“It’s not that I don’t like to work but I wouldn’t make it my job.”
seen from Spain
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Poland

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Austria
seen from United States
seen from Yemen
seen from Tunisia
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Russia
seen from Israel
seen from Poland

seen from Austria
seen from Japan
“It’s not that I don’t like to work but I wouldn’t make it my job.”

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
“Jail Two Ships' Firemen,” Toronto Star. April 10, 1942. Page 38. ---- Victoria, April 10 - (CP) - Patrick O'Brynne and F. Roma, firemen on the dominion government hydrographic survey ship William J. Stewart, were sentenced to four months in jail on a charge of refusing to sail with their ship up the west coast of Vancouver Island March 27. They refused to sail unless they were granted a war bonus.
“26 Gay Spanish “Mutineers” Land in Halifax Under Guard,” Montreal Star. November 8, 1932. Page 1. ==== HALIFAX, Nov. 8 - (CP) - Gay and “delighted with the feed," 28 Spaniards arrived in Halifax today on the steamer Magnhild from St. Pierre and joked about being sent home to Spain to face charges of mutiny.
They had fared well since they left the Spanish trawler Euskalerria at St. Pierre, they said. According to a dispatch from the French possession, the 26 men and boys, comprising almost half the trawler's crew refused to work as a protest against rations they had received while fishing on the Grand Banks.
They went ashore at St. Pierre and refused to return to the ship. The French authorities communicated with Spain and received word that the men must return. The order had no effect on the men and the trawler picked up two dozen natives of the Island to fill their places.
The French authorities decided to deport the deserters and put them on the steamer Magnhild for Halifax. Arriving here today, they were locked up in the immigration detention quarters to await a liner for England. Thence they will he rent to San Sebastian, Spain to stand trial.
Some of the men spoke English and were quite talkative. They declared they had been overworked and underfed.
“We worked about 20 home a day and did not get sufficient bread to eat or water to drink,” said one of them. He said the “mutiny" consisted of leaving the ship at St. Pierre and refusing to return on board.
Officers of the Magnhild said the men were not treated as prisoners and were easy to handle. They ate ravenously from the time they boarded the vessel until she reached Halifax.
“Deckhands in Court,” Toronto Globe. November 22, 1911. Page 2. ---- Hamilton, November 21 - Seven deckhands, George Smith, Alex. Smith, Peter Bartmann, Pat Green, John Collins, Roy Howe and Henry Karns, all of Toronto, were charged at the Police Court this morning was refusing to obey orders from Captain Henderson of the Macassa. The prisoners refused to help to ‘coal’ the steamer. Magistrate Jelfs allowed them to go, as the steamboat company did not want them sent to jail.
“Convict Strapped Refused To Work,” Toronto Star. January 30, 1939. Page 01. ---- 53 Burwash Inmates Put on Bread and Water ---- Fifty-six inmates of Burwash industrial farm were disciplined last week for refusal to work, Hon. H. C. Nixon stated today. One man was given six strokes of the strap and placed in isolation with two others. The remaining 53 were put on bread and water for three days, according to the official report made by the superintendent. The trouble has been cleared up and the men are back at work today, Mr. Nixon said. The men also lost 10 days’ ‘good time’ for their refusal. The men refused to go to work claiming it was too cold, Superintendent Powell said in his respect.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Can You Refuse Work During a Pandemic?
“[N]on-essential businesses in Ontario [have] shut their doors for two weeks to help curb the spread of COVID-19. But a surprising number of industries will still be allowed to operate, including dry cleaners, take-out restaurants, cannabis shops, lawyers’ offices, and car dealerships. While Public Health officials have harped on the need for people to social distance, some are worried those same warnings won’t be heeded by workplaces. ... There are no specific rules outlined for essential businesses that are allowed to operate, leaving some workers questioning if they’ll have the right to refuse if appropriate safety measures aren’t in place.”
“Ford says they do. ... But one employment lawyer says it’s not that simple. ‘There’s always been a right to refuse unsafe work in our occupational health and safety legislation,’ Stuart Rudner told CityNews. ‘But we’re obviously in unchartered territory, and it’s hard to say how we apply it now.’ Rudner said every case has to be judged on its own merit and factors, and the circumstances have to be specific to an employee and their workplace. A pandemic alone is not reason enough to miss work, but an employee can refuse if there is a legitimate threat to their safety, and the circumstances pass what he calls ‘the reasonable persons test’ — would any reasonable person, in the same circumstance, consider their heath to be at risk?”
“He gave the example of someone being told they have to work next to a person exhibiting all the symptoms of COVID-19. In that scenario, he said it’s reasonable to believe their health would be at risk and they would be justified refusing work. But what about having to take public transit and risk exposure to get to your job? Rudner said that likely wouldn’t pass the test. ... The resolution in that scenario would be to find alternative transportation. ... Rudner said employers have an obligation to provide a safe work environment, and suggested they protect themselves from liability by adjusting workplaces to allow for the recommended two-metre separation between people. ... Ultimately, he said concerned staff should address issues with their employers, and document any requests for accommodation or safety measures before refusing work, and contact the Ministry or an employment lawyer.”
City News, March 25, 2020: “Can you refuse work during a pandemic?” by Ginella Massa
Canadian Law of Work Forum, March 21, 2020: “Work Refusals and COVID-19,” by Paul McLean
Occupational Health and Safety Act: Part V: Right to refuse or to stop work where health and safety in danger
Strikeman Elliot, March 29, 2020: ““I’m Not Doing That!”: The Right to Refuse Unsafe Work Under Occupational Health and Safety Legislation in Alberta and British Columbia,” by Sheena L. Owens
USW on the Right to Refuse by Province and Territory Amidst COVID-19
United Steelworkers, 2020: “Right to Refuse”
United Steelworkers, 2020: “Right to Refuse by Province and Territory”
United Steelworkers, March 31, 2020: “A USW District 6 Guide (Ontario and Atlantic Canada) in the Context of COVID-19 (as of March 31, 2020)” (7 pages, PDF)
United Steelworkers, April 6, 2020: “A USW District 3 Guide (Western Canada) as of April 6, 2020” (4 pages, PDF)
United Steelworkers, 2020: “Ontario - Exposure Reporting: Coronavirus in the Workplace” (1 page, PDF)
United Steelworkers, April 8, 2020: “United Steelworkers in Niagara Get Busy Fighting COVID-19”
USW COVID-19 Resources
Essential service workers are not feeling safe
The Globe and Mail, March 26, 2020: “Ottawa shuts Service Canada centres after employees refuse to work,” by Sean Silcoff and Tom Cardoso
CBC News, March 27, 2020: “In Ontario, construction is an essential service, but some workers fear COVID-19 puts them at risk,” by James Dunne
TVO, March 24, 2020: “You may be happy that the LCBO is still open — but employees aren’t,” by David Rockne Corrigan
The Tyee, March 30, 2020: “Working in a Pandemic: Stories of Anxiety, Uncertainty, Poverty and Kindness”
An employer is lawfully required to assess how to adequately protect its employees from the coronavirus, much like other hazards, even if the employee's role is inherently dangerous.
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=5209a7d7-c005-4a17-8269-16d520f0602e&utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+General+section&utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2020-02-28&utm_term=
Via @tiqqun.