Jun 22
Loading...
seen from China
seen from India
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Kosovo
seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from France
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Malaysia
seen from France
seen from India
seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia
seen from China
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
AI backlash isn't like any other tech backlash
I keep getting comments from people who say: "People opposed computers in the 90s. Opposition to AI is just the same. These people are opposed to technology." I find this horrendously clueless because it has no sense of proportion attached to it. Since I am from the 90s myself, I wrote a comment to explain the differences today. Sharing it below.
The question I am answering is: Vimoh, why your concern about AI is not same as 90s people used to think about computers?
Computers are reliable. AI is not. Computers give you consistent and reliable results. AI is fundamentally unreliable and this has been shown to be true in multiple major and minor institutions and companies by now.
Computers were not replacing human beings, simply moving them from one kind of job to another. AI is ending human employment as a concept. AI company CEOs are OPENLY saying they want all human jobs to go away.
Computers created a lot of jobs. Most of us today are working because of computers. AI is creating no jobs. Even AI data centers don't employ more than a few hundred people.
Computers didn't destroy the environment the way AI does. AI data centers are leeching off huge amounts of electricity and water supplies that humans need, especially in these times of great climate change. Computers plugged into existing power systems and worked just fine.
Computers were adopted by people because they were genuinely useful. AI is being forced on people in offices. If it was actually useful, people would happily use it. People using AI frequently produce bad or substandard work and that low quality output is becomign a new standard. It's a collective lowering of value.
Computers enhanced creativity and enabled humans to create tons of culture. AI is reducing the value of human culture by turning the entire internet into slop.
Computers were not part of a massive financial bubble. AI is. This has been reported on a lot by now. You can read about it.
Lastly, I am 90s people. I love computers. I remember the issues people had with computers then. It wasn't even remotely anything like what AI backlash today looks like. Anyone telling you it is, don't know what they are talking about.
Question: How would you fork Android for Smartphones today, so that such a forked Android phone:
1) could be as far as possible be not dependent on either AOSP or Google/Alphabet owned products and services,
2) could essentially use app binaries/packages designed and/or coded for "mainline/official" Google-approved Android, and
3) more or less participate adequately (or even participate "fully") in the global mobile Inter-networked Internet and the Internet market-economy?
With advanced in open standards and EU-lead tech delegation, it should be possible now, right..?
The hard truth is that you have no hope of managing your children’s relationship with technology unless you can manage your own.
It’s never to late...
How evil is tech?
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
6/27/17. When will the tech backlash begin? It’s very rare that I have a five minute conversation with someone where the other person is not looking at or tapping on their smartphone for a majority of the time. At work, a majority of my co-workers spend 65% (sometimes a lot more) of their time at work tapping on their devices. www.chrisfrancz.com
It was an unseasonably warm December, and somewhere nearby a rising tide in the San Francisco Bay was lifting all kite-surfers, but Nick Edwards and Chris Monberg were crouched at opposite rented desks in a shared coworking space near the Caltrain station in SoMa wondering if, by the via Pocket
The house belonged to Anthony Levandowski, a Google engineer best known for leading the self-driving car project. The protesters claim Levandowski left his house on a previous day wearing Google Glass, carrying a baby and a tablet, but only paying attention to the tablet. via Pocket