doki doki my todoroki

I don't see anyone talking about this yet so I'll start!

I already have 3 blogs on my dash who's account is being used to spam my feed with "adult game advertisements"

DON'T CLICK THE LINK UNDERNEATH IT, OBVIOUSLY

This is what it looks like:

I spoke with the artist and she said she can't get on her account again

the narrative forces us to take on the abuser’s perspective, prioritizing his feelings over the feelings of his victims. the storytelling is dominated by his self-pity, as though that amounts to any, demonstrable action to be better and make amends. this is not just a BNHA problem either, because society consistently privileges the feelings of abusers over the very real danger and harm they pose to their victims. survivors are pressured to forgive and move on because apologists are so stirred by the pathetic groveling of an abuser they will sacrifice justice to quell his aching heart, until survivors are themselves gaslit into believing this “real” guilt from the abuser. and then the abuse starts up again, of course.

this is a hard pill to swallow, but anyone who writes stories that prioritize or “delve into” an abuser’s guilty mindset is actively enabling domestic violence. it reinforces the cultural narrative that an abuser’s feelings—not his actions—matter, and that the feelings and safety of his victim absolutely don’t. it places people (usually women) in danger of staying in abusive situations because we’ve hammered into her head this falsehood that he really feels bad. he hits you? he feels bad about it. he rapes you? he feels bad about that too. how could you leave him when he truly deeply feels so bad (until the next time he does it)?

Aizawa: permission denied.

The literary Sherlock Holmes was an autistic coded character before people knew what autism was.

The literary Sherlock Holmes was an explicitly aromantic character before people had a word for that.

Literary Holmes solved mysteries not merely for the intellectual stimulation but also out of a genuine desire to do good. He cared deeply about every client. HE WAS NOT A HIGH-FUNCTIONING SOCIOPATH! He could definitely be insensitive and blunt but he was not callous or unfeeling.

Literary Sherlock threatened to beat a guy who was being creepy with his own stepdaughter.

Literary Sherlock learned to grow past his misogyny after a woman outsmarted him.

In particular, he was always respectful to Mrs Hudson, never belittling or talking down to her (the otherwise enjoyable Guy Ritchie films screw this up too). In fact, they got along so well that they were actually a very popular ship back in the day.

Literary Holmes would NEVER call Watson an idiot. He was his only friend who he loved and respected, even if he did get frustrated with him sometimes. He didn’t need to belittle others to feel powerful.

Literary Holmes and Watson broke into a corrupt man’s house and witnessed him being murdered by a woman he was blackmailing. They knew exactly who she was but they let her get away because they were chaotic good like that.

Literary Holmes had HUMILITY: something a smug prig like Steven Moffat will never understand. He could be arrogant but he had a sense of humour and was willing to admit when he was wrong. And he was wrong sometimes because he was a flawed human being, not some gross male power fantasy.

Literary Holmes respected the working class and was often disdainful of the rich. In Victorian England!

Literary Holmes indirectly caused the death of a guy who abused (and implicitly molested) his daughters and he didn’t give a single fuck about it.