Today's #Tango Truism 89: ‘Listening’ vs. ‘Waiting’
Today's #Tango Truism 89: Followers that have been taught to ‘wait’, and leaders that expect this behavior: You’re missing a whole piece of the spectrum of the ‘conversation’ that is tango! (See Related TT#97, 101, 147, 151, 192, 205, 206, 251)
Today's #Tango Truism 89th Clarity: More often than naught, as Followers are being trained, they hear this word over and over and over again, "Wait", or some variation of it, "You're supposed to wait for me!", "Why aren't you waiting ?", and my personal favorite "The Follower is supposed to wait for their lead!". 20 years ago, this would have been an acceptable way of 'receiving' the dance. Today, due to the influence of a change in music, but more over the infusion of true dance technique thru ballet dancers entering the form, as well as (and probably more importantly) the change in social moors as it pertains to women in general make the idea, and really the practice of 'waiting' a distant and outmoded, but 'quaint' idea for most American, European, and Russian dancers. First let's examine what it is, then we'll play with another idea that has replaced it, and the much larger concept that has really taken hold of the tango world.
Waiting is just that, waiting for something to happen. It is by its very nature, rushing to get to a point where you can relax and THEN 'wait' for something to happen! However, in the tango world this is not entirely true. Waiting literally means that the follower is being TOLD what to do, when to do it and in a lot of cases (depending on the embrace format) HOW to do it, and through out all of it is told to WAIT as a direct result of this 'rushing'!
Truthfully, and rightfully if you stop and you think about it, 'waiting' is a really a control dynamic. How so ? Imagine you are going on a trip, and that means going to the airport, and that generally means in this day and age (in the united states) going thru airport security lines! When you get to the airport, and ticketing, there's a long, long, long line to get thru security. At this juncture you have 3 choices. 1.) You can get in the queue to get thru security to get to your plane. 2.) Go to the head of the line (not advisable, unless instructed to do so - pay attention to the usage of language here...'unless instructed') or 3.) leave. More often than naught you will take option 1, option 2 is just rude, and option 3 does not get the job done as you need to get on the plane! So let's focus on #1.
In short, when you submit to the queue of all the people ahead of you, you are literally giving up your choices, and waiting for something to happen. You're ready, but the world is not! While there is nothing wrong with this, there's also something else going on that you are not entirely aware of: You are being controlled! You are giving up your power. The moment you stepped into the queue for security, you agreed to the societal rules which state that you do not go to the head of the line, there are OTHER people waiting ahead of you, and they need to catch their airplanes too. So you gave up that choice, even though its not a societal nicety, it's still a choice. And you also gave up the choice to leave and try another line, because there isn't one and you need to get on the plane. Waiting is by its very nature is a control dynamic. Meaning that you are literally giving up your choices, your power to make your own choices, in favor of someone else's rules, and judgement, to someone else's control. Like it or not, no one...no human being likes being controlled or ordered around by another willingly unless there is some benefit to it: Pleasure, Money, Money and Pleasure, Personal gain, Advancement, etc.
This control dynamic is really what 'waiting' is all about.
Relating to Tango ? So when someone, a teacher, or another dancer is telling the follower that they must 'wait' for the lead and really the leadER, what is actually happening is they're being told what to do, when to do it, and how to do it! In short, controlling them! If we continue the metaphor a bit, this is not a conversation, its literally talking AT someone and telling them what to do! Think of it this way from a leading perspective, you're telling a follower to DO an ocho, over and over and over again because you want to do ochos, or boleo, boleo, boleo...or volcadas again and again and again...and that's literally telling them what to do. Which is no fun, and so that we're clear...this just doesn't apply to repetition but everywhere in the dance. It means not allowing the follower the freedom to add their ideas of how the dance can be CO-CREATED not just a matter of fact!
There is another way to dance tango, and that's called 'Listening'. So that we're clear, the concept of 'Listening' is not just a word replacement. No. Its more far reaching than simple word replacement.
'Listening' by its very nature implies a conversation!
In a conversation there is a dialogue, there are questions being asked and answered, stating of a point of understanding, as well as restating that point, and then thru a process of 'active listening' trying to reach a conclusion that is supportive and clear. There is an equal balance of give and take. One person does not try to overtalk the other but actively engages their ability to hear the other person...to listen, to comprehend, to offer companionship and ideas if there is space for it, but the offer is stated as a 'how about we try this' not a 'WE ARE DOING THIS!'. Do you see the difference ? This is the same approach we want to take when dancing. Ideally it would be great if there were a dialogue of questions. From the Leader's point of view, "Where would you like to go ?", and from the Follower's point of view, "Can we go here ? or here ? or here ?".
Inviting a conversation in today's tango world offers up a whole different range of options for the follower to engage in the dialogue of the dance to discover what can happen TOGETHER VS being told what to do. At its simplest form, it makes the dance a far more rich experience for both leader and follower IF the leader creates space for the follower to interject their ideas of what they hear in the music. In its more advanced form it opens up whole swaths of "call and response" dialogue where in the end, there is no lead and no follower...there is dancing together!
One way to sum up this idea of 'Listening': Ask anyone if they like being told what to do, and if that is fun for them ? The answer is more than likely 'no'. If they have their choice (and they do), if they would like to engage in a conversation with someone. The answer is more than likely 'yes'.
As egalitarian as this way of dancing sounds, it does actually happen, and quite frequently with today's younger dancers, and is actually an expectation on multiple levels...not the least of which is how it effects not just what one is leading but HOW one is leading and HOW one is following! The use of "FORCE" to accomplish a particular piece of vocabulary in time to the music VS going WITH the partner to accomplish a piece of vocabulary in time to the music! There are some rules of thumb here that we do actually have to pay attention to when engaging in this way of dancing which is: THE MUSIC. Which is to say that one can only dance to what you hear in the music. For instance if the follower hears a secondary beat against the primary beat that the leader is hearing but not accentuating, then there is no reason in the world why the follower can not play with that beat assuming that it does NOT interfere with the leader's primary beat! Which is to say that the follower can do whatever they want and however they want, just as long as they end up where they're supposed to be at the end of that beat! While this does give one the impression that the follower will be willful, defiant, and want to do their own thing. More often than naught, this does NOT happen. The whole goal of the relationship is to dance TOGETHER not separately, and in the end hopefully create a richer experience for both dancers. This is just ONE way to get to that richer experience, there are many ways. However, this one in particular does offer up a freer experience for both partners.