Summer 2026: Love and Distance
I'm married. I also have a long-distance boyfriend. My new bf and I met in the winter time. He was doing a short-ish stint in my city. Idk how it happened but it did. Now that we're apart, we don't talk often like typical bf-gfs do... keeps the heartache at bay, I guess. But we tend to send each other little pings every once in a while.
It's cool, but it's also a very much a source of anxiety. Because what do you do when you get exactly what you want?
What is it that I want, exactly?
There's what I have little pulse-desires for.
The desire to have him stay with me, to show him around the new apartment I just moved to. The desire to spend longer chunks of time together. Because I want to be his girlfriend. I want to be shown off. I want to claim him. I want to be a part of his life. But like, WHY?>?>> I don't think it's strange to have wanted these things when or if he lived in the same city. But now that we're apart, it is hard to not listen to the devil's advocate who says "justttttt goooo find anotherrrrr boyfriend, get over yourself."
As if it were so easy.
When it comes to polyamory... ugh, it's so confusing. It's like I have to hold these two truths which really seem to contradict the other.
I have to hold the truth that I may never find another "relationship", just a string of fuck-boy fuck-toys. I'm supposed to be happy with that, because I already have a husband. I'm supposed to be monk-like in my approach.
But if one were to lean into their monk side... why would anyone ever pursue long-distance polyamorous relationships? It's not like people are moving through the world and people are just falling into polyamorous relationships. That's bullshit. But then again...
It's the common narrative, the one I even used when me and my husband were first transitioning from monogamy to non-monogamy. It was:
"I want to be able to go to a bar and flirt and maybe even go home with someone."
SUCH a common line in the mono-to-non-mono pipeline for couples, right?
So why is it that THAT'S no longer enough? Was it ever going to be? I haven't really gone on any dates since I started dating my new boyfriend. It's bewildering at times. I think it's a fear of the build up and disappointment. The contrast disappointment as well. I don't want to go on dates only to realize I miss my bf.
But yes, it's long-distance. Part-time. Most of the time.
A typical long-distance relationship in the monogamous paradigm often lends to this unspoken pressure and assumption that this relationship "only makes sense" if we end up geographically in the same location someday, full-time.
And then comes the wave of angst when you realize that ending up in similar geographies probably means that either one of you is financially supporting the other (PRESSURE) or you both are riding on the fact that you can be physically employed in said city.
There's the fucking power dynamics of it all. It's so lame.
"I moved for you" starts becoming a line in all future fights you'll have with your future partner when the move starts to seem like it wasn't worth it.
But it can totally be worth it. I moved for my husband and it worked out incredibly well for me. Such a goddamn good decision. I ended up in a city that was made for me.
I don't want to move for a guy. That's not what's happening here.
I guess there's the reality that maybe I'm just trying to build something where That Something can't stand. Foundation is too flimsy.
I want to pick at the foundation though. There's a part of me that's convinced that I could get the thing. The thing of being with someone I love in a really hardcore, polyamorous way. Is it so crazy to be a romance snowbird? Like, seriously, I spend a month with him. I literally could.
Does my husband feel abandoned then? How rough would it be? Or is it the separation trial that we've both been flirting with on-and-off for the past 6 months?
I guess... I'm a romantic. And I felt it. I just wish I could tell if that's ever enough.








