Further musings on iconic John wear
So, I tried replying to @willowgrovecreates kind reply and it...didnāt work. So posting this instead, with the OP being here
Thank you! Itās very sweet of you to try and help me out here :D
Iāve been pondering this for a bit after posting and I think I may have come up with an answer. I was browsing around and came across silhouettes of both Sherlock and John and it kind of clicked.
They were both instantly recognizable and I asked myself āWhy is that? What makes them so recognizable, even in silhouette? What distinguishes Sherlock? Why is this not Alan Turing or Vincent van Gogh or any other character Benedict has played? Or even any other tall, slim male in dress shoes, a coat and his arm crooked?ā
The answer was, of course, that the collar and the bottom of the coat and the curly hair gave it away definitively. The angle of the silhouette didnāt make the scarf visible but it did capture the pose, a bit of a classic one for the character, given promotional material. It wasnāt anyone it could be but Sherlock.
Okay, so far, so good. Now to try and apply the same thing to the silhouette of John. His jumper isnāt visible, nor is his bomber jacket, not clearly. In fact, for all that is visible in the silhouette, he could wear a leather jacket and a pair of baggy tweed trousers. No facial details can be seen and thereās no accessories to be seen.
So, what makes it clear that itās John and not some random person?
It suddenly clicked, then. itās his pose that does it. You know it. Arms folded across his chest fairly loosely, body turned three quarters towards the camera, head tilted just so. John doesnāt need something to wear to make him recognizable. He manages that just by force of personality, by a very specific pose.
The fact that Sherlock is more readily recognized by something that he dons rather than something innate can probably be linked to a deeper character analysis but I am not going to try my hand at that. I majored in law and English so I shanāt try and play a tuppenny-haāpenny psychologist. This is just an observation.
All of this, though, doesnāt change the fact that I am still without iconic John-wear. Youāre right, Willow, a teapot with a jumper looks silly (my step-gran would beg to differ but she knits cosies with cable-knit and roses on, soā¦) and the flower in the quills runs the risk of him just looking like a girl in the best Minnie Mouse tradition. What I could do was make another scarf in the colour of the oatmeal jumper and wrap it around his neck, let it tell its own story.
Do you think that might work?