While meditating on wiggle room, I realize that many of the changes, human beings try to implement, might be rather technical changes. Meaning: here’s the problem – let’s fix it!
In “A Failure of nerve: Leadership in times of the quick Fix.”, Edwin Friedman*) describes, what the supposed need for quick fixes does to us – what it does to leadership and community. Friedman states, that being a non anxious leader comes down to self-differentiation. This being a core value for fruitful leadership. And while this is not a condition, one is born with, or wakes op with one fine day, this is mainly a direction in which non anxious leadership steers. Maintaining Self-Differentiation amongst poorly self-differentiated humans though, does demand a lot of strength! Strength that eventually might be missing, when it comes to creative and joyful ways of being church.
On the other hand, I also realize, that my search for stakeholders in the congregation, I am currently serving, apparently has been in vain. Might well be, that possible stakeholders are just holding in their breath, in order to find out, where this is leading to… However, how can we see, where this is leading us, when we don’t start? It seems, that people want or expect me (as their pastor), to be directive – which I have basically been refusing to do, for 5 years now… Why? Because it is not primarily my work that counts, it’s about the work of the congregation. The fact, that we are only seeing minor progress is – in my opinion – only slightly related with the experience of the pandemic (and the war on European territory).
Wiggle room then happens within liminal space**). Liminality being understood as the psychological process of transitioning across boundaries and borders. One can say: Liminality happens on the threshold. Anthropologist Victor Turner describes liminality in the light of Rites de Passage ***). On the other side of the threshold, something different might take place.
Whereas a physical threshold might be rather small. One might stand on the threshold for quite a while, but then one will go over the threshold and move into the next room. Eventually of course, one might turn around and go back into the former room. But then, what did we win? Furthermore, standing on the threshold – may it be physical or virtual – does change us! We are not the same anymore, compared to how we where when we first stepped onto the threshold. Having come to this conclusion, we might give the question, “Where do we take it from here?” some serious thought!
And in the light of this, it would seem to me, that a conscious decision in favor of wiggle room is more the a valid option, as it bears, the chance of creating altogether an enthusiast culture. This – of course – is, what people have been hoping for, for so long! And as Tveitereit and Norheim are stating, “The enthusiast culture is never coercive. It is always voluntarily construed.”****) – let the wiggle room come – lykke til!
*) Edwin Friedman: “A Failure of Nerve: Leadership in Times of the quick Fix.”, Seabury Books, 2007. Also: https://www.google.com/search?q=friedman%27s+theory+selfdifferentiation&client=firefox-b-d&sxsrf=AJOqlzUXPbo2QaCZQPYVIEtfhiIs5p8rfA%3A1679306283972&ei=Ky4YZM_zOq6Mi-gPn4GcyAM&ved=0ahUKEwiPtZm0n-r9AhUuxgIHHZ8ABzkQ4dUDCA4&uact=5&oq=friedman%27s+theory+selfdifferentiation&gs_lcp=Cgxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAQAzIHCCEQoAEQCjIHCCEQoAEQCjoKCAAQRxDWBBCwAzoHCAAQgAQQEzoICAAQFhAeEBM6BggAEBYQHjoFCCEQoAE6BAghEBVKBAhBGABQkxNY801g8VZoAXABeACAAbkBiAH1FJIBBDAuMjCYAQCgAQHIAQjAAQE&sclient=gws-wiz-serp#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:8695a5e1,vid:RgdcljNV-Ew
**) cfr. Tveidereit and Norheim, Theological Wiggle Room as a Resource in Ordinary Theology.
***) Victor Turner, e.g. Betwixt and Between: The Liminal Period in Rites de Passage. In: Symposium on New Approaches to the Study of Religion, hg. v. Melford E. Spiro; Seattle, American Ethnological Society.
****) Tveitereid and Norheim, ebd.