âThe Wallâ Reading Response and Concept
I am going to investigate my own interpretation of the âwall and the crackâ between mauritanga and posthumanism. Below, is some of the information as well as key quotations, that, I managed to decode from Kim Solgaâs, âThe line, the crack, and possibility of architectureâÂ
The idea of the âcrack and the wallâ is the main concept which I wish to address within âThe Line, the crack, and the possibility of architecture: figure, ground, feminist performanceâ by author Kim Solga. Solga, mentions that âThe crack marks the spot where performance and architecture collide with one another, where plastic production comes alive as theatre, because the crack is architecture ruptured by the power of the mobile, expansive, and manipulable organic body.â (Solga, 8). So, the âwallâ serves almost as a platform for action to occur. The blockade of architecture. When both architecture and performance come into contact it creates new propositions, the culmination and build up of exterior forces creates a âcrackâ. with current paradigms and ideas to create new and interesting revelations. Â
âThe wild fig is the sign of a guerrilla garden, a rebel habitation: hybrid identities thrive within such a space, mark accidents of shared dwellingâtwo conditions of performanceâs own hybrid, somewhat renegade process of coming-into-being.â (Solga, 9)
MLA CITATION:Â
Kim Solga (2008). The line, the crack, and the possibility of architecture. Theatre Research in Canada 29(1), 1-28.
















