not really any memorable context he just said that
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Mike Driver
$LAYYYTER
d e v o n

titsay
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Today's Document
YOU ARE THE REASON

Kiana Khansmith

#extradirty

Discoholic 🪩
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

izzy's playlists!

tannertan36

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
todays bird

Product Placement
Claire Keane

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Poland
seen from Israel

seen from Italy

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Sweden

seen from Malaysia
seen from Kazakhstan

seen from Singapore

seen from South Korea
seen from Nigeria

seen from South Africa

seen from United States

seen from Ecuador

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
@thequeenofsastiel
not really any memorable context he just said that

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Albania fans breaking spaghetti in front of Italy fans 😂😂😂
I have so many questions
the most Child Emperor urge i have is to shout "BOOORRIINGGG!!!" when i have to witness something i dont like for too long
When I was a freshman in high school the teacher I considered coolest once flopped down on the couch in his classroom and did that exact thing because he didn't find the direction we were taking our discussion of The Illiad at all interesting.
this is the funniest headline i've ever seen
Faig Ahmed is renowned for his mesmerizing textile pieces. He completed his most recent carpet design after months of interruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. This remarkable red tapestry, ‘Doubts’, features intricate patterns that dissolve into a viscous fluid shape, framed by white tassels.
Ahmed’s contemporary carpets are based on traditional textile craftsmanship, which he then deconstructs and reimagines in new and exciting ways.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I love waking up to 99+ notifications and it's just one person who apparently fell in love with my blog. I feel so seen 😍
Was chatting with a potential partner on fetlife(basically Facebook for kinky people) and feeling very hopeful. We appear to be extremely compatible. But I've learned to be wary, and asked for him to provide a few people with fleshed out profiles to vouch for him. And for the first time he stopped being immediately accommodating and understanding about relationship boundaries and hard limits, and got cagey, asking if he could think about it. I find myself disturbed that of his 67 friends(all of whom are women, big red flag because it indicates that he hasn't made any male friends in the past 6 years on fet, and also all the groups he belongs to are devoted to finding partners, meaning developing friendships within the community isn't important to him), he can't immediately think of a single one he's confident will tell me he's a good guy. He asked if he could think about it because his history on there is "patchy" due to failed relationships and long absences. I've had failed relationships too and haven't been on fet much lately, but I can easily think of several people who I'm confident would vouch for me.
Yeah, no, fuck this. Dealbreaker. Not waiting for him to message me back. What a damn shame.
I’m paying to force seven thousand strangers to see a photo of my late husband having fun with his dog. Tumblr Blaze is totally worth it. XD
Thank-you to all of my new Internet stranger friends for being so gracious about having my post shoved onto your dashboards. I loved reading all of your kind tags and comments! Both Martin and Bosco have been gone for several years now but for 24 hours, they felt very present in my life. I greatly appreciate this gift. ❤️
Reblog to have your dashboard be visited by the spirit of joy that death can end but not erase.
Thank you to everyone who commented in their tags or messaged me. Indeed, today is “Martin and Bosco Day”. I originally whimsically blazed this photo on 13 July 2022. I never expected Martin and Bosco to travel so far and make so many new friends. The experience has been such a gift for me.
Happy Martin and Bosco Day 🥹
"You faced the monster inside of you, and you fought back."
That quote always brings me to tears. Because it's so true. It's an acknowledgement that Soulless Spike was more than just the demon that possessed him when he died. William remained. Suppressed and controlled by the vampire soul inside of him, but still there. And when that trace of who he had been as a human fell in love with Buffy, it grew stronger and stronger and stronger. And being surrounded by good people increased it even more. Especially the love he grew to have for Dawn as well, because I absolutely believe that he loved her too, and the fact that it was a paternal love rather than a romantic love was, I think, helpful on an even deeper level. Spike was surrounded by love, and that bit of William that remained was bolstered so much by that love that it grew stronger than his vampire soul. He faced the monster inside of him, and he fought back. And he fucking won.
Hence why it can’t be demonic possession.
Demonic possession doesn’t work like that.
Sure, there was a demon.
But the demon was HIM. Spike was always an evolution and corruption of William. If it was an actual possession, then none of William would be there to find because it wouldn’t be William the entity that became “Spike”.
“Spike” would just be some random demon that identity-thefted “William” when it took his body.
The demon couldn’t have replicated “William”.
So the answer is that “William” was always in Spike.
So it’s not a possession. It’s a corruption.
That’s why “Spike” doesn’t just disappear when he gets a soul. Because he was never just a random demon.
He was “William” as a demon.
And “William” just fought the demon side of him.
And I really would argue that every single vampire in the Buffyverse is this way besides Angel. Angel is an outlier.
Angel is only a possession simply because Angel says so because he cannot reconcile with his dark side. He is ashamed of it. Reviles it. So he split-identifies from it.
