Hi! Where is the original source from the archewell statement? Like which publication released archwells statement re Harry and the British public?
Spokesperson spoke to HuffPost here.
seen from China
seen from Germany

seen from Indonesia
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Czechia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from Greece
seen from Ireland

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
Hi! Where is the original source from the archewell statement? Like which publication released archwells statement re Harry and the British public?
Spokesperson spoke to HuffPost here.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
In response to the articles claiming Harry said "these Brits need to learn a lesson" - Archewell:
"This is a baseless hit piece masquerading as journalism. This story is riddled with inaccuracies, not least of which is a quote erroneously attributed to Prince Harry," the spox adds. "To accuse a man who spent 10 years serving his country of wanting to teach that same country a lesson is not only an attempted distraction but an unfortunate and predictable tabloid strategy. To pit him against his country is shameful and manipulative, especially when Prince Harry has never spoken ill of the British public."
Little sissy man going hard
There's a petition to make Major Johnny Thompson Duke of Sussex instead of Harry
I don't quite understand all the fuss about the man, but if you're British, sign that petition!
No llegara a ningun Paris but it would be fun.
On Friday, March 5, 2021, after 24 years in prison, the Hon. Judge Joseph A. Zayas of the Queens County Supreme Court overturned the 1996 co
"On Friday, March 5, 2021, after 24 years in prison, the Hon. Judge Joseph A. Zayas of the Queens County Supreme Court overturned the 1996 convictions of Gary Johnson, 46; George Bell, 44; and Rohan Bolt, 59. The three men were finally released from Green Haven Correctional Facility in upstate New York to waiting family, friends, and media coverage. Zayas found that the three menâs convictions were based off of coercive interrogations, shoddy police work, racism, and pressure from then-Mayor Rudy Giuliani to arrest and convict them rather than based on justice. Upon his release, The New York Times reports that Bolt held two of his grandchildrenâs hands for the first time and said, âWe finally made it.â
The three men were serving sentences of 50 years to life for the shooting deaths of off-duty police officer Charles Davis and shop owner Ira Epstein at a check-cashing store in East Elmhurst, Queens, on Dec. 21, 1996. As the Times explains, Johnson, Bell, and Boltâs convictions were thrown out in no small part due to how corrupt and clearly morally bankrupt the process had been from top to bottom. âProsecutors never turned over police reports showing that investigators had linked the killings to other men, the members of a local robbery ring. And five witness accounts â never seen by defense lawyers â contradicted the menâs confessions, which were wrong on key details of the crime, and which lawyers say were coerced.â This means not only was the entire process of investigating and getting confessions out of the men flawed, but that both law enforcement and prosecutors knew full well there was ample evidence other people had committed this crime, and they allowed those people to go free in order to put three innocent men away for life.
During his ruling, Zayas said: "It astounds me and shocks my conscience that even in 1997, that constitutional violations of this magnitude can happen in any prosecution much less the prosecution in a capital case in which the former district attorney was seeking the death penalty of a 19-year-old man.â
Speaking via video conference, Zayas told the three men that he was âvacating your convictions. Iâm releasing you.â Zayas went on to say that âthe miscarriage of justice in your cases was egregious and it took way too long to discover the truth.â Defense attorney Mitchell Dinnerstein told reporters the pressure to have resultsâa pressure that was politically motivatedâled to this railroading of injustice. âThe crime occurred a few days before Christmas, and Giuliani said âWeâre going to solve this case by Christmas.ââ After decades of work done by the families of the innocent men and their attorneys, the Queens district attorneyâs office finally looked into the case and discovered how much evidence had been purposefully withheld from the defense lawyers in the 1996 case. Everything from the fact that the single eyewitness who placed the three men at the crime being someone who âsuffered from hallucinationsâ to the numerous witnesses who told the police another group of men, referred to as a crew of robbers known as âSpeedstick,â were responsible for the murders.
George Bell read a statement from prison via video before his release, saying: âAfter I was convicted for capital murder, I couldnât fathom or wrap my mind around how God would allow the justice system I believed in to fail me in such a tragic fashion.â Bell was 19 years old and Johnson was 22 at the time of their arrest. After being âsubject to coercive interrogations,â both men confessed. But these confessions âbear all the hallmarks of the false confessions that resulted in wrongful convictions in the past.â This includes important incongruities in their statements and key facts that they recall incorrectly. This happens during false confessions because the law enforcement officers who are interrogating the suspects donât have all of the facts finalized. As on-the-scene investigations are underway, autopsies are being conducted, and ballistics are being done while they are interrogating, the officers will feed the victims of these false confessions with false facts. Bolt, who was older with two young children, always maintained his innocence, even addressing the widows of the men during his sentencing in the courtroom to tell them: âI know one day God will show them the truth, that Rohan Bolt did not have nothing to do with it.âÂ
Queens District Attorney Melinda Katz is currently the lead prosecutor at the Queens' Conviction Integrity Unit (CIU). According to the Queens Eagle, Katzâs CIU has recently helped overturn seven cases, including those of Bell, Johnson, and Bolt. Katz says her office will continue to review the case as she attempts to play both sides of the political story here.
âI cannot stand behind these convictions,â Ms. Katz said in a statement on Friday. âHowever, there is at this time insufficient evidence of actual innocence and therefore we are taking this opportunity to re-evaluate and examine the evidence.â
On the one hand, itâs clear that a tragedy of justice took place here and there are ramifications for that. There are people like Brad Leventhal, one of the prosecutors on the original case who is now the head of the Homicide Trial Bureau in Queens County; and Charles Testagrossa, former prosecutor in the Queens district attorneyâs office who Katz says did not act maliciously in this caseâthough the vacating of the charges says otherwise. As if on cue (and missing the point entirely), president of the New York City Police Benevolent Association Patrick Lynch released an angry statement saying: âThere is absolutely no reason that these convicted cop-killers should be put back on the street,â and that the family of the late Charles Davis is âdevastated by the possibility that nobody will be held accountable for his murder.â
But what is lost here is that it is our justice system that should be yelled at, not the three men who were wrongfully convicted of a murder and who have lost decades of their lives to racism, political pressure, and opportunism. While Rudy Giuliani was holding Christmas Day press conferences to promote the police departmentâs arrest of the killers of Davis and Epstein, it seems very likely that this pressure to score political pointsâmixed with the general white supremacist system, corruption, and racism as usualâwas allowing real murderers to go free.
One of several prosecutors in all three cases, Brad A. Leventhal, was among them. Court records show a three-judge appeals panel overturned a conviction in one of Mr. Leventhalâs attempted murder cases, ordering a new trial in 2006 based on ârepeated instances of prosecutorial misconductâ during the cross-examination of a witness and closing arguments.
Katzâs attempts at rectifying the situation has been political and lacking. According to the the three menâs lawyers, after reviewing the evidence Katzâs office and the CIU took almost a year to finally get around to letting these men out of prison.
âThis should have been done a year ago. What were they doing that caused them to drag their feet?â said Mitchell Dinnerstein, one of Mr. Bellâs trial lawyers. He added that he believed the office had taken its position because it was âtrying to protectâ the prosecutors involved, one of whom still works there.
The math being done by Katzâs office will not stop subsequent civil lawsuits against the state of New York. There will be maneuvers behind the scenes to cut plea deals and promises of no further attempts to try the men, and maybe that will be enough for men who have missed their childrenâs childhoods and just want to begin their lives again. The system is broken and while people fret about âcancel cultureâ and people revisiting authors like Dr. Seuss and looking at them in a new light, there are very real people in very real positions of power who should have been canceled a long time ago, if not imprisoned for their repeated violations of American citizenâs rights and liberties."

