#the markles

The woman is clearly mentally ill and doesn't have that much of a platform for the Squad to be dedicating multiple days to "debunking" whatever insane lie she has concocted. The only people who care are y'all and Dan Wootton, who also no longer has a mainstream platform. Stop platforming these people.

The Adventures of the Markle’s will they ever stuff off? and then you have this shit Now back grid is hiding in parking lots! Really! Markle's are such attention seekers, total setup, 🤬 off , I'm not buying, click bait and  whoa is me

…….. I hadn’t seen it. Thank you for the submission! As op-ed pieces go, the writer has a specific interpretation of everything that’s going on, and has spun the “information” to fit that end. Some of this inforamtion will be new to those who haven’t been following this saga as closely as we have, but for me, the only new piece of info was that MM threw a “Sayonara Zara” party when she hit the big time, and at the party she gave away all her low-end clothes. (It’s funny how she said goodbye to Zara once she got a side part on a cable show, but Kate, who is going to be Queen Consort one day, still wears Zara. If this story is true, it’s very telling. And also unsurprising, given the kind of labels she started wearing the moment she got engaged.) The piece also confirms that Charles is taking MM’s side. Possibly the most irritating part of this article is that she reinforces the narrative that MM is “modernising the monarchy” in positive ways, by “crouching to greet children and the elderly” in an unprete pious manner that’s unseen within the monarchy. All the younger working royals have done this, and better, without MM. Harry, Kate, William have all done this. What the writer leaves out, is the reason people were screaming “breach of royal protocol” that particular day, was because she crouched to greet a kid, while wearing a dress slit almost to her ass, a measly button keeping the slit from reaching her derriere. This is why it’s dangerous to scream “beach of royal protocol” with every show of dark nail polish. The US media co-opts this to prove she is a “breath of fresh air”. But when they spin the narrative of her modernising the monarchy, they leave out the original pithy complaint (unless they are criticising the complainers) and instead cherry-pick arbitrary indicators of her “modernization” (with a z), preferably those with more gravitas than nail paint. The US “serious” journalists are as irresponsible as UK fleet street- they just do it with the garb of social consciousness and elitism. P.S. I see why the sugars are angry. Even though it is overwhelmingly positive about MM, it does mention that (a) She is ambitious (b) The decision to ignore Thomas Markle came from her. Every article that isn’t 100% positive about Saint Meghan deserves censure for sugars. 

The bottom line to me is that Meghan is getting married to a prince who will literally be a part of the future of the British Royal Family. They made a decision that they felt would make them happy. It does not matter how much “baggage” she has. She is a bride and deserved the right to make the decisions that would make her and her fiancé happy on their special day. One would assume that their families would support them and stand by them. Kensington Palace offered the Markles guidance and support as they don’t have a history in this situation the way the Windsors and others do. But at the end of the day Thomas, Thomas Jr., Samantha, and other members of the Markle family chose to turn their backs on their daughter, sister, family member, etc. and chose to use her to gain fame, attention, and money. They have sold her out and that is not something that is acceptable in my eyes. I had resigned myself to believing that it was everyone except her father, but he chose to make poor decisions as well. As someone who used to work in the entertainment industry, he should have known better.  Could KP have done a few things better? Probably. Hindsight is always 20/20. But at the end of the day, in my eyes, this is completely and whole heartedly on the Markles and on the decisions that they made.

Maybe Sammy and Thomas Jr. should take their own advice and apologize to their victims: their children, mother, and former partners.

Samantha, Carole, Pippa (although in recent years she's taken a step back) Thomas Jr/Sr, and Gary have all ridden the wave of Kate/Meghan's marriages to varying levels of success. The Middletons, however, at least support Kate and aren't total assholes toward their most successful member. Could you imagine Tom Sr writing about Meghan the same way Gary does about Kate?