Willow does the exact same thing with “Dark Willow”.
But no one says that Dark Willow is a different entity because we are aware that the dark magic corrupts her.
Basically… it’s just a psychological thing. It’s not real.
This is proven in the Angel episode “Eternity” where Angel turns evil over a fucking Placebo effect. The soul isn’t even involved at all. It’s the mind. Always the mind.
And how different Angel was. It was a completely different person. And then Spike came and broke all their narrative, lol.
The arguments that souled/unsouled vampires are different people drive me crazy because they betray intellectual incuriosity about the source material. You're engaging on a surface level and that's fine for you, but insisting that the surface level is the correct read is boring and media illiterate.
For one thing, it suggests that the line we hear in Lie to Me (That's not how it works. You die. And a demon sets up shop in your old house. It walks and talks and remembers your life but it's not you.) is the final authority, when the entire season that follows it is about reconciling with how wrong this is. It's something Buffy says to Ford; something she says that she was taught by her watcher(s), who were instructed by the Council, who is demonstrated in every. single. interaction. they have with any of our characters to be inherently self-serving, underhanded, ruthless, and incredibly black-and-white in how they not only view demons, but their own slayers. The Slayer is not a person, but a weapon, and their intent is to use that weapon the way THEY see fit. Weapons that can question the doctrine are dangerous.
Furthermore, this might have been the general conceit of the show at its inception, but the show outgrew its inception pretty damn quick. For instance, Angel wasn't supposed to survive past S2. He went on to his own show that is fundamentally about his struggle for redemption, which makes no sense at all without first acknowledging that he is responsible for his actions, whether they are souled or not. For if he's not, why even fight? Why not just say "that's not me" and walk away?
And then, in the end, we get to Spike. Spike is a rejection of this philosophy and not only does this make for a better story, it makes for a more nuanced world. It's boring if all vampires are evil and all nonvampires are good. What makes Buffy standout is its eventual, even reluctant willingness to go places that are not black and white. To put the idea of responsibility and accountability on the table and see how different characters interact with it. To question what makes a monster and have the answer be more interesting than "a set of fangs."
I have done a lot of thinking and discussion about vampires and souls since I made this post, and came to the conclusion that a vampire soul does not have a mind of its own; it's simply a set of violent instincts that are instilled in a human, and suppresses their ability to have empathy and sympathy for others. But William's ability to love and care for others was so profound that even the violent and cruel instincts that came with the vampire soul weren't able to take those things away from him.
In other words, please don't tell me I have intellectual incuriosity.
That statement was never aimed at the OP, fwiw, rather people who take the S1 line on souls to be gospel truth without questioning the motives of the people who expose it and refuse to engage with the rest of the canonical evidence we're given to the contrary.
Obviously if you engage with the idea at all, regardless of conclusion, you are not intellectually incurious.
I appreciate that, but it did rather sound like you were directing the comment at me, and I find it frustrating that to this day people are reblogging the version of this post which ends with the post you made that seems to imply that. I wish people would stop doing that. It's hurtful. I'm a very curious person, and I think a great deal about everything that catches my interest. It's very rare for me to simply accept the surface level of a topic.
I don't really blame you, I'm just exhausted and your words unintentionally pressed a sore spot. I loved my father, and he loved me and did his best, but when I was a kid he would sneer at me anytime I seemed to not be curious about something he found interesting, and he would call me uncurious about the world. Which just wasn't ever true.
I apologize for getting so personal, and that this response is a year later(this post has just been reblogged and liked a lot the last couple days), but I wanted to explain my reaction. I hope you can understand.
I understand, and I might have been careless in my wording. I trusted that the context of what you said was in harmony with my line of thought, that it was an extension rather than an argument, and used the royal "you" rather flippantly. I could have been clearer. But impact matters more than intent, and the impact was hurt. For that I am truly sorry.
On my end, as someone who runs social platforms for a Spuffy exclusive archive, I get a lot of nastiness in DMs and comments, and typically just block and move on, but they grate, so I often "answer" the content (not the person) on my personal blog, typically with frustration. Not an excuse but an explanation, I hope. Again, I could've been more thoughtful in how I framed this; tonal clarity and intent is never a given on the internet, and I clearly took that for granted.
It means a lot that you said that. I was almost drunk with exhaustion when I wrote my response and got more personal than I think I would have otherwise. I do use this blog as a journal on occasion, but I don't tend to open up like this in fandom posts about unpleasant childhood experiences. Thank you for the non judgmental response, and being understanding about my overreaction. It's always really nice to be able to have an interaction with someone able and willing to give this level of consideration and compassion instead of anger and defensiveness, especially on the internet. You seem like a genuinely good person, and the people in your life are lucky to know you. Have a lovely day 💐❤️