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
As fans you can have different opinions, feel that your favourites were treated badly or unfairly, since 2018 that has been the narrative with the Dumbartons and their fans but I feel there is a limit, there are comparisons that should not be made because they are pointless and extremely disrespectful, this is a clear example of that. No matter what you believe happened to the Sussexes, their experience will NEVER be comparable to those of the Holocaust survivors. There are lines that should never be crossed, it's unbelievable that this fandom crosses them over and over again without a care in the world. The narrative that the BRF or the Cambridges really participated in the âabusedâ itâs honestly stupid. This people said they would leave when the Sussexes did, the Sussexes did and they are still here. They hate the BRF and the Cambridges but if you check their accounts they only talk about them NOT their favs. I want to believe this is pure ignorance because the other option is honestly sad.
Didn't they say that they were going to be committed to their causes despite leaving? Or did I dream that? H should take a long hard look of himself in the mirror and start making amends.
They did. Covid made it difficult but they havenât done much with their patronages, Charlesâ second daughter-in-law doesnât have many patronages so it shouldnât be difficult and Charlesâ second son doesnât have many patronages either but đ¤ˇââď¸
I read that the national theatre was having problems since the beginning of the pandemic or the lockdown, during that time they have done several things that William's second sister-in-law could have helped but nothing. I think some of them keep saying that they are committed to helping them, etc., but if no one knows, how are they helping them? One of the most important things a royal can offer their patronages is exposure. And they haven't done that this year. I remember that in March Charles' second daughter-in-law made a visit to the national theatre. It was private. She only posted photos with a 4 paragraph caption in their Instagram account, only one of which was about the visit, the press wasnât invited so people only saw the photos they provided with the info they wanted to give, she was there to promote an exhibition that ended 2 days later and apparently the theatre was not happy. Again, it was about the exposure. And she didnât give them that.
About the last part of your message, I hope you are comfortable because I doubt that will happen soon.