DogPlayingCards

His throne is surrounded by projectors he most likely brought there himself, as well as his chair being decorated with broken angel halos, which is a bit morbid but also cool

Heck the chair itself was most likely stolen from Joey Drew’s office and has been stabbed with pipes to make its recognizable design.

And even in a small BATIM post a while back where bendy goes around taking photos of places in BATDR and stealing something from each location, eventually creating a version of the ink demon out of the materials he had stolen, LIKE LOOK AT THIS

“What’s next, a mixed-race immigrant on the autism spectrum?” Hi, my name is Rachel, also known as Rachna, and I’m a mixed-race immigrant on the autism spectrum. 

“What’s next, a transgender Latino man with chronic pain?” What, you mean my former colleague, Marco? 

I’m going to say something that’s going to bother some people and I don’t care.

Don’t come here lecturing us about morality and the protection of minors when you’re throwing serious accusations around loosely and carelessly like they mean nothing. There is a massive difference between calling out something genuinely harmful and going on a witch hunt over nothing. Using heavy terms loosely and inaccurately does real damage — it dilutes the meaning, muddies the conversation, and makes it harder to identify and address actual harm being done to actual people. Yes, if someone is genuinely attracted to something that is clearly wrong and harmful, that deserves to be called out and taken seriously. But most of the time you people are just throwing the term around and accusing innocent people without a second thought — and for what exactly?

If you genuinely care about minors that much, where is that energy for real children? Real predators? Real victims? Because the ones screaming the loudest are often the same ones who go completely silent when it comes to actually helping real victims and stopping real predators. That’s not advocacy. That’s performance.

And I say all of this as someone who was groomed and sexually assaulted as a child. I know what real harm looks like. I know what real predators look like. So don’t come here throwing that word around like it costs you nothing — because to those of us who’ve actually lived it, it means everything. You treat fictional characters like they’re real and real people like they’re fictional. That’s the problem. It pisses me off.

And listen, I completely understand where some of you are coming from. This is a sensitive topic that should be taken seriously. Unfortunately, bad people exist and will always target childlike or mentally vulnerable characters — that is disgusting and deserves to be called out. They deserve to be exposed and punished for it. But people are throwing around accusations like “predator” and “groomer” way too loosely, and that is its own kind of damage.

From what I’ve seen, the majority of people engaging with these characters are responding to the design and the character as they exist now — not the child they once were. You can separate the two, even if it feels uncomfortable. AUs exist for a reason. Critical thinking needs to be applied here because words have power, and throwing them around carelessly has real consequences for real innocent people. This is getting out of hand.

With respect, in response to this post and the Poppy Playtime fandom, this post is doing exactly what I’m talking about.

Comparing people who engage with fictional characters to predators and groomers is a serious accusation that requires serious evidence — not just the fact that someone finds a character compelling or attractive. That comparison is not only inaccurate, it’s genuinely harmful to innocent people.

The argument that “a child acting maturely doesn’t justify engaging with them” would be valid if we were talking about a confirmed, canonically settled child. But that’s precisely the problem — the lore is not settled. The creators themselves contradict each other. One retracted his statement under backlash and also due to the fact that he’s no longer part of the team anymore. The artist Amber is not a writer or developer and has been contradictory before. MOB Entertainment has stayed deliberately vague. The lore is all over place which can be a bit confusing to some. A few things were retcon even like who drew the Poppy flower on Poppy’s door. If MOB wants to convince us that the majority of the toys are still children, they’re going to have to rewrite the lore or address the science — because right now, the two are actively contradicting each other. You cannot build a serious accusation on a foundation that the creators themselves can’t even decide on or even speak up about it due to fear of backlash. And frankly, I wish people would focus more on the actual lore and science instead of obsessing over the “child” aspect, because it’s causing unnecessary drama that didn’t need to exist — and MOB being intentionally vague is not helping anyone right now. And then people wonder why so many are quitting the fandom and view it as “toxic”.

There is also a meaningful difference between a character who was once a child and a character who is currently, functionally, and canonically a child. Trauma, warped development, and stunted psychology do not equal childhood. A damaged or mentally vulnerable adult is not a child. And engaging with fiction — including AUs where characters are aged up or reimagined (like the Mascots!AU by silverus-kvassus) — is not the same as engaging with actual children.

And before anyone decides to come into my comments with accusations — no, I am not a predator. I am not a groomer. I am a survivor of grooming and sexual assault, which is precisely why I take this topic seriously and precisely why I refuse to let those words be thrown around carelessly. Accusing me of that is not only false, it’s deeply offensive, and it will not be tolerated here.

I have a full discussion and theory post breaking all of this down if you want to read it and decide for yourself.

Real predators cause real harm to real people. Conflating that with fandom engagement doesn’t protect children. It just directs outrage at the wrong target while actual harm goes unaddressed.

I remember one time I had this friend in middle school, and back in middle school it was like quarantine times + I was really into art and people would always complement me on my art skills at the time.. I was kinda the art kid back then

and back then I used to take the bus to get home, along with some other kids, that friend included, there's this one memory that stuck out to me..

I remember sitting down on the stairs next to him with a notebook on my lap and a pen in my hand, I was gonna teach him how to draw a head, going over it step by step with the basic shapes and guidelines, and while I'm at it, he just kept admiring me, saying "I love how you draw, and your art, and you're so good, you should really keep going at it!" and at first I was just waving him off like "yeah, yeah.. thanks..", because I thought he was just saying all that to be nice, but then I started thinking..

he sat down with me, determined to learn or not, and saw my potential in art and just loved how I drew.. and he just kept GOING AND GOING on saying how amazing I was at it and I remember thinking to myself "damn I'm really looking like an asshole here, maybe I should take his complements more genuinely, maybe he really does mean that." and then I remember looking up from my notebook and trying to listen to his words..

..or some shit like that, idk I was in middle school man I genuienly don't remember that kid's face or name at all, and I might be wrong as to what I was thinking at the time

Something about bees