Alias s02e05 âThe Indicatorâ
Does it pass the Bechdel Test?Â
Yes, four times. Â
How many female characters (with names and lines) are there?
Three (21.43%).
How many male characters (with names and lines) are there?
Eleven (78.57%).
Positive Content Rating:Â
Three
General Episode Quality:Â
Not bad, but needed to be much better. Â
MORE INFO (and potential spoilers) UNDER THE CUT:
Passing the Bechdel:
Sydney greets and congratulates Francie on her restaurant opening. Sydney talks about the training program for children with Dr. Kerr. Sydney meets with Dr. Kerr again. Â They proceed with regression therapy.
Female Characters:
Sydney Bristow
Francie Calfo
Virginia Kerr
Male Characters:
Senator Douglas
Jack Bristow
Arvin Sloane
Dixon
Michael Vaughn
Marshall
Will Tippin
Craig Blair
Manolo De Souza
Valery Kholokov
Agent Kelsey
Other Notes:
Francieâs restaurant has now opened and is apparently a hit, and this is still the least realistic story Alias has ever done. I do appreciate that she followed SpyDaddyâs advice about red walls.
Vaughn, when interviewing the person SpyDaddy hired to not blow up Sydney last episode, who is being kept prisoner by the C.I.A., actually says, casually and uncritically, that âA couple of years ago, and [he] would have had some civil rights. Now we just throw you in a cell, no attorney, no due process.â It is A LOT, and in stark contrast to the very sanitized version of the C.I.A. the show usually tries to present.Â
The guy from the Hungarian records office is probably my favorite minor extra from a Sydney SpyBarbie mission, in part because he and Sydney actually get to say lines that are not simply there to further the plot.
This episode deals with Project Christmas, a part of the Alias mythos that really should be far bigger that it ends up being. Unlike Rambaldi, itâs a story that is linked directly to the seriesâ themes of legacy, parenthood, and agency, and is much more immediate and personal than the ongoing treasure hunt. And yet, for some reason, the series never actually did much with it. This episode, which is the one that perhaps most focuses on it, folds the revelations surrounding it into the ongoing attempts by SpyDaddy to frame SpyMommy, in a way that frankly, doesnât make a whole lot of storytelling sense. Â
First of all, tying the two stories is unnecessary. Sydney doesnât really need an additional reason to be mad at Jack for manipulating her and placing her in danger. Â Just finding out that he did should be enough. Similarly, tying Project Christmas to SpyMommyâs fate minimizes Project Christmas; Sydneyâs anger and its immediacy prevents her or the series from thinking of the full implications of what she or the audience has learnedâand indeed, once Irina is saved, Sydneyâs emotional investment in Project Christmas quickly recedes. Â Plus, Sydneyâs conclusion at the end of this episodeâthat SpyDaddy framed Irina in order to prevent Sydney from knowing about Project Christmasâdoesnât really make any senseâhow would Irina know? Â
Of course, part of the problem is that in the end, the implications of Project Christmas are shockingly minor. The training regimen itself does not appear to be harmfulâthe most we see of it is puzzle-building and weapons maintenance, and none of the people familiar with the program ever suggest that its participants require urgent saving or intervention. Â Additionally, while Sydney may complain that Jack removed her agency by subjecting her to the regimen, that claim is at odds with the fact that Jack had absolutely no involvement in either her recruitment into SD-6 or her decision to join the C.I.A. While there is a lot of interesting ambiguity to the whole affairâthe fact that Sydneyâs memories of the regiment were erased without her consent, for one, is plainly immoralâSydney and the episode resist attempts to acknowledge that ambiguity. Â
In the end, what should have been a crucial episode instead feels disposable. Weâve seen Sydney jump to conclusions and turn on Jack before, but even with the new wrinkles, the series has at this point demonstrated that it isnât interested in using that conflict to actually say anything or take either character in any interesting directions. Â











