Marx ˃ᗜ˂

first off: pankie claims that he did not see/know about the proship content his partners were engaging with, and therefor he should not be held accountable. however, there's evidence showing that pankie was present + participated in these types of conversations with his partners.

pankie claims he separated from these two in september/october. i was skeptical of this because: pankie only started to PUBLICLY say this when a fight broke out in the proship servers/gcs they were in, and threats of exposing each other publicly became a reality.

this fight went on for months, and was detailed in a doc released by one of the members in the proship server/gc exposing pankie, ren/razz, and clowntainment, as well as pankie's complacency in the situation. the overall fight was over ren's gaslighting + manipulation

this fight took place in a proship environment, with only the secret proshippers in the server/gc being aware of it. however, it spread far enough that people outside of it started to notice weird things. multiple people would question pankie about it. this was pankie's response:

pankie was also approached by concerned friends who saw ren interacting with proship content such as zoophilia and pedophilia. in the response below you can see pankie claiming he had no idea. however he was confronted for previously dismissing ren's behavior and saying it wasn't his business

notice how pankie keeps claiming he has no idea about anything and he's not involved at all, as well as the dates that he made this claim. he even tries to claim that he has no idea what his friend is talking about but ALSO says it's personal and he shouldn't say anything.

pankie is doing everything to distance himself from his boyfriend's behavior, and doing everything to claim he has no idea what the "situation" is, and that he has no idea ren liked proship things. even though pankie was active in the proship servers/gc his partners were in

now for this next part of the thread im going to show you how pankie has handled situations like this in the past; where he was approached by victims who asked for his help regarding groomers in his server or friends who tried to tell him he was acting inappropriately.

a 13 year old in pankie's art server told pankie that their groomer/abuser was in the server, and requested that pankie take action. they provided evidence as well. however rather than remove the groomer, pankie suggested the victim leave instead, and warn their own friends.

because the groomer was 15, pankie didn't believe the grooming allegations the victim was telling him about. even though the 15 year old admitted to it themselves and all of their victims were around 11-12 years old or younger.

rather than removing the abuser/groomer, pankie suggested the idea of just closing down the chat in the server so that no one could talk. the groomer was allowed to stay, and pankie left the victim with no choice but to leave.

not only was the groomer allowed to stay and the victim was forced to leave, but the groomer reached out to the victim to try and address the doc they made about pankie and the situation, and even confirmed that they and pankie had gotten closer and became friends.

tumblr won't let me add more images, so i'm going reblog this with the second part.

however, pankie wouldn't take the situation seriously and would pretend to have changed but would "accidentally" say racial slurs again and joke about it. he'd even try to tell his then partner to say racial slurs too, despite them being white as well and uncomfortable with it

his ex stated that pankie's way of handling conflict was with "a lot of avoidance and making light of it to make it seem less serious." we can see he still does this in the below example, and we can see his avoidance when confronted about his partner's proship behavior as well.

pankie tried to claim that he had no idea that his boyfriends were into any of this. but i have also started to hear that pankie is now changing this to say that ren and clowntainment were the "masterminds" behind everything and pankie was uninvolved. this however is false.

in september, when the situation was coming out, i confronted clowntainment. he tried to deny knowing, but in doing so he revealed that pankie and ren originally excluded him and had a gc where they'd roleplay extreme/proship fetishes they wrent sure they could trust him with yet

WARNING FOR NSFW TEXT IN NEXT TWO SCREENSHOTS:

while clowntainment's claim that he had no idea about their proship behavior is completely false, since there are screenshots above from june/july proving otherwise, it does show that pankie + ren were already engaging in that kind of stuff without his influence

theres also word that pankie has tried to claim that clowntainment forced him into a relationship with ren, but this is false as well. he even disproves this himself in his own statement? pankie met ren first, dated him first, and then they invited clowntainment as their third

pankie also claims that he would never put children in harm or expose them to sexual content, and that he wishes people would tell him if he made a mistake. but when questioned for turning an nsfw fetish drawing "sfw" by editing the expression, pankie doubles down and defends himself.

what pankie conveniently left out is that this wasn't just a "suggestive drawing" turned sfw. it was an explicit drawing in a collection of nsfw macro/micro fetish drawings. pankie took the least explicit out of the bunch and edited it to share with their minor audience

(CENSORED NSFW BELOW)

i shouldn't have to explain it but taking nsfw fetish images and editing them to look innocent just so you can show it to your fanbase, which you KNOW consists of minors, is extremely predatory. it exposes unwilling and unknowing people (AND MINORS!!) who did not consent to engaging with fetish material.

it's a complete overstep of boundaries and ignores consent entirely. this is a tactic that many people use to get people to unknowingly engage in their fetish.