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Another thing I like about the way Sun looks at Jay after Jay orders invites Sun to come home with him is the fact that he isn't remotely defiant. He looks utterly vulnerable and open, because he's rapidly approaching a place where saying no to Jay just isn't an option for him. Not out of a sense of coercion(though I won't deny that Jay has attempted to use that with Sun, but I rather think that he only did that because he knew that Sun wanted him; I don't know if I quite believe that he would use his position of real life power on someone who genuinely wasn't attracted to him), but because he's sinking into his submission. He's starting to accept Jay as his Dom, even though he's fighting against that desire. You can see how his vulnerability has advanced from this moment in episode 5:
He was still feeling quite submissive in this moment, but it faded rather quickly:
He resented that feeling of submission, and looked away from Jay rather than let Jay continue to see the submission in his eyes. Sun doesn't look away from people almost ever. He stares them down, uninterested in hiding his emotions unless they betray vulnerability of some kind, which they usually don't. But he can feel that here, and needs to hide from it.
However, in ep 7, he doesn't look away from Jay. He doesn't hide the vulnerability that comes with his desire to submit:
He lets himself feel it, and lets Jay see it, which is a pretty big step for him.
I love them 😭😭😭😍😍😍
op disabled reblogs but i really wanted this post on my blog again
Me with anything by MAME
things that totally happened on The Untamed: Lan Wangji’s kinks include justice and Wei Wuxian
This scene is so fucking meaningful. Jay has enjoyed Sun's brattiness
But he's starting to get tired of Sun pretending that he doesn't want to be with him
And Sun just doesn't know how to handle that. He doesn't want to feel this way about Jay. He's almost always been a Top. But now he has this Dom coming at him, and the sub in him can't help but respond.
Then of course we have the glorious "you'll beg me" line. Followed by
And the way Sun looks at him, vulnerable and confused
His walls so clearly broken down
And then Jay just walks away without even checking to make sure that Sun is following. Because he knows there's no chance that Sun won't after looking at him like that.
There weren't nearly enough scenes between them this ep(though it was good regardless), but this one makes up for that.
"You faced the monster inside of you, and you fought back."
That quote always brings me to tears. Because it's so true. It's an acknowledgement that Soulless Spike was more than just the demon that possessed him when he died. William remained. Suppressed and controlled by the vampire soul inside of him, but still there. And when that trace of who he had been as a human fell in love with Buffy, it grew stronger and stronger and stronger. And being surrounded by good people increased it even more. Especially the love he grew to have for Dawn as well, because I absolutely believe that he loved her too, and the fact that it was a paternal love rather than a romantic love was, I think, helpful on an even deeper level. Spike was surrounded by love, and that bit of William that remained was bolstered so much by that love that it grew stronger than his vampire soul. He faced the monster inside of him, and he fought back. And he fucking won.
Hence why it can’t be demonic possession.
Demonic possession doesn’t work like that.
Sure, there was a demon.
But the demon was HIM. Spike was always an evolution and corruption of William. If it was an actual possession, then none of William would be there to find because it wouldn’t be William the entity that became “Spike”.
“Spike” would just be some random demon that identity-thefted “William” when it took his body.
The demon couldn’t have replicated “William”.
So the answer is that “William” was always in Spike.
So it’s not a possession. It’s a corruption.
That’s why “Spike” doesn’t just disappear when he gets a soul. Because he was never just a random demon.
He was “William” as a demon.
And “William” just fought the demon side of him.
And I really would argue that every single vampire in the Buffyverse is this way besides Angel. Angel is an outlier.
Angel is only a possession simply because Angel says so because he cannot reconcile with his dark side. He is ashamed of it. Reviles it. So he split-identifies from it.
Willow does the exact same thing with “Dark Willow”.
But no one says that Dark Willow is a different entity because we are aware that the dark magic corrupts her.
