is and who they are inside. According to this logic, makeovers become a necessary intervention and, indeed, a personal obligation to bring appearance and identity into alignment, upholding traditional racial, gender, class and ability biases around the meanings behind how people look.ââ(Aeon Magazine, March 18, 2019)
Where does such obligation come from? Culture. When weâre around 3-4 years old, we become conscious of our sense of self. From then on, we accumulate certain ideas from an external world (parents, friends, books and films), those gathered ideas shape our understanding of ourselves, we take those ideas as they were our own thoughts and somewhat true and it is understandable if these were the only truths we have been exposed to. It lives in us unconsciously, our sense of self (appropriate/good self) that is made up of those ideas comes before we learn to question it.
Do we ever bring our appearance and identity into the alignment? There is an obvious need to be recognised, not only how we feel inside, but more so recognised as this better version of ourselves that we wish to be. We want to be better than we are, and we want others to think that we already are that better version, the fictional self. We must understand the tricks that culture is playing on us and in that way sinks us into that deep addictive illusion of a good person or more so these days better person than everyone else. (Obtaining a social order like going to church every Sunday in historical times in order to be a good person, or these days posting on social media in order to exist as a part of new age community)
People objectify and judge each other all the time, imposing opinions based on opinions heard in the past (from external world). In basic words, when we judge/objectify we feel that we know something about someone only based on very limited number of knowledge and in that way by forming assumptions (we really believe in) which forms fictional truths. (Thatâs how we see others)
On the other hand, as we aware of our thought process judging others, we know that people will have to think something about us too, so we show them the best we can show to them. We want to be liked; we buy objects that represents us in some way. (Think about the objects we own, even the organic shampoo can say something about the person) We can think about artists who maybe looked at the concept of identity in personal possessions and how things have no soul in themselves, but we attach meanings to them and attach meanings to ourselves. Also how ads and business motivations play on our desires which then become needs. The illusion of buying things to improve our incompetent self (as a quick fix).
ââWe are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society.ââ â Edward Bernays
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnPmg0R1M04&t=86s
Thatâs the link to a documentary about Bernays, pioneer of mass manipulation if you can say like that :D
It is more psychological then artistic, but good ground of the topic if we want to prove the point that identity is a mere creation of culture and is constantly changing in order to appear likeable which changes as well. (Maybe even look at nature of fashion in terms of concealing something (the body) that is naked, ideas of shame, maybe even going back to religious (also cultural creation) ideas of inborn sin.)
Ashamed of our nature because from the early days we were taught to tame ourselves.
Living in a constructed system, against harmonious natureâŚ
Look at Schopenhauer for solutions
âHappiness belongs to those who are sufficient unto themselves. For all external sources of happiness and pleasure, are by their very nature, highly uncertain, precarious, ephemeral and subject to chance.ââ -Arthur Schopenhauer
 Not to depend on external world as much as possible is a good start. Schopenhauer talks about our uncontrollable desire to endlessly strive for satisfaction that never arrives. The pattern of wanting something and once we have it wanting something else.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iw36V_iXR2k Kierkegaard ideas of becoming through self (VERY GOOD STUFF)
Okay, thinking about the face⌠we can very much relate to our use of photography and representation and how we feel in never does the justice to represent ourselves and the way art does a better job in revealing our true feelings through metaphors (for me), dance, abstract art or any kind of form of free expression for the sake of âletting it outâ rather then expression as âconstructing oneselfâ. Hope you get what I mean, more the messy self that is an obvious chaos, rather then well put together on fake grounds. We can also think about acceptance of that messy chaos and in that way dance with it, be friends with it rather then build something that is against our nature đ