Basically… it’s just a psychological thing. It’s not real.
This is proven in the Angel episode “Eternity” where Angel turns evil over a fucking Placebo effect. The soul isn’t even involved at all. It’s the mind. Always the mind.
And how different Angel was. It was a completely different person. And then Spike came and broke all their narrative, lol.
The arguments that souled/unsouled vampires are different people drive me crazy because they betray intellectual incuriosity about the source material. You're engaging on a surface level and that's fine for you, but insisting that the surface level is the correct read is boring and media illiterate.
For one thing, it suggests that the line we hear in Lie to Me (That's not how it works. You die. And a demon sets up shop in your old house. It walks and talks and remembers your life but it's not you.) is the final authority, when the entire season that follows it is about reconciling with how wrong this is. It's something Buffy says to Ford; something she says that she was taught by her watcher(s), who were instructed by the Council, who is demonstrated in every. single. interaction. they have with any of our characters to be inherently self-serving, underhanded, ruthless, and incredibly black-and-white in how they not only view demons, but their own slayers. The Slayer is not a person, but a weapon, and their intent is to use that weapon the way THEY see fit. Weapons that can question the doctrine are dangerous.
Furthermore, this might have been the general conceit of the show at its inception, but the show outgrew its inception pretty damn quick. For instance, Angel wasn't supposed to survive past S2. He went on to his own show that is fundamentally about his struggle for redemption, which makes no sense at all without first acknowledging that he is responsible for his actions, whether they are souled or not. For if he's not, why even fight? Why not just say "that's not me" and walk away?
And then, in the end, we get to Spike. Spike is a rejection of this philosophy and not only does this make for a better story, it makes for a more nuanced world. It's boring if all vampires are evil and all nonvampires are good. What makes Buffy standout is its eventual, even reluctant willingness to go places that are not black and white. To put the idea of responsibility and accountability on the table and see how different characters interact with it. To question what makes a monster and have the answer be more interesting than "a set of fangs."
I have done a lot of thinking and discussion about vampires and souls since I made this post, and came to the conclusion that a vampire soul does not have a mind of its own; it's simply a set of violent instincts that are instilled in a human, and suppresses their ability to have empathy and sympathy for others. But William's ability to love and care for others was so profound that even the violent and cruel instincts that came with the vampire soul weren't able to take those things away from him.
In other words, please don't tell me I have intellectual incuriosity.
That statement was never aimed at the OP, fwiw, rather people who take the S1 line on souls to be gospel truth without questioning the motives of the people who expose it and refuse to engage with the rest of the canonical evidence we're given to the contrary.
Obviously if you engage with the idea at all, regardless of conclusion, you are not intellectually incurious.
I appreciate that, but it did rather sound like you were directing the comment at me, and I find it frustrating that to this day people are reblogging the version of this post which ends with the post you made that seems to imply that. I wish people would stop doing that. It's hurtful. I'm a very curious person, and I think a great deal about everything that catches my interest. It's very rare for me to simply accept the surface level of a topic.
I don't really blame you, I'm just exhausted and your words unintentionally pressed a sore spot. I loved my father, and he loved me and did his best, but when I was a kid he would sneer at me anytime I seemed to not be curious about something he found interesting, and he would call me uncurious about the world. Which just wasn't ever true.
I apologize for getting so personal, and that this response is a year later(this post has just been reblogged and liked a lot the last couple days), but I wanted to explain my reaction. I hope you can understand.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
🥳
Yeah I'm not watching this. Boat and Oat have great chemistry, but the plot holes make the whole thing intolerable. What a pity.